Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Mandy Thompson
Dec 26, 2014

by zen death robot


Turkey has been getting really aggressive about the above photo, attacking websites that fail to pull it down, including banning Youtube, Twitter, and Facebook for a few days. Eventually, the ban was lifted when the sites complied with a Turkish court order to censor the photo but this is not the first time this is happened. In essence, those sites are censoring free speech from outside of Turkey.

quote:

Google Dodges a Ban in Turkey Over Hostage Photo


ISTANBUL — Google was spared on Tuesday from a recent wave of Internet bans in Turkey after it reportedly complied with a court order to remove links to images of Mehmet Selim Kiraz, a prosecutor who died after leftist militants took him hostage at an Istanbul courthouse last week.

Twitter and YouTube were temporarily blocked in Turkey on Monday after they failed to respond to an order to remove photographs and other content showing one of the hostage takers pointing a gun at Mr. Kiraz’s head during the assault.

Senior government officials have criticized the publication of the photographs, branding the images terrorist propaganda and citing the lack of consideration for the victim’s family and friends. News outlets that showed the images were not granted access to cover the prosecutor’s funeral.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE

President Hassan Rouhani of Iran, left, and Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, in a photograph released by the ayatollah’s website.Turkey and Iran Put Tensions Aside, for a DayAPRIL 7, 2015
The funeral for the prosecutor Mehmet Selim Kiraz was off limits for Turkish newspapers that ran a photo of him in captivity.Turkey Blocks YouTube and, Briefly, Twitter Over Hostage PhotoAPRIL 6, 2015
Mourners at the funeral of the prosecutor Mehmet Selim Kiraz on Wednesday in Istanbul.Raid to Rescue Hostage in Istanbul Ends in DeathMARCH 31, 2015
A hallmark of the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been a crackdown on freedom of expression.Islamist Websites in Turkey Manage to Evade Strict Internet CensorshipMARCH 13, 2015
Two Turkish women in a cafe in Istanbul hoped to connect to Twitter on Friday after the prime minister tried to shut it down.In Turkey, Twitter Roars After Effort to Block ItMARCH 21, 2014
People on social media in Turkey, accustomed to similar bans in recent years, easily circumvented the restriction on Twitter by using services to mask their Internet protocol access points, and in a few hours the hashtag #twitterisblockedinturkey became a trending topic.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED IN OPINION

Editorial: Turkey’s Battle With TwitterAPRIL 17, 2014
Facebook was the first to follow the court’s instructions to remove photographs, as well as audio and other visual content related to the episode. The social media site remained accessible from Turkey throughout the legal wrangling.

Access to Twitter was re-established Monday evening. YouTube stayed blocked for a few hours longer.

In a separate court ruling on Monday, the authorities gave Google four hours to comply with the restrictions.

“Google is different from hosting providers like Twitter or YouTube. It is a major search engine,” Burcak Unsal, an expert in digital law, said. “It may take days to clear Google content when it gets constantly re-added, so the company must have ensured that it has started the process to evade the ban.”

Some see the recent restrictions on the Internet as an early sign of efforts by the governing Justice and Development Party to curb freedom of expression and to silence dissenting voices before national elections in June.

Twitter’s latest transparency report showed that Turkey made the second-largest number of requests for data information, after the United States, in the second half of 2014.

“The government knows that social media networks are the best venue for free and critical thinking, which makes them nervous,” said Yaman Akdeniz, a professor at Bilgi University in Istanbul who specializes in digital law. He cited legislative changes last year that made it much easier to restrict access to the Internet.

“This is part of an intimidation campaign on the Internet before June elections,” he added.


quote:

Turkey Lists Social Media as Top Threat in Leaked Document
BY JACK MOORE 4/7/15 AT 1:09 PM
http://www.newsweek.com/social-media-listed-top-threat-turkeys-national-security-alongside-isis-320186

A draft of a document detailing perceived threats to Turkey authored by the country’s National Security Council (NSC) has listed social media as one of the main threats to Turkey’s domestic security, alongside terror groups such as ISIS and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), local media reports have revealed.

Eight national security threats are listed in the version of the 2015 National Security Policy Document (NSPD), published by Yenisfak, a Turkish daily that is largely pro-government. The threats include protests, parallel state structures, communication security, social media, cyber security, security of capital movements, organisations that “exploit” religion, such as ISIS, and ethnic-based terrorism, specifically the PKK.

