|
An interesting analysis / projection, but do you have any polling on that? I can't find anything past 2008, and the polling at that time was (appropriately) dismal.
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2015 18:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 03:24 |
|
memy posted:Is it just me, or does Kasich have really small hands? nobody, not even the rain, has such small hands
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2015 17:24 |
|
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2016 20:58 |
|
Puppy Galaxy posted:Kinda terrified for Are Country right now Consider whether (in light of current polling, Trump's statements, and Trump's acumen or lack thereof) Trump is likely to defeat Hillary (assuming she is the Democratic nominee); this may make you feel better to some degree. e: Also this: Mr. Pumroy posted:embrace terror
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2016 16:21 |
|
TyroneGoldstein posted:If he bullies her, he loses...almost automatically. See, e.g., Rick Lazio.
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2016 16:35 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:He won't walk back the wall because, if you forget for a minute whether it works is relevant, it's a huge makework/national-identity jobs creator and it gives him an excuse to slap tariffs on Mexico and call the benefits of NAFTA into question. While only about half the length of the Ming wall, it would certainly rank as one of the most massive public works programs in history.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2016 01:54 |
|
mcmagic posted:Nah. Trump is still better at this game than he is. I can't imagine Robot Rubio actually being able to beat Trump at Trump's own game - maybe some prepared statements and the surprise factor will carry Rubio forward a bit for now, but over time, and especially in person against a Trump expecting this sort of attack, I just don't see it.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2016 17:46 |
|
My Imaginary GF posted:2016 Republican Primary Thread: "He gay." - Donald J. Trump 2016 Republican Primary Thread: Gay Foam Party
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2016 22:39 |
|
Brannock posted:He's already all but thrown in the towel. He's staying in to prevent his supporters from going to Trump. Is there polling to suggest Kasich supporters would find Trump appealing? They seem like polar opposites as candidates.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2016 23:33 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:i am excited to live in a world where insult comedy decides the nominee of a major political party
|
# ¿ Feb 29, 2016 05:24 |
|
This primary season is truly the gift that keeps on giving. If only it never had to end.
|
# ¿ Feb 29, 2016 05:34 |
|
William Bear posted:Exactly. Nominate someone who isn't Trump, and the GOP loses its legitimacy as an advocate for conservatives. Conservatives spoke! If you're a GOP elected official other than Cruz, you may well conclude there is no good option just now, and that the down ballot impacts are worse letting Trump through than shoehorning Cruz in (even with the loss of credibility associated with denying the win to the plurality candidate). Bonus if you hand the nomination to Cruz: If he loses in the general, which seems likely, you have permanently removed him from at least presidential politics, and, depending on how bad the loss is, diminished him further as a matter of Congressional politics. E: Bizarre auto correct changes reversed. Red Dad Redemption fucked around with this message at 16:44 on Apr 10, 2016 |
# ¿ Apr 10, 2016 16:40 |
|
That DICK! posted:You make a grown man cry I for one am crying tears of joy. Never did I imagine the GOP would nominate something this close to an actual, literal clown. Truth is stranger than fiction I guess. "We lose with everything." The unreflective foreshadowing is wonderful to behold.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 02:18 |
|
This speech is anything but rousing. But even so the crowd is oddly subdued. The golfclapping and halfhearted cheers just feel really off given that he just tied up the race.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 02:24 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:It is a meant as a constant reminder that the sovereignty of our nation is not negotiable, that alone is a good enough reason for a $20Bil Keynesian public make-works project for me. Anything else is gravy. Not just any public works project; given the rhetoric we've heard on its planned scope and beauty, I would envisage a vast, sprawling monument to crony capitalism: a 2000 mile long Trump condominium complex complete with marble, gold trim, artificial waterfalls and snipers to engage the feared interlopers. A wonder that will, like the pyramids of old, require years of backbreaking effort by underpaid laborers in the sweltering Southern heat. Truly it will be glorious.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2016 00:31 |
|
Okonner posted:This Cruz news is perfect. Before it was just Reince and Paul Ryan saying "we'll bend the knee if you just promise to leave our party platform alone". Trump could have gone for that, I doubt he'd care about the differences. But if Trump gets wind that the party platform is now something that Lyin' Ted is trying to steal from him he's going to be way more willing to go scorched earth. Apropos of Trump leaving the core tenets of the party alone: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-reversal-says-wealthy-americans-153448020.html;_ylt=A0LEV7lUqS9XvV4AlyknnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTEyajU3
|
# ¿ May 9, 2016 22:33 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Hillary, for everything else that she is, doesn't have that problem. I've never once seen her lose her cool in a debate, nor have I ever really seen her even stumble over her words in an answer the way Obama did. If she gets on the same stage as Trump, she will goad him into doing something stupid--and because he's Trump, he will take the bait and say something hideously offensive. Hillary devastated Rick Lazio in just that way. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/03/hillary-clinton-rick-lazio-2000-senate-sexism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMJZo4UeTYQ There will be a lot of non-crazy people paying attention to her historic candidacy in the general, and I don't see this sort of thing playing out any better for Trump than it did for Lazio.
|
# ¿ May 31, 2016 22:06 |
|
Montasque posted:2. The Neo-Cons are now with Hillary. wait, what? ~1600 posts since i last checked this thread - lots of neocon support for a third party / never Trump candidate, but i hadn't seen much overt support for HRC. who came out for her yesterday?
