|
Slipknot Hoagie posted:If the slate article I read is to be believed, 10% of it went to growing almonds in the desert. 80% turns into the food our great nation consumes. And when it's all gone, let the bodies hit the floor.
|
# ¿ May 16, 2014 02:26 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 20:48 |
|
I think we can all agree on two things: 1) Making sweeping generalizations about million+ person metropolitan regions is silly. SF, East/South Bay, LA, Austin, etc all have cool people and places, and awful people and places. 2) Watching tourists in July at the Embarcadero wearing short sleeves and shorts is the gift that keeps on giving.
|
# ¿ May 17, 2014 03:22 |
|
California's property situation is hosed, and there is no easy solution to making it better in the the bay area. I make low 50's as a newish teacher and my gf makes low 60's working as one of the barely valued non-engineers for a peninsula tech company. We have come to the conclusion that one (or both) of us is going to have to change careers if we ever want to own a home that isn't in the little Mexico area of San Jose. The insult to injury is that all of the attractive new 3-4 story apartment units being built start at 2500 a month for a fairly modest 2 bedroom...
|
# ¿ May 28, 2014 23:09 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Obviously just live in
|
# ¿ May 28, 2014 23:21 |
|
Leperflesh posted:Not as far as Tracy, but a long commute is in your future if you want to own a home. With an income of 110k gross, you can probably afford a house in various parts of the East Bay. There are still modest homes at around $300k in my neck of the woods, for example (Concord).
|
# ¿ May 28, 2014 23:31 |
|
Capitalism gives no fucks about anything other than profit, until those things threaten profit enough to make interest in them profitable. If anyone tells you contrary to this, they are relying on anecdote and should be ignored. No one will fix bay area traffic until it is profitable to do so. Given that it will almost certainly never be profitable, it will never be fixed.
|
# ¿ Jun 21, 2014 03:15 |
|
Shbobdb posted:Given broad strokes, I don't think anyone is disagreeing with this. Shbobdb posted:I mean, if we are gonna blame capitalism, let's just go for the commute itself. Things like concentration of wealth, white flight (and its close sibling gentrification) and all that poo poo is a function of capitalism. Space-Bird posted:It's weird. I don't know a single person who doesn't want better public transport in the Bay Area. Most people want to pay for it too, but local politics seem to prevent anything productive from happening. What's the "real story" behind it? cheese fucked around with this message at 08:11 on Jun 21, 2014 |
# ¿ Jun 21, 2014 08:02 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Uh, I mean that commute would still be 2.5+ on public transit, but not for the reasons you suggest. It's a 30 minute bus ride to the Fremont BART station from downtown San Jose. Plus the Caltrain would be way more expensive than taking a bus from San Jose to Fremont.
|
# ¿ Jun 21, 2014 17:36 |
|
It really is so god drat beautiful.
|
# ¿ Jun 21, 2014 20:54 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Glad to see our corporate warriors are fighting against tyranny for us: http://blog.sfgate.com/cityinsider/2014/06/26/monkeyparking-tells-sf-its-not-going-to-kill-its-parking-app/
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 02:08 |
|
mA posted:If you're attempting to justify Google's hilariously pathetic hiring track record by appealing to UC admissions you should probably look elsewhere (nice try, though!). The UC system's newly admitted class is over 28.8% Chicano/Latino, which is a tad higher than a "tiny portion".
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 19:49 |
|
on the left posted:I am sure this is true for Africa as well, but there are plenty of well-qualified Hispanics in central and south America who can't get visas to come work for Google in the USA. If congress would fix the visa situation, a lot more diversity would take place. Hispanics are definitely hurt by the fact that immigration has been dominated by the uneducated/unskilled, who will then have children who are behind their peers, and so on and so forth.
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2014 01:33 |
|
on the left posted:Yes, and for those jobs they hire the top part of the class at selective universities.
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2014 02:47 |
|
on the left posted:Not Stanford only, but I did find this graphic: on the left posted:Why on Earth should Google adopt those kind of hiring practices?