The NSC, the body which created the draft of threats, consists of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish government, and commanders of the Turkish Armed Forces, therefore the composition of the draft strongly reflects the views of the ruling AKP party.

Try Newsweek for only $1.25 per week

Yesterday, a Turkish court briefly banned social media sites Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, along with 160 other websites, for permitting users to circulate images of a prosecutor, Mehmet Selim Kiraz, being held at gunpoint by a masked man from a radical leftist group.

Access to the three major social media sites has been restored after they removed the image from their platforms. Turkish authorities also threatened to outlaw Google until the tech giant moved to prevent the photo of Kiraz being shared.

Turkish premier Erdogan has previously referred to sites such as Twitter as a “menace” as it has been used by Turkish citizens to mobilise anti-government protests against his ruling Justice and Development (AKP) party’s rule. He reacted to a spate of online leaks in March last year by banning Twitter and YouTube after recordings implicated him and senior Turkish officials in a corruption scandal.

Turkish analysts believe that the ruling elite within Turkey feel threatened by dissent on social media with Erdogan’s AKP colleague and prime minister Ahmet Davutoglu heading into a general election in June.

Yaman Akdeniz, a Turkish law professor who successfully challenged the Turkish ban on Twitter and YouTube last year, says that the Turkish government’s actions in regard to social media are having a “chilling effect on freedom of expression” within the country.

“The government sees the social media platforms as a threat because they cannot control it. It is the only platform left for people to express themselves freely,” he notes. “So, they are trying hard to control it by not only issuing vague and disproportionate blocking orders but also by initiating criminal investigations and prosecutions involving postings on social media platforms.”

Since the block on the social media sites on Monday, the hashtag #twitterisblockedinTurkey was tweeted 68,000 times, according to social search engine Topsy.

Erdogan and the ruling AKP may be using a crackdown on social media to play to shore up their core vote ahead of the June election, says Ilhan Tanir, Washington D.C.-based Turkey analyst.

“They know that they cannot ban the social media companies. But, by making [Twitter and Facebook] enemies, they are making an argument for their conservative base that there is an enemy against them and they are out there to get them,” Tanir says.

“This includes Western powers, lobbies and all of the conspiracy theories that they have been spreading. Social media is just another part of this campaign tool that they are using.”

In January, Erdogan claimed that Turkey has the freest media in the world despite a number of arrests of journalists opposed to his rule. Last December, the editor of the country’s biggest-selling newspaper was arrested in raids along with 26 others.

“I am saying this assertively. There is no media either in Europe or in other countries in the world where the media is as free as it is in Turkey. We all know this,” he told Turkish ambassadors at a lunch, according to Turkish outlet Today’s Zaman.

“Attack the president or the prime minister in those countries if you can. No, you cannot. You cannot do this in the U.S., in Germany or in Russia.”


Also happened last year

quote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/opinion/turkeys-battle-with-twitter.html

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the combative prime minister of Turkey, has called Twitter “the worst menace to society,” and he seems intent on intimidating its users.

After the government blocked Twitter in Turkey for two weeks recently, the company’s executives met this week with officials in Mr. Erdogan’s administration to discuss its various demands. The government has been railing against the company and other Internet platforms like YouTube because some Turks have used them to post leaks from a corruption investigation that has implicated prominent political figures, including Mr. Erdogan, and their families. Two weeks ago, Turkey’s highest court ordered the government to unblock Twitter.

Separately, Twitter has agreed to prevent some posts from being seen in Turkey, though they remain viewable in the rest of the world. The government also wants the company to open an office in Turkey, pay taxes on advertising revenue and reveal the identities of people publishing the leaks.

The company has not said whether it would turn over information about users to the Turkish authorities. In the past, it has refused to reveal user data in some cases; in other circumstances, it has given up the information when ordered to do so by a court. According to the company’s semiannual transparency report, it received 1,410 requests for account information from various governments worldwide in the last six months of 2013. The company produced at least some user information in 50 percent of those cases. It received fewer than 10 requests from Turkey and 833 requests from the United States.

If the Turkish government tries to compel Twitter to reveal the users’ identities, the company should certainly strongly resist what is clearly a politically motivated action. Complying with such demands would aid Mr. Erdogan’s administration in its persecution of critics and political opponents. The Committee to Protect Journalists reports that Turkey is the “world’s top press jailer” and imprisoned 40 journalists as of Dec. 1. Most have been held on terrorism or other anti-state charges, which are often used to silence and punish dissidents.

Pretty messed up in my opinion. Though, I will say, to be fair. While it seems unfair for the rest of the internet to be beholden to the laws of Turkey and hurt feelings, its worth pointing out these sites comply with US law with little fuss, to the point where they collaborated with the unconstitutional PRISM program of mass surveillance. In effect, the rest of the world is beholden to the culture, laws, and liberalism of the United States, including mass surveillance and censorship.

The truth is, virtually every country in the world believes in some form of internet censorship. Most of us I would hope would agree that child pornography should be illegal. Other countries have that attitude towards hate speech and harassment. Who should decide?

Mandy Thompson fucked around with this message at 05:03 on Apr 8, 2015

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe
Haven't they banned and unbanned youtube and twitter like 5000 times at this point? It's really lost its impact at this point.

Mandy Thompson
Dec 26, 2014

by zen death robot

Nintendo Kid posted:

Haven't they banned and unbanned youtube and twitter like 5000 times at this point? It's really lost its impact at this point.

Yeah but occasionally those sites comply with Turkey's stupid demands to not hurt Erdogan's fe-fes

Frogfingers
Oct 10, 2012
This guy, Erdowan, imprisons journalists for either posting "insults" or even just liking them on Facebook. He wants so badly to be a cult of personalty in the vein of Putin, but he has none of the competence, and he is routinely scandalised because his family does dumb, corrupt stuff and without fail, someone is there with a camera or a voice recorder to catch them out. What a petty poo poo. I'm sure Turkey will be admitted into the EU they throw him into the Aegean, because he just jumps from one abuse of power to another. His entourage are a bunch of lovely gentlemen as well.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/.premium-1.591647

GenderSelectScreen
Mar 7, 2010

I DON'T KNOW EITHER DON'T ASK ME
College Slice
Turkey is the only country with a ban on burning their flag. Plus they can jail you for talking poo poo about their retarded founder Aatrek I mean Ataturk.

EDIT: In a free country I can say stuff like my founding fathers thought black people were inferior and not worthy of citizenship, and not get in trouble.

Frogfingers
Oct 10, 2012
From the impression I get from Turkish people talking about him, he was a net good; he ended the royal and religious stranglehold over the justice system, instituted quality (women make up a majority of professional academics to this day) but things like secularising society and reforming the language system were such a radical cultural change, there's sort of an elastic snapback from it to this day, with the emergence of non-secular parties, etc. It wasn't a system that supported people equally in terms of class. People needed to relearn how to read and write since the alphabet was changed from Arabic script to Latin, and back then schools and such were only in major cities, and Turkey is one of those countries that has a deep city/country divide to this day.

In fact Erdowan bases his power from provincial seats. He is not popular in any major city that I know of. European-connected city dwellers recognise him for what he is, but he still garners support in Turkey because he's developing provincial areas, and redeveloping unsympathetic urban pockets in a neo-liberal way. In fact, I remember seeing a documentary about this communist group a couple of years before the kidnapping, and the gist was that the historical neighbourhood was set to be demolished and gentrified to scatter the communists into the wind.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
Ataturk is about as good as a capitalist can be. One of history's great revolutionary heroes. I mean, at one point he invited 60% of the parliament he created to be "his" party thereby creating an opposition party. He was pretty badass.

The current government? Well, let's just say Ataturk built in a solution to governments like this one.

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

Shbobdb posted:

The current government? Well, let's just say Ataturk built in a solution to governments like this one.

The military might not putsch this time you know~

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
The time for a putsch has passed it isn't happening this time.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
I will throw in my two bits and say there is a reason Erdogan is still in power: it is the social divides those coups which divided and embittered half the country to no end, and the silent cultural war that has been happening since the 1920s. In addition, the demographics of the country are more complicated than many assume, many people who live in urban areas also vote AKP and the number is probably still growing. The traditional rural/urban divide has blurred a considerable amount in the last few decades.

