|
have simple things done on modern computers been measured in plank time? plank is the smallest unit of time apparently i'm most interested in how many planks it takes for today's computers to evaluate a bool. on the OS X side of things, i've heard this is a single instruction
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 21:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 11:33 |
|
|
stop posting op
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 21:32
|
|
|
sorry, it's actually spelled "planck"
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
i hope this thread gets gassed in exactly 1 tP
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 23:42
|
|
|
is plank time whenever you're posting OP
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
GoldenTeeth posted:is plank time whenever you're posting OP no i barely post
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
pram posted:stop posting op wish you would walk off a plank
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
stop posting op
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
pram posted:stop posting op ** erects middle dick. gives you the middle the dick **
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Planck time isn't like the shortest possible time it's like the shortest measurable time or the time shortest which we can be certain of something etc. same with Planck length (your dick) or Planck mass (your balls)
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 05:32
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:Planck time isn't like the shortest possible time it's like the shortest measurable time or the time shortest which we can be certain of something etc. same with Planck length (your dick) or Planck mass (your balls) yea p much.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 07:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 07:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 08:40
|
|
|
remember that planking fad? ha ha ha!
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 14:04
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:Planck time isn't like the shortest possible time it's like the shortest measurable time or the time shortest which we can be certain of something etc. same with Planck length (your dick) or Planck mass (your balls) well how many plancks does it take for a 2015 macbook pro to figure out if a bool is set to YES or NO?
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 14:16
|
|
|
if you have to ask youll never know
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 14:24
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:if you have to ask youll never know why i guess i could just convert the nano seconds it takes into planks if i figure that out
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 14:35
|
|
|
lol one nanosecond is 1.855094832e+34 plancks. drat computers are slow
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 14:37
|
|
|
whaaaaaaa
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 14:39
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:Planck time isn't like the shortest possible time it's like the shortest measurable time or the time shortest which we can be certain of something etc. same with Planck length (your dick) or Planck mass (your balls) scientists have identified the dick molecule
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 16:10
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:scientists have identified the dick molecule chemical structure 8=====D
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
how do you measure things that are so massively faster than anything that can measure them that it's it's like trying to measure an atom with a yardstick?
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 18:56
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:remember that planking fad? ha ha ha! when science tried to measure how long u last in bed!
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
EMILY BLUNTS posted:how do you measure things that are so massively faster than anything that can measure them that it's it's like trying to measure an atom with a yardstick? planck time is simply the value of t when you do calculations with c = 1
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 19:35
|
|
|
EMILY BLUNTS posted:how do you measure things that are so massively faster than anything that can measure them that it's it's like trying to measure an atom with a yardstick? you can't as of yet, and i don't know we'll ever be able to. it's just a made up number based on some poo poo. according to wikipedia in the article about planck time "As of May 2010, the smallest time interval uncertainty in direct measurements is on the order of 12 attoseconds (1.2 × 10−17 seconds), about 3.7 × 1026 Planck times."
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
 Mods will brutally destroy the fucktarded OP. I believe it in my heart.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 20:49
|
|
|
I've been away for some time what's so wrong with the op seems like a perfectly interesting (if a bit simple) question
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
op is deranged, sick, bad etc
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
pram posted:op is deranged, sick, bad etc don't sign
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 23:06
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:don't sign ahahahahaal lool classic captain foo
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
pram posted:ahahahahaal lool classic captain foo ikr
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 23:12
|
|
|
classic to and fro
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
now that's what i call YOSPOS
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 23:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 11:33 |
|
|
dat sum yospos? good poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 00:08
|
|
