|
free tbp |
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 20:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 20:38
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 20:42
|
|
|
|
My feedback is that truthposting should not be probateable anywhere and thus free BAFH |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 20:44
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 20:54
|
|
|
|
Equine Don posted:Please "free" the large animation fan. Yeah, I want his dead monk necklace. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 21:01
|
|
|
|
Trabandiumium posted:Free BAFH |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 21:04
|
|
|
Mod Feedback: I'm glad the old Mod Feedback thread was closed. It was too big for it's purpose. Suggestion: Make a new feedback thread every month much like the military threads in GiP. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 21:16
|
|
|
|
Misandrist Wytch posted:Reposting from last thread: This part is useless because everyone believes the same things in D&D, hope that helps |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 21:23
|
|
|
probably a beagle or other dog. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 21:49
|
|
|
KoldPT posted:This part is useless because everyone believes the same things in D&D, hope that helps What are they arguing about then? |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 21:50
|
|
|
|
Misandrist Wytch posted:What are they arguing about then? Trying to break the record on longest outrage olympics. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 22:02
|
|
|
D&D is like if politicians ran disney world. Each thread a separate theme park. I/P is the magic kingdom. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 22:05
|
|
|
|
Ralp. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 22:35
|
|
|
|
ralps knew |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 22:40
|
|
| imo D&D should be a subforum of GiP | |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 23:04
|
|
|
-Troika- posted:imo D&D should be a subforum of GiP pls no |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 23:21
|
|
|
qnqnx posted:Trying to break the record on longest outrage olympics. That's a debate and discussion. That means its a valid argument in the Debate and Discussion forum. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 23:28
|
|
|
DEBATE RESULT: Anime Sandwich vs KoldPt and qnxx Winner: Anime Sandwich +5 points, logic -2 points, negative post count In College Multiplier: x 2 TOTAL: 6 points Losers: KoldPt and qnxx -5 points, ad hominem -10 points, known trolls. Total: -15 points Losers: Change belief systems or get probated repeatedly. Debate resolved. Have a nice day. |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 23:33
|
|
|
|
wow, the new anime sandwich debate model really efficiently solves debates |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 23:38
|
|
|
|
my pog boyfriend posted:wow, the new anime sandwich debate model really efficiently solves debates i agree, mods can we implement this? also D&D should have scoreboards so people can see where they stand and how the scoring system works. we can usher a new era of conversation |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 23:42
|
|
|
|
my pog boyfriend posted:wow, the new anime sandwich debate model really efficiently solves debates Yes, i'm defiantly in favor of using it for d&d |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2014 23:43
|
|
|
|
Free Big Anime Fan Here. Make him mod of QCS. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 00:14
|
|
|
|
Hitlers Gay Secret posted:Mod Feedback: I'm glad the old Mod Feedback thread was closed. It was too big for it's purpose. Suggestion: Get in touch with some real life GiP soldiers and fire ralp out of a cannon. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 01:24
|
|
|
Hi everyone. If you don't have actual feedback pertaining to a moderator or administrator of the forums, do not post here. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 01:28
|
|
|
my pog boyfriend posted:wow, the new anime sandwich debate model really efficiently solves debates Hm, I disagree. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 01:42
|
|
|
|
Misandrist Wytch posted:DEBATE RESULT: Anime Sandwich vs KoldPt and qnxx this would be a wicked forums game for a moderator to facilitate |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
|
Make sjw a bannable catchphrase. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 02:23
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Make sjw a bannable catchphrase. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 02:46
|
|
Misandrist Wytch posted:as a punishment the loser has to now believe the same thing the winner does. +1 |
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 02:54
|
|
Ralp posted:Hi everyone. If you don't have actual feedback pertaining to a moderator or administrator of the forums, do not post here. So it must be specific to a or multiple people, and not a general modification feed back? ? |
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 02:56
|
|
Ralp posted:Hi everyone. If you don't have actual feedback pertaining to a moderator or administrator of the forums, do not post here. My Admin feedback was this was a huge step forward in taking a shot across the bow versus being normal Ralp Gay, so what. Keep working though its a deep furrow of gayness. |
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 02:58
|
|
|
i just wanted to tell ralp, out of the blue, that he is strong, manly, and desirable. do u have a girlfriend? y(_) n(_) |
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 03:39
|
|
|
|
Ok here is some serious and probably autistic mod feedback for the D&D moderators (XyloJW, etc) from someone who is mostly a lurker: I am not a regular of D&D but recently became interested in the forum due to some of the recent events in the media like the shooting of Mike Brown. I noticed that (in my subjective opinion) it seems like a very cliquish forum where posters with opposing viewpoints are not treated with good faith by most of the existing posters there. These opinions are usually dismissed as trolling, or the posters are subjected to a barrage of ad hominem attacks with the moderators often looking the other way (again subjectively speaking here). Here's an example of what I mean by the mods looking the other way. I posted some examples of really bad posts from 11/25/14 in the now closed D&D feedback thread: zoux posted:You are literally a racist irl. Pomp posted:There's no point in trying to debate racists, and dismissing them outright is the best course of action, hth WORST FORUMS GUY posted:You are mentally ill lol XyloJW agreed they were bad posts but said