Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


So I'm out of town at the moment and don't really know my PC's specs off the top of my head, but I was able to run Witcher 2 on it with no issues. Even with the downgrade is Witcher 3 going to be so much more intensive than 2 that my machine bursts into flames? I'd rather not have to go out and get a new console just for this, but it's one of the few games that would motivate me.

(Sorry to interrupt the arguing)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Utnayan posted:

What is your spec? Given the new evidence I would hardly think that recommended specs would be a GTX 770 and an i5 unless you had 9 pop ups of live porn going at the same time.

With the new info, you will be fine with a 570/670 and 4 gb Ram and set it to high settings.

I'll be honest, my brother kind of set it up for me when I wanted to get more into modding some of my games so I don't know a whole lot about specifics. Like I said though it ran Witcher 2 and pretty much every other recent game just fine on high settings so I was wondering if this is such a drastic change that it can't handle it. But I realize that's kind of vague so if that's impossible to really say, it's fine. I'm not going to be in line on release day or anything.

I'm mostly hoping I can run it so I can wait on the consoles a little longer and not have to drop $450-something or other on this. :v:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Mr E posted:

Hot drat, Utnayan has about a ninth of this thread's posts. That's impressive. Game's gon be good.

I appreciate his answer to my question, but he even managed to incorporate a dig at the downgrade in it too. That's pretty impressive. :tipshat:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Roshnak posted:

So I watched the first couple minutes of that video and it turns out they were talking about a toning down sharpen filter on the grass.

Here you go Utnayan, I fixed it for you:



I got a little overzealous and sharpened Geralt and a deer and everything else, but I didn't want to downgrade it so I left it as is.

Needs more artifacts to give it that old-timey gritty medieval feel.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Samurai Sanders posted:

I did Roche first and though after doing the other path I can see that's the "good" one, but Roche was definitely more fun and I'll be using that as the basis for 3.

Roche is definitely kind of a dick, but holy poo poo I would take his side over trying to navigate Vergen or do that stealth mission. But on the other hand Iorveth's path had the funniest sex opportunities so what can you do?

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Lord Lambeth posted:

I dunno I enjoyed Ioverth's path a lot more. Roche's path felt a heck of a lot more cynical and I found myself hating the people I had to work with a lot of the time. Whereas Ioverth side had Saskia, who's just so darn idealistic. Also Ioverth's path has the Sackful of Fluff quest.

Both paths have the Sackful of Fluff quest, it's just with Roche you can only do it at a particular point in the storyline when you cross the mist. And with Roche you have that weird spot by the Visionary's hut where harpies just infinitely respawn every few minutes for easy feather gathering.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


I said come in! posted:

This is about ethics in video game graphics. #witcher3gate

Really, won't someone ever think of the poor PC gamers? You can't look down on console babbies if they're all the same graphically. :qq:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Utnayan posted:

Those poor PC gamers as they feed you with money yet cannot have a say in honest marketing of a product.

What heathens.

This may sicken you but I played Witcher 2 on console and PC, but didn't notice much difference other than the lack of meditation transitions and Xbox 360 Flotsam didn't have any stray dogs.

Edit: And the PC version autosaved so much it eventually wouldn't function until I deleted most of the saves (manually since it would crash in the game menus).

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Utnayan posted:

Witcher 2 on PC and 360 were very different.

Maybe this will help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5giXgNCh3z8

OK, but I'm saying that I didn't notice because I didn't have them playing side by side like that video and I don't give a poo poo about fairly minor differences in quality. So I guess what I'm saying is I'm destroying the industry. :madmax:


I'm sorry, I didn't mean to be a nitpicky tool there. And to be fair with Roche's path you have basically no reason to go anywhere near the questgiver's house, I just tend to explore a lot.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Ice Fist posted:

hahahahaha best post on the whole thread. We can all go home now until the game releases. Shut it down Orv

Oh my god how did I miss this?



A WHIRLWIND OF RAGE AND STEEL

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


gnarlyhotep posted:

Literally laughing my loving rear end off

I think the funniest part for me is that "stairs" isn't really a thing that has any meaning for most people on SA anymore, rather than the sick burn he thought it was.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


GatewayOfLastResort posted:

Hey guys who's looking forward to cutting some monsters the gently caress up? I know I am. (Also Geralt's dulcet tones, I love that voice actor.)

Same for both. I'm also looking forward to hours and hours of a third-person view of Geralt. :mrgw:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


RatHat posted:

How short is Chapter 3 of the Witcher 2? The city seems quite small compared to the previous chapters and there don't seem to be many side-quests either. Though this isn't a bad thing as I wanted to complete it by Tuesday.

Also geez the game really just throws the best armor and weapons at you in this chapter huh.

It's pretty short unless you're intent on doing all the different possible paths, which could add up. There's also a neat optional quest that lets you respec if that's something you want to do.

