Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:
The budding American fascist movement almost had it's first casualty in the fight for liberty.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

My Imaginary GF posted:

Gentlemen, surely we need to form a union to set a price-floor on minimum vote prices. Now, what you'll get is anything above a minimum amount that campaigns agree to pay, along with an annual dividend payment in proportion to the total members of your family who vote the way we want. As a guarantee for payments, we'll need you to snapchat a picture of your ballot to a verification algorithm's address.

Campaigns: $200 per vote or $100,000 for our block of votes.

Collectivism is anti-american.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

SavageBastard posted:

It might have I don't know. I do know that he provides some of the only real "debate & discussion" in these threads and why people get so mad about him is beyond me. A true troll does it just to get people worked up. Amergin does a pretty decent job at presenting an opposing view and I actually enjoy thinking about and reading how people respond. Without hat this just becomes another echo chamber steamrolling towards liberal fantasyland. Heaven forbid someone present some lovely viewpoints and people have to make a post that isn't pure reaction.

People keep throwing around echo chamber but it's really not most of the threads on SA have trended towards being more specialized,these threads used to be 100s of pages. It's really not an opposing view though very rarely did he post his actual positions and when he did it wasn't anything more than standard SA liberal so I'm not seeing how a liberal pretending to be conservative is stopping an echo chamber. If you wanted to do that you'd merge Gip and D&D. :getin:

My Imaginary GF posted:

Look at this scab, living at 123 North Fake Street. Sure would be bad if anything happened to this scab. Now, I'm not saying scabs deserve violence, that'd ve illegal, one shouldn't scab in a house with glass windows.

Good thing unions are on life support in this country or I'd actually be worried.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

It's satire and all but Ferguson was not a race riot,there was no riot ugh.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Petr posted:

Oh thank God for the name change. Now I can read this thread at work again.

Fried Chicken encouraging goons not to work. Anyways when is congress back in session officially?

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:

September 8. Yes, they get another goddamn week off after Labor Day :argh:

It's good no one lost their vacation time, but this friend was scared at the time she was going to have no money left before they called off the shutdown.

This makes me irrationally angry. I mean Americans can't even get a week of guaranteed time off,meanwhile these fucks get whole months. I know it's so they can do other jobs or whatever excuse they came up with but the Senate has how many millionaires?

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Nonsense posted:

97% of the members of the House make more than 2 million dollars a year.

Source? I knew the Senate was like 2/3s millionaires but I thought the house was a little more equal.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

They already have one and you know it.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

radical meme posted:

I'm sure it is. Does that make it any less of a play on a stereotype?


Texas.

He's in a suit though? Is this what Republicans mean when they say liberals are the real racists?

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

ReindeerF posted:

Yes, it's not lying or twisting anything, it's just being disingenuous. There's a problem, it shouldn't be there, but it's not our job to fix it! Being a Republican in government must be a killer gig. You spend all your time taking payoffs from lobbyists and anytime someone tells you to eat your carrots you scribble out a 500 word internally consistent, but completely irrelevant excuse for why you're not going to eat your carrots and then smirk.

Ainsley Hayes quickly sums up the traditional Republican position on various equal rights for women issues:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXPLirJRGDQ

I don't understand how people who actively want government to be reduced just military and the judiciary and everything else being left up to private industry are not considered totally bonkers in the 21st century.

edit: Forgot to mention they don't like the federal government and want politics to basically be on the state level it's like how do you plan on getting anything done. Honestly they want a confederacy when you get down to it (not the confederacy though there are some of those too)butt there's a reason we stopped that (no one paid their taxes and we had no money)

SirKibbles fucked around with this message at 02:30 on Sep 3, 2014

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:
So we sent a few troops in to guard diplomatic places in Iraq. Less hope this doesn't implode somehow.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

ReindeerF posted:

Did you see the Pinoy peacekeepers that had to escape in Golan the other day?

:ughh:

Nothing good can come of all this, but I'm not sure what the Hell else you do at this point. Our dick is so far into the mashed potatoes that every answer from a full on withdrawal to a full on occupation is going to have shitloads of blowback.

