|
|
http://www.theonion.com/articles/venus-added-to-registry-of-historically-significan,37928/ check that out, they say they're adding venus to the register of historic planets, but look at the photo: that's venus imaged without an atmosphere! its even weirder because the article credits its ultra-thick atmosphere as a reason to add it. very contradictory message here. they should talk to their photoshoppers... |
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 19:46 |
|
|
|
it looks cooler without an atmosphere tbh, if I were venus I would totally pose without it |
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
|
Ivy posted:it looks cooler without an atmosphere tbh, if I were venus I would totally pose without it agreed I guess, it does look cooler, it's just the plaque in the foreground clearly isn't radar-imaged, also why does it have that weird booster on it and why is it firing? still getting into position? would be weird for it to burn directly toward the planet, wasteful |
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 04:43
|
|
|
the atmosphere adds a few extra pounds.
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2015 11:39
|
|