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 16:36 |
|
Montasque posted:Jennifer Rubin and Tom Nichols, two neo-con writers. It was less coming out, and more a 'yay Hillary' type moment... They are warming up to her. thank you! just read those pieces and
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 16:52 |
|
shiksa posted:Its been a day and no one from trumps team has been able to cobble a competent response to Hillary Trump's vacuous name calling will, unfortunately, be good enough for many, many people i do hope her briefing will get some coverage, though
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 20:02 |
|
From HRC's Briefing site: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkCcjnCWEAIRfBa.jpg
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 20:13 |
|
"Plane heading for the mountain" Indeed.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2016 02:37 |
|
No Mans Land 2 posted:Haha lets watch everything Trump says and does and try to criticize it all smugly New thread title
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2016 02:55 |
|
Well the Atlantic has excoriated Trump for his speech today. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/trump-speech-orlando/486878/?utm_source=atlfb Highlights: quote:In a fiery, disjointed speech in New Hampshire on Monday, Donald Trump angrily denounced the attacks in Orlando, political correctness, immigration, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and the American Muslim community. quote:Trump’s speech was light on policy, suggesting a belief that if he repeated the phrase “radical Islam” frequently enough, it would solve the problem. While he complained that Obama and Clinton were unwilling to recognize terrorism, he himself put forward no plan for how to counter it, other than attempting to prevent would-be terrorists from entering the United States. (Clinton’s proposals have also been laughably vague.) He did not propose any specific steps for countering ISIS, saying only that he would “have an attorney general, a director of national intelligence, and a secretary of defense who will know how to fight the war on radical Islamic terrorism,” and that NATO should focus more on terrorism. e: But Wait! There's even more: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/trumps-implication-obama-was-involved-in-the-orlando-shooting/486770/?utm_source=atlfb quote:The idea the president is a Manchurian candidate, a mole or agent for jihadism is a stunning accusation, even by the standard of a presidential campaign in which Trump has delivered a series of breathtaking statements, from comparing a rival to a child molester to being unable and unwilling to differentiate one of his policy ideas from Nazi policies. Red Dad Redemption fucked around with this message at 00:00 on Jun 14, 2016 |
# ¿ Jun 13, 2016 23:56 |
|
CalvinCoolidge posted:He's going to destroy her at the debates. Haha yeah that worked great for Rick Lazio.
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 16:11 |
|
if there's anything women love more than mansplaining, it's old bombastic guys with combovers who bully women ~looking forward to the debates~
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 16:15 |
|
Rincewinds posted:The look of Cruz and that guy in the last picture. that was my reaction as well
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 21:00 |
|
use of the word "decrimental" was a nice touch, trolling is so often low effort these days. well done
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 15:01 |
|
Deteriorata posted:Blatantly undemocratic selection processes are looking pretty good these days.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2016 01:40 |
|
Phi230 posted:Is the Republican dream America an America where everybody works in factories on 20 hour shifts with no safety regulation? "We are going to *win* the race to the bottom, folks!"
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2016 16:41 |
|
MaxxBot posted:
Vote for me and you will DESTROY the US economy!
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2016 00:39 |
|
Piquai Souban posted:If it was a sheriff star, then Trump deleting the tweet is proof positive that Trump's campaign is now run by the forces of political correctness, and that PC is so important to his donor-run campaign versus when he was self-funded and independent. Is there an unironically pro Trump corner of the Internet? Because if there were, Trump's requests for donations, submission to GOP spin doctors, etc., would be a glorious opportunity for concern trolling.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2016 16:56 |
|
Slate Action posted:National GE poll - Ipsos/Reuters Surprising that it's this tight among independents. Also, comparing slides 10 and 12, it looks like (in very rough terms) the 29% of independents in the neither / other category break mostly for Gary Johnson (Libertarian) when he's added to the list.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2016 16:11 |
|
rip vile
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 01:31 |
|
Cronodoculous posted:Well that was disgusting and evil.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 01:32 |
|
These speeches are so full of vacuous innuendo: "Blue lives matter!" Who exactly is saying "Cop murder is fine, it's all good"? Statement after statement is like that. How can be persuaded by this?
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 02:30 |
|
go3 posted:revolting over oppression is bad apparently revolting because the federal government doesn't want someone literally stealing public pasturage and offices is also ok they're probably upset Timothy Mcveigh is unavailable to speak
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 02:35 |
|
God Himself is commanding us to kill people thousands of miles away to protect the interests of America Allahuu Akbar!
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 02:48 |
|
A commander in chief who insults Muslims and launches a ground invasion of Syria!
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 02:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 03:24 |
|
Pen Expers posted:Hell is on the way New thread title
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 02:51 |