I feel like if I pretend this might not implode it won't. Back the Kurds I guess like we should've done the first time
even that's not a great solution it's like asking which poo poo sandwich you want to eat and loving Bush is off loving painting or something.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Caros posted:

That isn't her point. Her point is that she considers herself a citizen just the same as a man and feels that the fourteenth amendment already fulfils the goals of the Equal Rights Amendment. The fourteenth amendment says:


The proposed Equal Rights Amendment would read:


I actually agree with the fictional her that it's superfluous. Don't get me wrong, women get treated like poo poo and we don't enforce the fourteenth amendment as well as we should in many cases, but doubling down and saying 'seriously guys... come on!' doesn't seem like it would have much if any real world impact.

The civil rights act is pointless using this thought process. The whole system is built on the fact that everyone is equal more opportunities to show that either it is not living up to that bullshit or actually getting people things they need is not bad.

SirKibbles fucked around with this message at 07:24 on Sep 3, 2014

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:
Are there still more states where you can marry your cousin than gay marriage states or are there finally more gay marriage states?


If Republicans take the Senate alot of the gains we've made on social issues are going to be rolled back.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

zoux posted:

Luckily, the veto.

Honestly considered whether Obama would hold back on using his veto power to look more bipartisan and moderate. That's paranoid of me but the only reason we don't have cuts to SS and medicare is because of the Tea Party being dumb ,so hopefully Obama is legitimately saying gently caress it for once despite all the times we thought he was going to do it before.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Nelson Mandingo posted:

Red states are increasingly turning blue. Any damage done now can be reversed in the decade to come. Once Texas turns blue the game is over.

Obviously but it's still bad for all the people this is going to affect and a decade is a long time for a human in the grand scheme of history this is nothing clearly.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

The problem is that the show gives the softball of softball questions there's no journalism going on there. It has nothing to do with David Gregory being left hahaha ok left leaning because someone has to be the leftists so they can have an excuse for Joe to be on.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/03/koch-brothers-recording_n_5757592.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

Koch brothers continue to write their own anti rich propaganda without meaning to.

edit: Please change my name to minimum wage is fascism tia

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

TLM3101 posted:

All right then. Enlighten me here. Kids are being driven to suicide by hate speech, literally hounded into death with words. How do you solve it? How do you stop kids from being made so miserable by this speech that death seems a preferable alternative than living even one second longer?

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see how standing up and loudly proclaiming that "Nono, it's cool, these people have a right to torment you" is the solution here.

Sometimes people have to die and it's a tragedy but we'd lose freedoms we have now and we might turn into a dictatorship it's like a sacrifice you give say Trayvon Martin for maximum gun rights freedom or if statistics are right 1 in 4 women being raped or sexually assaulted for instance it will never be straight white dudes unless they're poor

Raskolnikov38 posted:

The results of the American experiment is probably one of the better refutations against democracy.

Politicians in the US look at Russia and China with envy,they do not like this democracy or republic poo poo you can tell.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Because I totally wasn't even a little facetious writing that.

People don't understand jokes on this internet comedy forum see: amergin

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Dolash posted:

Dismissing knowing about politics as mere bourgeois affectation is pretty demeaning and patronizing to the average American. Would them getting informed be mere class-based posturing? Does expressing an interest in politics turn someone from that hard-working, just-trying-to-make-ends-meet American to a villainous and elitist liberal?

I wanna see how he reconciles that opinion with socialist party building :allears:

Jerry Manderbilt posted:

Didn't enough of the American electorate eventually go "Aw gently caress it, it's as Bush says, 'can't change a horse midstream'"?

My grandfather voted Gore then Bush because you don't change a president during a war

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Monkey Fracas posted:

Yeah, it's not like it's an impenetrable web of bullshit but there is more than enough bullshit to trip you up and make you mis or underinformed if you don't really care all that much.

And most people don't really care a whole lot if our voting percentages are anything to go by.

Half of the country straight up never votes in anything remember that next time someone talks about mandates.

Nessus posted:

Violence in kind meaning what, here, exactly?