Obviously around here, Erdogan is a tinpot leader than needs to be overthrown without consequence. I think that impulse I think it really speaks of the near complete ignorance of how fragile the body politic of Turkey is and has been for a while.

He is obviously corrupt and promotes are particularly noxious form of politics, but the polls don't lie and there are strong reasons why most Turks don't vote for the CHP. There is no easy exit for Turkey.

Ardennes fucked around with this message at 19:17 on Apr 12, 2015

fspades
Jun 3, 2013

by R. Guyovich
"Erdogan is winning elections from his rural base in the east of the country" is one of those notions that gets thrown around a lot in non-Turkish environments, and it's funny because it's completely false. You can check this easily by noting Turkey is 72% urbanized. Rural voters don't count as much and it's not like they uniformly vote Erdogan anyway. Rural-based ethnic/religious minorities form some of the most consistent front of opposition against the AKP and these are especially concentrated in the east. Rather, you'd want to look at small Anatolian cities, as well as sections of (Sunni Turkish) urban poor in metropolitan areas.

tsa
Feb 3, 2014
It's probably shorthand for saying there is a very strong regional divide sorta like the US talks about the north and south, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_presidential_election,_2014

I'm not familiar at all with what districts are what, but it might be the case that the districts that go to the opposition are more urban than the districts that go to Erdogan? I can see that as being translated to his victory being because of a rural base, but of course nowadays you need urban voters to win since Turkey uses popular vote, not an electoral college (right?). With an US style system it would still be possible for some gerrymandering-esque nonsense to happen but if with a popular vote the only reason a candidate would win without urban support is if there was massive vote differentials in urban vs rural communities which is pretty unlikely.

A Fancy 400 lbs
Jul 24, 2008
I like how Erdogan says you can't attack the president in the media in other countries. I'd love to see how he'd react if something like Breitbart popped up in Turkey.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Hitlers Gay Secret posted:

Turkey is the only country with a ban on burning their flag. Plus they can jail you for talking poo poo about their retarded founder Aatrek I mean Ataturk.

EDIT: In a free country I can say stuff like my founding fathers thought black people were inferior and not worthy of citizenship, and not get in trouble.

Ataturk was born in Greece to a part-Albanian family, FYI

*is arrested as Turkish police abseil through my window*

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

fspades posted:

"Erdogan is winning elections from his rural base in the east of the country" is one of those notions that gets thrown around a lot in non-Turkish environments, and it's funny because it's completely false. You can check this easily by noting Turkey is 72% urbanized. Rural voters don't count as much and it's not like they uniformly vote Erdogan anyway. Rural-based ethnic/religious minorities form some of the most consistent front of opposition against the AKP and these are especially concentrated in the east. Rather, you'd want to look at small Anatolian cities, as well as sections of (Sunni Turkish) urban poor in metropolitan areas.

Even Istanbul and Ankara have consider numbers of AKP voters, a majority if you count suburbs outside the centers of the cities. It may be true that most of central Istanbul probably hates Erdogan's guts but if you start going to the suburbs (which isn't hard since they are freaking massive) you are going to see very different opinions.

Also, as you say, Turkey's rural population isn't homogeneous and the HDP is going to have its Kurdish strongholds and the MHP is still out there. Together, it just isn't enough to really challenge the AKP.

At its heart I think it speaks of much of the mis-communication about the rise of religiosity of the middle east, which is both cultural but also class based, and in many ways is a rejection of politics that dominated the country. AKP obviously isn't leftist quite the opposite, but it is an outlet of a lot of pent up resentment that has built up over generations. Even if the Turkish military could hold a coup, they wouldn't be able to control the country afterwards.

Ultimately, Ataturk's system of just keeping a lid of both Kurdish nationalism and religiosity through the military force just couldn't be sustained.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
I've been hearing some crazy conspiracy theories about the current administration and ISIS. I'm assuming that's just crazy slander.

Otherwise, I've just heard the patronage argument which seems debunked :( is it more analogous to the rise of the religious right in America, which is a very suburban phenomenon?

Whorelord
May 1, 2013

Jump into the well...

Sounds like Turks need to respect the robot tbh

Frogfingers
Oct 10, 2012

Shbobdb posted:

I've been hearing some crazy conspiracy theories about the current administration and ISIS. I'm assuming that's just crazy slander.

Otherwise, I've just heard the patronage argument which seems debunked :( is it more analogous to the rise of the religious right in America, which is a very suburban phenomenon?

Not really. They just have no sympathies with any players in the conflict. They are perfectly fine with Syria falling apart if it means Assad, Daesh, Kurds, etc. bleed themselves dry. Less manpower for them to pick battles with Turkey. Undemocratic as Turkey is becoming, it's as stable as it's ever been and can play the long game if it wants to now.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Frogfingers posted:

Not really. They just have no sympathies with any players in the conflict. They are perfectly fine with Syria falling apart if it means Assad, Daesh, Kurds, etc. bleed themselves dry. Less manpower for them to pick battles with Turkey. Undemocratic as Turkey is becoming, it's as stable as it's ever been and can play the long game if it wants to now.

Also to be honest Turkey probably hasn't ever really a functioning democracy in the first place, the last "soft coup" happened in 1997.

fspades
Jun 3, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Shbobdb posted:


Otherwise, I've just heard the patronage argument which seems debunked :( is it more analogous to the rise of the religious right in America, which is a very suburban phenomenon?

Nope. When they first came into power AKP was a phenomenon that was supported both by some sections of the working class and elite interests, whereas in America there is a much sharper distinction in voting patterns when it comes to class. AKP exclusively plays a game of identity politics and unfortunately they are very good at it. One of the telling signs of this is that you can reasonably determine someone's voting preference just by asking if they are doing their daily prayers or not. Those who think of themselves as "proper muslims" are also more likely to vote for the party they see as "proper muslims." Simple as that.

But despite this it would be hard to claim that AKP is an Islamist party in the vein of Muslim Brotherhood. There are Islamist elements within it but they got weaker, not stronger. Especially in recent years, Erdogan's cult of personality has grown to utterly ridiculous levels and now even within the AKP what really matters is unquestionably obeying him. In fact, AKP's Islamist old guard is getting increasingly more agitated over this development. Here's an interesting article about it.

fspades fucked around with this message at 05:04 on Apr 14, 2015

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy
I'm wondering but if Erdogen health were to fail him in the next few years, what would happen to AKP? Would it split?

Liberal_L33t
Apr 9, 2005

by WE B Boo-ourgeois

Crowsbeak posted:

I'm wondering but if Erdogen health were to fail him in the next few years, what would happen to AKP? Would it split?

It's times like this that I wish the CIA had a better track record of arranging for foreign leaders' :airquote: health to fail :airquote:. :unsmigghh:

In all seriousness though, Erdogen/Erdogan/Evil Forehead Man having a sudden fatal or debilitating stroke would make me seriously consider that maybe, just maybe, there is an Allah~

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Crowsbeak posted:

I'm wondering but if Erdogen health were to fail him in the next few years, what would happen to AKP? Would it split?

Depends how far into the "next few years" and how telegraphed his demise has been. Problem with cults of personality isn't necessarily that they're bad for the disenfranchised population at the time, is that they eliminate all mechanisms to peacefully transition power through a sustainable and legitimate process.

Liberal_L33t posted:

It's times like this that I wish the CIA had a better track record of arranging for foreign leaders' :airquote: health to fail :airquote:. :unsmigghh:

In all seriousness though, Erdogen/Erdogan/Evil Forehead Man having a sudden fatal or debilitating stroke would make me seriously consider that maybe, just maybe, there is an Allah~

Look, our institutions like to work with locals to advance our interests. If someone we trust, in the position of capacity and ability, came to us for procurement of some items to assist, we might be able to avoid asking further questions and fulfill their request for provisions.

Erdogan ain't stupid, he knows this as well as we do. Hence why his system is a ticking time-bomb: soon as growth stalls out and maintaining his governing majority faces unanticipated barriers, he'll take the easy option and bury those barriers.

My Imaginary GF fucked around with this message at 22:02 on Apr 15, 2015

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

My Imaginary GF posted:

Look, our institutions like to work with locals to advance our interests. If someone we trust, in the position of capacity and ability, came to us for procurement of some items to assist, we might be able to avoid asking further questions and fulfill their request for provisions.

  • Locked thread