|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdsMBMwlffY Suits, one of USA's highest rated shows and one of the highest pirated shows last year returns tonight for its fourth season. It hasn't been that long since the previous season finale that saw Mike (Patrick J Adams) quitting Pearson Specter to work as an investment banker. He's still going to interact with the rest of the cast as his new company has Pearson Specter on retainer. Its not all roses as they quickly find themselves on opposite sides. Joining the cast as recurring characters this season are Michael Gross and Brendan Hines as clients. Tonight's episode: "One-Two-Three Go..." Mike and Harvey clash over investment banking strategies in the Season 4 opener. Meanwhile, Jessica realizes a former district attorney may be pursuing revenge against Harvey and the firm. In conclusion: 
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 20:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 12:07 |
|
|
drat, back so soon, I can get used to this split season format.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 20:15
|
|
|
Suits Season 4: The Student Becomes the Master? I hope so.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 20:18
|
|
|
Something I forgot to mention, the show's EP promised that Mike quitting isn't going to be resolved in one/a couple of episodes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 21:02
|
|
|
I thought Suits aired on Thursdays?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 21:32
|
|
|
HonorableTB posted:I thought Suits aired on Thursdays? Nope, Wednesdays for now!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 21:33
|
|
|
So pumped to have this back! Looking forward to having some tea while watching in my Litt Up mug!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 22:38
|
|
|
I broke down and watched a preview for this season, and it's confusing the hell out of me. Why does the show seem to suggest that Mike is going to be the lead attorney on a lawsuit against Harvey and/or Pearson Spector? I thought the whole point of taking the new job was so that he wouldn't be perpetrating a fraud every day for the rest of his life?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2014 23:05
|
|
|
Can we get a pin for the new season?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 01:51
|
|
|
WOOP WOOP
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:00
|
|
|
That was a crazy fake out there.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:02
|
|
|
Catty! Also, not sure about Rachel's new hairdo.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:06
|
|
|
Please tell me this B plot of this season isn't Mike learning that investment bankers are sharks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
Its been a couple of seasons so of course Patrick J Adams and Gabriel Macht are producers. Edit: Hey, Katrina is still around!
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
Oh man I love the revitalization of grade A Harvey/Mike/Donna banter.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:15
|
|
|
This episode is getting angry. Edit: Schmuck Me muscles like this! fucked around with this message at 02:37 on Jun 12, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:29
|
|
|
This is pretty intense
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
The funny thing about that Harvey/Mike meeting was the Princess Bride sparring.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 03:28
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:The funny thing about that Harvey/Mike meeting was the Princess Bride sparring. I'm impressed they kept it so subtle.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 05:06
|
|
|
Donna and Donna 2.0 
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 15:05
|
|
|
It might be just me but I'm glad they are turning Mike into less of a boring pussy now. However something that irked me was they sort of shoehorned a "Rachel/Mike" rift because of their employment situation in the dialog. OH I DONT CARE IF YOU NEED ME TO HELP YOU ILL DO WHAT I GOTTA DO I FOUGHT MY FATHER. It felt really forced.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
vyst posted:It might be just me but I'm glad they are turning Mike into less of a boring pussy now. I also didn't understand why she told him who she had an affair with or why it mattered at that exact moment? I think I missed something. Is it just +1 incentive for Mike to win?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 20:07
|
|
|
PaganGoatPants posted:I also didn't understand why she told him who she had an affair with or why it mattered at that exact moment? I think I missed something. Is it just +1 incentive for Mike to win? That annoyed me too. Why does that matter? It was before they were dating. Is she going to sleep with him again?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 20:16
|
|
|
Well she does know that Mike and that guy are going to be butting heads, and that guy might bring it up. So maybe she thought best to get out in front of it?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 20:18
|
|
|
Zythrst posted:Well she does know that Mike and that guy are going to be butting heads, and that guy might bring it up. So maybe she thought best to get out in front of it? Why would he know who Mike is dating? Oh yeah I slept with your GF, and cheated on my wife  Also would they even need to meet face to face? DRAMA!
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 22:13
|
|
|
Mike is going to lose on the legal side and will threaten to reveal the infidelty which makes Rachel really angry. It's soapy tv 101 to slow the relationship between Rachel and Mike down.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 22:47
|
|
|
GaussianCopula posted:Mike is going to lose on the legal side and will threaten to reveal the infidelty which makes Rachel really angry. It's soapy tv 101 to slow the relationship between Rachel and Mike down. That is what I was thinking, I feel like it's going to come up when Mike is losing and is forced to decide if he wants to use the infidelity to beat Harvey. Good episode but needs more Litt time; going to have to wait until next episode for a possible confrontation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2014 23:04
|
|
|
GaussianCopula posted:Mike is going to lose on the legal side and will threaten to reveal the infidelty which makes Rachel really angry. It's soapy tv 101 to slow the relationship between Rachel and Mike down. This is really on point and I think it's exactly how it goes down.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 02:40
|
|
|
vyst posted:This is really on point and I think it's exactly how it goes down. Probably. Seems like the weakest way out though. I assume a break-up would follow.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 02:50
|
|
|
PaganGoatPants posted:Probably. Seems like the weakest way out though. I assume a break-up would follow. Nah, they've played around too much with all that stuff before. They can't break Mike and Rachel up AGAIN.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 02:58
|
|
|
Good episode. Poor Lit, I love the guy, though. I also want to add to the opinions of the dumbness about Rachel telling Mike about a guy she hosed a long time ago. Was there DRAMA the first time she told Mike she had an affair? Did that add to the story at the time? Either way, Who the gently caress cares? If I were Mike I'd just ask "I appreciate the honesty; why did you feel the need to tell me this?" because who the gently caress caaaaaaaaaaares?
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 19:22
|
|
|
Have Harvey and Rachel had any scenes before that episode? I can't think of any.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 19:25
|
|
|
Colonial Air Force posted:That annoyed me too. Why does that matter? It was before they were dating. Is she going to sleep with him again?
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 21:20
|
|
|
ufarn posted:Rachel is never going to pass the Bechdel test. The writers don't seem to know what they want to do with the character aside from the gratuitous shots that bunch of other female actresses get as well. As a human being she's fine, but as another character in that show she comes off as incredibly bland and servile. At least Donna is sassy and independent or whatever. Although Rachel's response to Donna's "Just like me in high school in the 90's" was pretty hilarious in its delivery. "Is it?" with a you know you're not that young, bitch quit lying playful undertone.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 22:51
|
|
|
ufarn posted:Rachel is never going to pass the Bechdel test. The writers don't seem to know what they want to do with the character aside from the gratuitous shots that bunch of other female actresses get as well. Katrina's character has done a 180 and it's weird.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 22:54
|
|
|
PaganGoatPants posted:Katrina's character has done a 180 and it's weird. At least let Rachel and Donna do something that doesn't have to do with Harvey and Mike with their own drama and whatnot. Mike's new secretary is already more interesting than Rachel.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 23:35
|
|
|
ufarn posted:Yeah, that was a bit of a rushed development. Which is why Mike will probably end up loving her.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 23:45
|
|
|
vyst posted:Which is why Mike will probably end up loving her.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2014 23:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 12:07 |
|
|
ufarn posted:Which kind of goes to show how women automatically become Chekhovian plot elements on Suits. Suits: I didn't want mushrooms in my lo mein
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2014 01:04
|
|