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2014 03:25 |
|
Rah! posted:I just saw news footage of a community meeting type thing they had, where the people were voicing their concerns. One old woman (white, of course) was literally crying as she spoke into the mic, and said: "I feel we're being destroyed"
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2014 02:15 |
|
The Insect Court posted:It's not that they're delusional, it's that to the Americanness = Whiteness. An America where a black guy is President and a female guy will probably be the next one and where you occasional see billboards and signs in shop windows written in Spanish and have to press 1 for English is to them not America. Not "it's a possible future for America we really wouldn't like" but it's not America. Not in a hyperbolic or metaphorical sense, but literally not America. Leperflesh posted:They've been lied to, as well. They don't have an accurate perception of the country's economic prosperity, or of the proportion of the population made up of recent immigrants (illegal or not). They have been told that Mexicans are literally stealing and destroying everything that they and their forefathers made, that the country's wealth and prosperity is bleeding out from all those greedy immigrants welching off of the system.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2014 18:13 |
|
bango skank posted:That seems a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face though. When people show up with the scalped reservation you can refuse them service on principle but then you're still screwed as far as filling your tables goes.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2014 03:15 |
|
Forceholy posted:Honestly, everything east of Ontario is pretty much Arizona at that point. An Awful Bill posted:Silence or lack of resistance does not constitute consent. The legislation says it's also not consent if the person is drunk, drugged, unconscious or asleep.
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2014 17:12 |
|
Pohl posted:You failed to mention that budget was for firefighting.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 04:18 |
|
This is true of literally every state. Not to defend central valley conservatives, but "rich areas with high cost of living paying more in per capita taxes than poor areas with cheap cost of living" is pretty much the norm and almost inevitable math wise. That map could also read "the people with the most money own homes in these yellow areas" and it would be true.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 07:03 |
|
Bip Roberts posted:Nothing in the world is more funny than Northern Californians acting like they don't ship in water from across the state. Trabisnikof posted:And I'm asking if you believe a less distorted and "suitable for the state's needs" water market would impact either the total actual consumption of water for Ag or local food availability or prices?
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2015 04:06 |
|
Sounds like the free market hard at work here folks. Sorry you guys arnt down with the creative disruption of an archaic old economy
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2015 06:34 |
|
Kenning posted:So when do we start burning down almond orchards? This isn't apropos the AZ troll guy, just something I've been thinking about. A good start would be to force farmers to use efficient technologies to reduce water usage. A shocking number of almond farmers pay little to no attention to when they water and how they water, resulting in significant over use of water and under production of crops. Using electronic measuring of water flow rates through the soil, computer weather modeling and other tools, we can greatly increase our water usage efficiency - but with grandfathered water rights and artificially cheap water, why bother with more expensive systems?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 00:40 |
|
gonger posted:A targeted anti-tech protest action (https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2015/04/14/18771083.php) flopped pretty hard today:
|
# ¿ May 7, 2015 00:31 |
|
SirPablo posted:I'm late on this, but here is an article about food deserts right in the goddamn San Joaquin Valley.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2015 00:11 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Oh sounds like this thread could use a map! Baby Babbeh posted:People from other states are really ignorant of California's ecology in general. It's a dry state, but only the far southeastern part of it is actually a desert. The rest of it basically has a Mediterranean climate. Bip Roberts posted:Even places where it is a genuine desert, irrigating in places like the Coachella valley creates by far the most productive ($/acre) farmland in the US. It's not sustainable for a number of reasons but no the productivity is absolutely unmatched. cheese fucked around with this message at 00:58 on Jul 22, 2015 |
# ¿ Jul 22, 2015 00:53 |
|
Leperflesh posted:Without going into details, I have personal contacts who are close to Newsom's family (mostly his father, a retired judge). He's well-connected to extreme wealth, he's incredibly carefully groomed, he's carefully Democratic, and he has taken some very, very calculated risks that have paid off very well. I don't think he's a replicant. I think he's a archetypical politician. He's very effective as an executive. All of his opinions and positions and speeches are meticulously vetted and calculated. He is especially good at schmoozing with the deep-pocketed donor class that drive all effective political campaigns.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2015 17:59 |
|
Spite posted:Repealing it would completely gently caress over the Bay Area. Currently the only way to afford a home in the Bay Area is to 1a) be rich 1b) make a bunch of money in tech or 2) have bought it 30 years ago. Suddenly making property taxes adjust would kick a huge portion of the populace out of their homes. And rent is already sky high.