he was doing "containment on the worst of the worst until it blows over" whatever that means: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3683170&pagenumber=5&perpage=40#post438215674 I checked later and none of the posters of the admittedly "bad posts" were punished. Meanwhile, someone else posted this in QCS as an example of a supposedly bad D&D probation: Narciss posted:You seem to be implying that this case says anything about white-on-black racism; it doesn't. It was a police officer acting in self-defense, with a legitimate fear for his life. The racial identities of the involved parties are totally ancillary to the case. I actually thought that Officer Wilson was Black and Mr. Brown was white, for awhile, because I don't really think about race much and can easily picture a black man being a police officer and a man named Mr. Brown being white. Now, I am not arguing that this probation was necessarily bad, since I think that the "thought Office Wilson was Black and Mr. Brown was white" comment is pretty dumb, but it is no way nearly as bad as the small selection of posts I pointed out to XyloJW where people are just posting trash personal attacks without any meaningful arguments whatsoever. At the very least, Narciss is posting his argument in good faith, however dumb people may consider it to be. All of the above posts were posted in the same thread on the same day, so the excuse of "it's too hard to moderate the thread with so many posts" or whatever doesn't really hold up. This is just one example from a very recent thread, but it seems to be a consistent problem with many threads in D&D. As someone who really tries to understand both sides of an argument before making an opinion on something, it is really off-putting to consistently see D&D regulars with the "correct" opinions get a free pass while posters with subjectively "bad" opinions seem to be disproportionately punished by the moderators. I think that it would be a huge improvement to the quality of D&D if the moderators would aggressively punish posters that are not posting in good faith and post things like personal attacks. It would help to encourage a much better diversity in opinions which is interesting and fun to read, rather than an echo chamber. The lack of diverse opinions on SA is probably the biggest complaint I have with the current state of D&D and some of the other forums too. It's simply not fun to read a bunch of cliquish posts where everyone agrees with each other and people with other viewpoints are dismissed as being racist, mentally ill, or sexist or whatever without any actual debate or reasoning. Even if I vehemently disagree with someone, I would much much rather read a well thought out argument of an opposing viewpoint that may enlighten me to change my stance on a topic, than useless circlejerk posts which serve absolutely zero purpose other than mental masturbation. Anyway, feel free to ignore my probably badly written feedback that I wrote with like 2 hours of sleep due to my bronchitis, but I really hope the mods take it to heart since I still really enjoy reading some of the forums here, and overall at the end of the day I think the mods do a pretty decent job all thinks considered. Thanks! |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 03:41
|
|
Izumi Konata posted:i just wanted to tell ralp, out of the blue, that he is strong, manly, and desirable. I am one of the biggest loving retards on this site, my comedic stylings most comparable to a grieving 9/11 widow, yet you outpace me at such a rate at being a tremendous human being that I shudder to think what demon you made a deal with to be such a homo. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) |
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 03:43
|
|
|
|
Angstrom posted:Now, I am not arguing that this probation was necessarily bad, since I think that the "thought Office Wilson was Black and Mr. Brown was white" comment is pretty dumb, but it is no way nearly as bad as the small selection of posts I pointed out to XyloJW where people are just posting trash personal attacks without any meaningful arguments whatsoever. At the very least, Narciss is posting his argument in good faith, however dumb people may consider it to be. All of the above posts were posted in the same thread on the same day, so the excuse of "it's too hard to moderate the thread with so many posts" or whatever doesn't really hold up. This is just one example from a very recent thread, but it seems to be a consistent problem with many threads in D&D. Actually, Narciss is a (really good at his job) troll, so he's not really posting in good faith. Your other points were mostly fine though, and I hope folks read them. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 03:51
|
|
|
|
ArfJason posted:(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) looks like we found an even bigger homo (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 03:51
|
|
|
|
ArfJason posted:I am one of the biggest loving retards on this site, my comedic stylings most comparable to a grieving 9/11 widow, yet you outpace me at such a rate at being a tremendous human being that I shudder to think what demon you made a deal with to be such a homo. You're too hard on yourself my friend. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 04:02
|
|
|
|
ArfJason posted:I am one of the biggest loving retards on this site, my comedic stylings most comparable to a grieving 9/11 widow, yet you outpace me at such a rate at being a tremendous human being that I shudder to think what demon you made a deal with to be such a homo. no "fyad posting" in qcs dumbass  user losing posting privleges until i stop crying(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 04:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:08 |
|
|
|
Angstrom posted:The lack of diverse opinions on SA is probably the biggest complaint I have with the current state of D&D and some of the other forums too. It's simply not fun to read a bunch of cliquish posts where everyone agrees with each other and people with other viewpoints are dismissed as being racist, mentally ill, or sexist or whatever without any actual debate or reasoning. Even if I vehemently disagree with someone, I would much much rather read a well thought out argument of an opposing viewpoint that may enlighten me to change my stance on a topic, than useless circlejerk posts which serve absolutely zero purpose other than mental masturbation. I think getting rid of megathreads might help address this, since you wouldn't have posters that have been in the same thread for months or years. But I'm not sure what the solution actually is, other than to get a whole new crop of posters. |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2014 04:06
|
|
