|
Reminder that the Jackie Lambie Network will soon be a registered Australian political party and the Democrats won't
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2015 11:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 18:14 |
|
|
Endman posted:I'm a Greens member, mystery avatar buyer. You done hosed up. cpaf posted:Reminder that the Jackie Lambie Network will soon be a registered Australian political party and the Democrats won't I think they had the hope of doing the whole first page and probably just ran out of money and effort, just like the real democrats e: rip riker Thinking fucked around with this message at 22:09 on Mar 31, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
Zenithe posted:Why is everyone relentlessly making fun of a party that has far better policies than most parties? Because there aren't any LNP or ALP faithful here left except for Graic and this screamingllama dude talks a lot of horseshit. Also because the democrats similarly talked a lot of big talk throughout history and ultimately hosed over everyday Australians anyway
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 02:43
|
|
|
Graic Gabtar posted:That's a loving bleak outlook if your relying on me as your counterpoint. Or if you feel in the mood for reading a long list of shouty reasons to kill yourself or explanations of why you should be dead and other similarly calm and coherent political assertions
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
Anidav posted:The Democrats are fine, I mean my new job just finished a poll in FNQ and in comparison to people up there saying they should legalize hunting aboriginals after hearing about Billy Gordon. Parties like the Dems, Socialist Alliance or Australian Progressive Party are the least of our problems in the face of extreme racism, poverty, welfare depletion, high education lockouts for poorer classes and so much more. -- Someone who voted for Campbell Newman in 2012
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Yeah my vote in 2012 was a protest vote because Anna Bligh was bonkers. In retrospect it probably should of been for The Greens but you probably know by now I have a capacity to learn from wrong choices or ill-informed opinions which is much better than some other posters who keep coming in, spout the same poo poo and the same wombo-combo mouse trap springs on them every time, killing them for atleast 48 hours. *nuzzles hair while in headlock*
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
Anidav you're basically auspol's poo poo-eating little brother
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
hiddenmovement posted:I pretty much only come in here in the hope that Cartoon or Quantum Mechanic make a decent post about a real topic. April 1st has thus far been a dissapointment Along with every other day l m a o
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:Fairly sure that's not true. Both of these statements seem dubious, imo
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 06:04
|
|
|
kingcom posted:So the reason slaves were notreally used to construct the pyramids is because most of the time slaves weren't stone masons with years of training an expertise or even apprentices to stone masons. This proved a pretty solid decision when 1000 years later they were still standing. The pyramids didn't really involve complex mathematics or engineering though and they also didn't need really talented stone masons, they just needed vast amounts of physical labor. If you want a cool contemporary civilization that didn't spend all its free time building useless triangle graves in the desert you should look at the babylonians
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 06:41
|
|
|
thatfatkid posted:You are stupid and dumb. markgreyam posted:
Splode posted:Holy poo poo this is painfully stupid even for you This is biting criticism from some of the most intellectual posters in the thread, but it's true. Ancient Egyptian theoretical mathematics was rudimentary compared to contemporaneous Babylonians. They didn't use complicated construction methods. They didn't use pulleys or the wheel, they just pulled big slabs of stone up mud slopes. Architecturally speaking they are just big pyramids made from stone and gypsum with a handful of tunnels inside. The surveying techniques used in creating them are impressive but really they are feats of human effort not human design, which explains the slavery misnomer. They are awesome, massive constructions but they are not theoretically complicated by any means.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 09:09
|
|
I can't tell if this was serious.
|
thatfatkid posted:You are stupid and dumb. This is speaking as a civil engineer with experience in bulk earthwork projects. Thanks for giving me a comprehensive explanation as to why a stone pyramid is as technologically sophisticated as the holes in the ground you have expertise in digging
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 09:26
|
|
|
thatfatkid posted:You seem to have bulk earthworks confused with mining. Just stop you don't know what you are talking about. Congratulations on being a civil engineer who doesn't understand the pyramid is a simple architectural concept then, I guess
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 09:33
|
|
|
Actually, bulk earthworks involves not digging into the ground, furthermore
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 09:36
|
|
|
thatfatkid posted:Architecture =/= Construction. You don't know what you are talking about, just stop. It's no wonder you melted down when this thread pulled you up on your misogynistic attitude to Julia Gillard, you're a child
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 10:23
|
|
|
Yeah sorry for breaking the trend in this thread of reasonable discussion lmao
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 10:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 18:14 |
|
|
thatfatkid posted:My meltdown? My misogynistic attitude to Julia Gillard? The gently caress are you on about? Get your head checked mate. http://forums.somethingawful.com/query.php?action=posthistory&userid=173095
|
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2015 10:37
|
|