His right to say whatever he wants is more important than person being hypothetically harmed because otherwise we'd become a hypothetical dictatorship it's not a confusing point.

SirKibbles fucked around with this message at 22:52 on Sep 10, 2014

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Trabisnikof posted:

So in your mind, are the Patriot Guard Riders committing violence against the Westboro Baptist Church by limiting their speech?

At the point American politics are so removed from the philosophies that spawned it that you're wasting your time. Whatever he answers will have so many exceptions to the rule that it might as well be a different philosophy. Now any ideology involving humans is going to have exceptions to things because context and poo poo is important also people aren't robots but gently caress me if American politics isn't completely a clusterfuck.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Zeitgueist posted:

Oh gosh, we're trying to out white-knight the American people on this topic, are we?

When I used the statement "bourgeois affection" I meant that most people don't have the time, resources, or energy to follow politics to the level many people do on this board, because they're busy raising families, working 3 jobs, whatever. While it doesn't apply to everyone, most of the folks I know who are active in being political wonks on the internet are either comfortably middle class or higher, or completely out of work(obviously they're not who I'm calling bourgeois).

It's not that an interest in politics is class based posturing, it's that it's a function of class based leisure time for many.


No but calling the people who aren't as informed as you stupid or lazy sure does.


Gee I dunno how I'm going to reconcile my point of the working class not having the time for politics with the general inability of the working class to be active on policies that would benefit them the most.

:allears:

My point is that you pretty much said any one who pays attention or is active in politics has to be middle class which is dumb bullshit and also totally against the basics of socialism

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Zeitgueist posted:

Yeah I got your point, you didn't get mine, which is why you're posting this poo poo.

Read, instead of just waiting for your turn to reply.

Or maybe I got your point and I think it's dumb? That whole Lennist argument hasn't worked. Which means you should probably say hey this isn't working maybe try something different instead of using arguments from 1900s from a guy who's leading an unindustrialized nation and comparing it to an industrialized nation

Trabisnikof posted:

I think there's a distinction to be made between someone saying that there are many institutional reasons that the middle class can be more politically engaged and someone saying absent that repression of the lower class the middle class would still be more politically engaged (which I agree wouldn't be very socialist).

No I understand it's a Leninist argument it hasn't worked.

Trabisnikof posted:

I think there's a distinction to be made between someone saying that there are many institutional reasons that the middle class can be more politically engaged and someone saying absent that repression of the lower class the middle class would still be more politically engaged (which I agree wouldn't be very socialist).

Edit: we live in a weird time where I'm unsure if the middle class is technically Bourgeoisie anymore or just are convinced they still are so as to keep acting like they are.

They aren't it's total bsing they're barely petite bourgeoisie anymore.

SirKibbles fucked around with this message at 23:56 on Sep 10, 2014

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Zeitgueist posted:

No, you don't understand, you're attempting to reword my argument to fit what you expected to hear from me, as your posts indicate.

The reason I know this is that you're mischaracterizing what I've said in a way that makes that obvious.

Read my posts again instead of trying to win arguments on the internet because you want to feel superior. You are getting what I said wrong.

No one's trying to feel superior I just disagree with you

zamin posted:

Technically, the American middle class is mostly proletariat, since the bulk rely on performing wage labor for money. The bourgeoisie doesn't usually start until you get into the upper middle class.

Yeah the whole 401K stuff and general stock investment stuff makes it a grey area though.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

JT Jag posted:

With the rise of the super-wealthy as a class unto themselves in the 150 years since Marx and Engels wrote the Manifesto, I can't help but feel that identifying everyone as either proletariat or bourgeoisie just isn't suitable for today's political enviroment. Proletarians labor, bourgeoise own the means of production, and this new class manipulates the production system without contributing anything themselves. Bourgeoise are the managers. The new class are the CEOs. Bourgeoise own a franchise of McDonalds, the new class are the ones profiting from the percentages of McDonalds franchises worldwide. Bourgeoise might be a consultant for a bank. The new class is an investment banker that makes money off other companies.

The bourgeoise is the vampire sucking the blood of the laborer, but the new class sucks the blood out of the system itself.

Any ideas as to a name?

