|
Fangz posted:I'd say that you are probably putting too much detail into sketching and the colour sketch. You can work a lot faster if you keep sketching very simple and move straight into inking and colouring, fixing as you go. I had a go at trying to do that picture as quickly as I can and this is what I ended up with: Very flattering to have a drawing of mine redrawn unconditionally like that. I would like to keep my early sketches simple but it's so ingrained in me now to do the exact opposite. I'm very curious what the process looks like for someone with a very lineart-heavy style. Like yours, for example! Unless it really does take an eternity. Also. MUSH, BIRD
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2016 02:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 14:12 |
|
This is shaping up to be my favorite one of these. And it's a guy who's gotten his rear end kicked. Not because he's bad or anything. He's probably just outnumbered. And there's at least one ninja. Edit: Weeeeeeeeee Scribblehatch fucked around with this message at 17:36 on Mar 18, 2016 |
# ¿ Mar 17, 2016 08:01 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34m0bJti6h0
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2016 22:46 |
|
Vermain posted:These are both really great. Would you ever consider doing a timelapse? I'd love to see your full process in action. In other news, this!:
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2016 10:40 |
|
Yeah in the sketch phase things that should have thinner lines will have thicker ones. But as long as I get the gist of the shapes in that meantime. And now I'm juggling two pieces!
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 01:55 |
|
This one didn't turn out as intended after the sketch phase. There was a way of coloring it I had in my head that I couldn't bring to hand. But I still like it. Just, argh tho.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2016 06:00 |
|
I'm continuing in that vein. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N16d4H6qQto
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2016 10:58 |
|
Elsa posted:what was the inspiration behind the design of those mushroom-tipped sticks? And aren't mushrooms mushroom-tipped sticks?
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2016 10:45 |
|
Huzzah! That took awhile.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2016 18:32 |
|
There wasn't so much a rule as me being afraid of adding too many layers to an already bulky file that was lagging my tits off. That's my tactic with color because I never have a palette in mind going in. I keep everything seperate so I can adjust them all later. And aside from the lag it seems to work. But I envy the gently caress out of people able to do it all on just 7 layers or so.
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2016 01:13 |
|
8 gigs here. How tough/expensive is it to upgrade that sorta thing for this purpose?
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2016 01:20 |
|
Well poo poo. Does that mean I'm done at 8 gb?
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2016 02:19 |
|
Sheeeyyiit. Well look at you. That fixed everything significant and I wish I'd done it.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2016 05:27 |
|
I think if there's anything you might consider there to be an issue with, just leave a link to it without the image popping up (with a warning) and it should be fine. No one can complain after that, I don't think.
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2016 20:15 |
|
I got the impression that all the tan-colored parts were soft padding. Until I saw the headpieces and realized it was just a coincidence.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 07:31 |
|
Yes. And frankly, I'd prefer anything to inactivity.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 16:48 |
|
I am posting these things now.
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 15:16 |
|
Troposphere posted:some artists are able to keep their fetishes from showing and creeping everyone out, unlike some people, who may or may not post in this thread You can stop telling us.
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 17:55 |
|
Scathach posted:Hell at least if someone is creeped out they're getting emotion from the art. I mean that's better than boredom. Hell fuckin yeah we can, son. They told her she could become anything she wanted. So she became a sheep. Gameboy Frog. Harp seal cuddle puddle A taekwon rabbit lady, if one had to guess.
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 18:11 |
|
Yeah, we got it. You have no witches left to burn, and torches out the wazoo. The thread has stayed dead for a long while. Let's leave the oak stake out for a little while and see what happens.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2016 10:28 |
|
Impartial judge here. I definitely like that touch up. Immediately jumped out at me more than the previous, whereas I liked it a lot already.
|
# ¿ Sep 19, 2016 07:20 |
|
You might like what happens when you turn off the density on the brushes you use, approaching a piece like that. It's been my experience that density settings really mess you around.
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2016 12:43 |
|
That's good. Let's keep that sort of thing going.Colon Semicolon posted:Who cares, god
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2016 07:14 |
|
Troposphere posted:objectifying 9:43 If something is uninteresting to you, that should be enough. Just say that. That's damning enough as it is. You don't need the moral crusade to temper your argument. Jesus. There's this wonderful South Park two-parter where Cartman wants to get Family Guy cancelled for insulting islam, but his real beef is with all the cutaway gags with no setup or payoff. And that second thing should BE ENOUGH of a criticism. Scribblehatch fucked around with this message at 01:36 on Oct 2, 2016 |
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 01:23 |
|
Two responses there: - Did that happen? - You're a person too.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 01:59 |
|
I'd rather you respond to the other thing I said, but that just now meant nothing of the sort happened.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:05 |
|
Can't rebut him, huh. That's okay.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:23 |
|
Nuns with Guns posted:do you genuinely think linking 20 year old footage of a stuffy british white guy saying objectification isn't real was some devastating defense of your love of anime tits? Can you rebut him?
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:31 |
|
So you can't? Alright. I guess that's fine.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:36 |
|
I wouldn't even know what genders you were if you weren't constantly telling me. And it's not like I remember. So yeah, Hanlon's Razor or something, innit
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:39 |
|
Shittily drawn would be enough of an insult. Just roll with that, it works well. Insults work so much better when they're demonstrable.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:42 |
|
Alaois posted:christopher hitchens was a massive loving idiot who thought that women couldn't be funny because of evolution, that a woman's place was at home raising children and should never work, and was anti-abortion. Oh come come sir. Be fair, will you?
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:45 |
|
They speak pretty well. They're entire scenes that everyone has access to. Media does this sometimes, and it's handy. The Simpsons episode Homer Badman for example predicted the future. Anyone can watch Homer Badman. I'd recommend it too. "They're irrelevant because they're old." Well, Nuh Uh Times Infinity to that.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:52 |
|
Gosh you guys are all fire and brimstone about this, ey. All one must do is stay calm to see more.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 02:58 |
|
That's essentially what I've done, yes. Less meme-y tho. Never really cared for that one. I would never abbreviate a three letter word.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 03:04 |
|
Hey whoa stop telling me how to feel, you scalywag.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 14:26 |
|
Wowporn posted:people very quickly explained why that guy talking and loving south park are terrible arguments for your position But it will really put me in my place once they do. Scribblehatch fucked around with this message at 15:51 on Oct 2, 2016 |
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 15:49 |
|
That? You're serious.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 15:56 |
|
2 years ago I probably would've found this mighty intimidating.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 16:57 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 14:12 |
|
Oh be honest. With yourself, particularly.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 17:04 |