|
http://techreport.com/news/26911/errata-prompts-intel-to-disable-tsx-in-haswell-early-broadwell-cpusquote:The TSX instructions built into Intel's Haswell CPU cores haven't become widely used by everyday software just yet, but they promise to make certain types of multithreaded applications run much faster than they can today. Some of the savviest software developers are likely building TSX-enabled software right about now. INTELLLLLL 
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2014 21:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
intel can disable parts of their chips and still be faster than amd
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2014 21:39
|
|
|
in before someone posts "granny clockin'"
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2014 21:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2014 22:05
|
|
|
haswell? more like has been am i rite?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2014 23:08
|
|
|
Mr. Apollo posted:haswell? more like has been am i rite? broadwell more like broadsick
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2014 23:15
|
|
|
lol at the "hacker" "news" comments:quote:I've been tempted recently by the Devil's Canyon repackaging of Haswell that for the first time has some of the workstation/server features (VT-d, TSX, but no ECC) enabled on an overclockable model. Losing TSX definitely cuts down on that temptation a bit, but they've still got the combination of full virtualization capabilities and much higher single-threaded performance than anything else out there. yeah the first thing i do with my expensive server chip is to overclock the poo poo out of it!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:12
|
|
|
has, well, sucked tbh
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:28
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:
lorf
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
guys everything is fine at Intel, nothing to worry about, pay no attention to the blood running down my face
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
itanium is the future
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
pram posted:itanium is the future 
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:lol at the "hacker" "news" comments: devil's canyon is aimed at overclockers, hth
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:36
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:devil's canyon is aimed at overclockers, hth yes which is why i need ECC and TSX because those will help me play skyrim faster
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:36
|
|
|
we estimate a 1 trillion dollar profit by 2008
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 00:37
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:intel can disable parts of their chips and still be faster than amd
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 01:30
|
|
|
EU fines intel for being too successful
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 01:30
|
|
|
basically we all make little mistakes here and there but the reality is how can you be judged at bad if nobody else is better?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 01:31
|
|
|
oh good pagancows here to make 15 posts in a row about poo poo nobody cares about
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 02:05
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:devil's canyon satan's rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 02:07
|
|
|
just like devil's canyon back home
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:oh good pagancows here to make 15 posts in a row about poo poo nobody cares about
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 02:10
|
|
|
devil's crayon
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:just like devil's canyon back home v rude thing to call to ur mam
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:v rude thing to call to ur mam she's certainly bigger than two meters!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 02:31
|
|
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:oh good pagancows here to make 15 posts in a row about poo poo nobody cares about dont sign
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 03:12
|
|
|
what's the deal with intel loving up a bunch lately like are they just too optimistic or is it quantum physics or do they really just not give a poo poo because they have no desktop competition
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 04:38
|
|
|
Blackula69 posted:what's the deal with intel loving up a bunch lately they're loving up because they've eliminated all the competition so now they have to compete against their toughest competitor ever: intel
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 04:43
|
|
|
like i said intel = too successful
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 04:48
|
|
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:oh good pagancows here to make 15 posts in a row about poo poo nobody cares about
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:10
|
|
|
my new intel processor is OK I guess. I'm tryin to tell it to upgrade to i7. I don't know if there is much point? i am now a game developer you see
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
sell it I mean
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:34
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:my new intel processor is OK I guess. lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:41
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:42
|
|
|
so why is this tsx thing good?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:47
|
|
|
Transactional Synchronization Extensions (TSX) is an extension to the x86 instruction set architecture that adds hardware transactional memory support, speeding up execution of multi-threaded software through lock elision.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:49
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:I'm tryin to tell it to upgrade to is this still in??
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:50
|
|
|
i have no idea
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
what is lock elision?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2014 05:56
|
|