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2015 04:26 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Large corporate farms waste less water and pollute less per unit of food produced than smaller farms or growing food at home. Leperflesh posted:It's about a handful of wealthy families and profitable corporations exporting California's limited water to Texas and China in the form of an unnecessary alfalfa crop, depleting its millenia-old aquifer permanently, and a state goverment so far largely unwilling to give up the lucrative lobbying dollars those families shovel into their pockets.
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2015 04:10 |
|
HelloSailorSign posted:What then should be California's long term water solution(s)? cheese fucked around with this message at 05:32 on Aug 31, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 31, 2015 05:27 |
|
ProperGanderPusher posted:You'd be surprised how much I hear the sentiment, "Trains are for Europeans. This is America. We drive cars here. The solution is always more roads." Typically from people over 60, of course, but they vote faithfully.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2015 18:06 |
|
FRINGE posted:Youre trying too hard.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2015 22:13 |
|
Ron Jeremy posted:Some people are pissed Junipero Serra is going to be a Saint.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2015 01:13 |
|
Leperflesh posted:And, seriously, it doesn't loving matter. We can't afford to keep watering lawns, so we need to change perceptions, which we know for a fact can be done because many cultures worldwide have favored gardens that aren't lawns at various times for centuries.
|
# ¿ Oct 24, 2015 00:23 |
|
Leperflesh posted:Oh I completely agree. Watering lawns is a drop in the bucket in terms of overall consumption of water in the state. But I believe we got started on this topic by discussing the very wealthy individuals spending many thousands of dollars a month to water their palatial estates? And I also think there's something to be said for reversing or fighting the acculturation that makes people prefer (totally unnatural) trimmed green patches of lawn, to (much more natural) varied gardens of native plants. Because if we as Californians can take personal responsibility for making good decisions about water use, we're more likely to insist on the government and private industry reforms necessary to make large-scale water conservation and sustainability possible.
|
# ¿ Oct 24, 2015 01:03 |
|
That "average effective apartment rate in San Jose" number is pretty crazily influenced the by flood of high end luxury apartments. poo poo, the triangle formed by the 237, 880 and 101 must have added 2k new units just in the last few years (they just finished a ~450 unit 4 story complex across from the Chik-fil-A on north 1st street and the cheapest unit in that thing is a 2600 dollar one bedroom).
|
# ¿ Nov 24, 2015 07:55 |
|
Spazzle posted:How is SJ more expensive than SF? Bast Relief posted:I find the biking, but only in midtown, in Sac is really easy too. I rarely drove my car. I found it really difficult to leave, but hey, love. I just really miss the coveneince and the tree-lined streets.
|
# ¿ Nov 24, 2015 19:22 |
|
Litany Unheard posted:That said the dating scene here is poo poo compared to SF/the Bay.
|
# ¿ Nov 24, 2015 19:32 |
|
Keyser S0ze posted:Yeah all that poo poo is awful and horrifying and more fun down in old Roseville dive bars and away from all the megamegachain poo poo.
|
# ¿ Nov 25, 2015 01:36 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 20:48 |
|
Runaktla posted:Guy gets shot by bean bag gun and doesn't drop knife, I hate to say it but he deserves to be shot. Knives can kill/maim as well, and sometimes better than guns (though not 20 of them lol). He was walking away and could harm somebody.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 20:57 |