Seems like a derail so I'm going to answer in the Marx thread.

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3543938

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Doctor Spaceman posted:

Australia's had compulsory voting for decades and there has never been an instance of "localities harassing people by scheduling elections".

The fines a bit much just have mandatory voting and give people a day off.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Grand Prize Winner posted:

If Clinton wins the election all she'll do is spend 4-8 years kowtowing to the far right like Obama did. What the Democratic party desperately needs is a left-wing firebreather, like Bernie Sanders but younger. Warren may fit the bill but she still ain't running, so gently caress it, I'm voting SPUSA.

You're organizing locally though right? Centrists and leftists alike in this country forget you can't just vote and call it a day. The reason the right wing and DLC types can do that is because rich people do all the organizing and fund raising for them, you don't have that option.

SirKibbles fucked around with this message at 07:41 on Sep 16, 2014

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

AVeryLargeRadish posted:

I got for real deja vu reading the last couple pages. Are some of you guys just copying posts you made years ago and pasting them here to mess with me? :tinfoil:

No,somehow they've got it in their heads they're making grand convincing arguments to one another and certainly not wasting time arguing the same old tired arguments. Like what are you going to do. Personally force someone vote Green,mind control them to vote Hilary? It's so pointless.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Radbot posted:

Isn't Zizek basically an accelerationist? He's got some interesting things to say about liberal Band-Aids.

Yeah but take him with a grain of salt (so not very seriously) he makes some good points but some of his politics are stupid and unhelpful. (anything he writes about anarchists as an example)

Joementum posted:

So is Bill Ayers, which by extension means Obama is too. The accelerationism is coming from inside the White House!

Obama's secret Marxist Muslim plan revealed

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Raskolnikov38 posted:

I've never read Zizek, what does he say about anarchists?

Basically remember the last 5 pages or so? Imagine if you were the anarchist and the liberal posters were Zizek and swamp out the liberal points for Centralist (as in central vs say democratic socialism) talking points. The anarchists wanted the USSR to fail,anarchists are sabotaging leftist political movements by wanting perfection etc.

He has other dumb opinions but his position of Anarchism is both dumb and quick to explain in short paragraphs.

SirKibbles fucked around with this message at 15:53 on Sep 17, 2014

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

rear end in a top hat who thinks he's a mod posted:

Goddamn shut up about it. Leftists throwing a hissy fit right before a midterm is hardly a new thing, in fact it's happened before nearly every midterm for a few decades now. Why do you think midterms suck so hard for Dems? Screaming that you want to have things your way RIGHT NOW is just self-indulgent entitlement, and we've heard it all before. Politics is a slow game. Things have already perceptibly shifted just in the last 10-12 years. Not fast enough for you? Please whine about it some more, it's such a pleasure to read.

Put your shoulder into it and help push the shitbox forward, or stand off to the side and criticize and complain about just how unfair it is that the shitbox moves so slowly and everyone should push harder. Either way it's been beaten into the ground in this and many other threads.

Oracle posted:

Which is why you open to ALL (families, but you always say mothers). Your mom/wife works so hard, you think she doesn't deserve a little something more than flowers and a card once a year? How can you say you're for families and children and be against this? Don't you love your mom/wife?

Hell if advertisers can use it to sell diamonds Democrats can use to to sell something actually beneficial.

If you can figure out a way that only white people get it. You can probably pass this in about 3 years. Seriously it's how Social Security and the GI bill passed. Just adding all the minorities in later of course this is speaking from a pure politics level. So just ignore the horrible ethics for this hypothetical.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Joementum posted:

Quote of the day: “I try to stay out of that — all the issues,” said John Boehner on whether he would weigh in on immigration policy.

Wow politicians usually aren't this honest. He's just like gently caress that clusterfuck of stupid. Still won't be enough Tea Party still hates him.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

JT Jag posted:

Ah, so Steve King will be to blame for the ultimate demographic death of the Republican Party in 20-30 years.

The best part about this is it would be really easy for them to pull chunks of the women,black,hispanic demographics but gently caress not being bigots and no way the government does anything useful.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply