Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Black88GTA
Oct 8, 2009

NihilismNow posted:

The i3 could be way more succesful if it had a non retarded range extender. 7 liters of fuel and you need to fully recharge the battery before you can fuel up again when it is gone.
If it had a normal fuel tank (like 35 liters) and you could refuel it without recharging it would sell like hotcakes here because due to taxes it is pretty cheap.
People who buy cars for tax reasons do not care about looks.

Maybe I'm just dumb / not reading this right or something, but what possible reason could there be for them to gimp it like this? :psyduck: I mean, I can see the reason for the low fuel capacity (packaging, and the potential for the fuel to sit in the tank for a while without being used up) but why effectively hard limit the range like that?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread