Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Brannock posted:


It still mystifies me how a state like Wisconsin can turn out standouts like La Follette, Russ Feingold, and Tammy Baldwin, but also turn right around and produce Joseph McCarthy, Paul Ryan, and Scott Walker.

My theory is that closer proximity to Proper Leftism deepens the political force that reactionarianism can command.

McCarthy, for instance, was contemporary with the socialist party's rule over Milwaukee. It makes sense that when your largest city is run by outright socialists - when it is, in fact, the only major american city that can claim this - then anti-socialist hysteria would become a particularly potent factor in your state's politics. Couple this with wisonsin's rural population balance and the gee-gosh-why-can't-people-just-be-left-alone conservatism typical of rural midwestern homesteaders.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Were those photos taken after that one Sikh temple in Wisconsin got shot up

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Wonder if Sandoval will end up on a Veep shortlist now that he's not running for the Senate.

Trump/Sandoval 2016 would be pretty great, albeit not as great as Trump/Martinez.

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

I will go against the grain and say that I appreciate Scott Walker's aethetic values.

His desire is to resemble schlubby middle-management guys everywhere.
Why he wishes to do this is a mystery to me, since pretty much everybody hates their damned supervisor, but there is a certain clarity of purpose there that I can admire.

what I'm getting at is he reminds me of Mr. Cogswell from the Jetsons, but with slightly more hair.

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Gravel Gravy posted:

Nobody would vote for us if we ran. If this guy was a politician and can't get a single vote then why should we care?

I'll have you know that My Ole Ma would vote for me

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that the senate's most notorious warhawk made a bad candidate in 2008 - a year when america was knee-deep in two expensive and increasingly-unpopular wars - regardless of past willingness to break with his party on domestic policy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Tigntink posted:

Carter started off his presidency by pardoning everyone who draft dodged.
He created the Department of Energy and Education. He even put solar panels on top of the white house to show support for getting away from foreign oil. He's always been a promoter of new technologys that make our lives better.

In his time in Georgia he was aggressively anti segregation. He trolled the KKK by putting up MLK portraits all over the state house.

Honestly the only real negative mark on his presidency was the hostage crisis which was obviously extremely fubar'ed up by Reagan. Also Americans really hate being told that they need to get with the loving program and stop being horrible members of earth.

Post presidency - The Carter Center does fantastic work to eradicate 3rd world diseases. He is also a big habitat for humanity guy.
Carter also negotiated with a madman and got North Korea to let inspectors keep an eye on their atomic program.

Carter's main issue wasn't anything to do with policy, but, rather, that he brought in an outsider staff that didn't understand the importance of schmoozing the correct people.

The Carter administration is the best example of how the electorate can never really escape Establishment Politics.

  • Locked thread