Symetrique posted:

So are CDPR shills more vulnerable to silver or steel swords?

Whatever metal Polish coins are made of or maybe a sword made of sliced up credit cards.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Drifter posted:

Maybe they deliberately put out a buggy game in order to encourage people to buy it and register their purchase so they could download the patches.

The downloads are all full of spyware so CDPR can monitor their players and find out which ones know the TRUTH. :tinfoil:

Seriously though as long as I get to kill monsters and make lots of dubious decisions I'm happy :) (give me my money Comte).

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


AbstractNapper posted:

The last scene overlooking the mountain looks awesome on *Max* settings.
To be fair, if what the video shows as "min" is what you get when you put every setting to low or disabled, then that's amazing.

Honestly the minimum settings look like some fairly recent games on max (unmodded Skyrim :argh: ).

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Yaos posted:

I would not say 3 and a half years is recent.

OK, good to know.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


red19fire posted:

I'm stoked for this game, but I've never played the series. Is there anything I need to know going in, or is it better to go in blind? I'm going on console, too, will there be a way to manipulate the previous story or save files? Like the Keep online in dragon age inquisition?

If it helps at all, I went into Witcher 2 completely blind world/storyline-wise and it was no problem at all. I would imagine 3 won't be too much worse, especially considering this game is introducing plenty of people and places that weren't really in the previous games much (other than mentions in dialogue and stuff).

I really really hope they do the other playable characters thing better this time though.

RatHat posted:

I hope armor doesn't apply to traps in the Witcher 3. It was really weird in Witcher 2 since stuff like bear traps become completely harmless like halfway through chapter 1.

Just purposely running into bear traps became my method for collecting them, instead of meticulously disarming them first. :haw:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Demiurge4 posted:

Man Quen is such a loving crutch and everyone abuses the gently caress out of it. Quit using Quen you cowards! :argh:

On the other hand it was always really fun to upgrade the hell out of it and just watch the battlefield explode with electricity the second anything touched you. But I still rarely used it because I was too busy spamming Igni all day everyday.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Broose posted:

Wonder if this game is going to have the same problem as other open world games where you might get a new weapon as a reward, but that sidequest/event that was between the quest giver and objective gave you stuff that completely outclasses it in all ways.

Is that really a big problem to worry about though? It's usually a minor annoyance at worst.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


hopterque posted:

How dare you, dice poker was great.


Now let me just throw these dice across the room accidentally.

It's pretty great if you love save scumming, gingerly touching the analog stick and still losing all your money. :v: To this day I still don't understand what makes the difference when I win or lose (granted I don't play regular poker either).

I hated the arm wrestling more, just because it was such a pain to do on a controller. I'm surprised I didn't snap the sticks right off the thing during some of those matches.

Slate Action posted:

Yeah, in an RPG when I get a quest reward that's inferior to what I have or that I can't use, I just think 'cool, some extra cash.' It's only a problem when the quests are boring and you lose all motivation to do them. That doesn't sound like it's the case here.

This was always great since I never wanted to sell off monster parts until chapter 3 and by extension was constantly dirt poor.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


In addition to the bridge scene there's also the one where just busts through the wall of the elven baths like the Kool-Aid Man. :v:

Psiharis posted:

Comparatively, but he never gelled for me personally. I played the game an embarrassing number of times (multiple paths on PC, at least 4-5 runs on 360) and still dislike the sneering gently caress. He has a right to be that way, no question, but I still don't enjoy his company. Plus I really didn't like the later lovesick puppy aspects and found Saskia completely bland. She has a grand vision and that's all we get until the Big Reveal - admirable, yes. Likable? Mehhh. Maybe it's supposed to be endearing that an ancient badass like Iorveth can still be naive and trusting to fall for some rando who makes pretty speeches, but it made me embarrassed for him more than anything.

Not saying people who like Iorveth are wrong. Just that his attitude never stopped grating on me personally and in some ways got worse, while for all his own flaws, I liked Roche more with every interaction.

I think a big part of it is that Roche is there with you pretty much every step of the way like the game is some kind of buddy movie. Iorveth tends to sort of drift in and out, just showing up occasionally to help with the big stuff (looking like he smelled something really bad the whole time). And half the time when he talks to you it's in a super condescending tone, which is understandable I guess but it's not endearing. Saskia just comes off like a naive idiot to me.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Lycus posted:

That scene is stupid either way, and should've been cut.

But it's so much fun playing as other characters (with only like 2 lovely basic sword attacks). :downs:

As for plough, like the other person mentioned it's not exactly a euphemism limited to the Witcher. I'd imagine they use it both to give the dialogue some colloquial flavor and so every single character/NPC isn't saying "gently caress" every 5 seconds. They say it constantly and just imagining every instance of plough being replaced with gently caress would sound kind ridiculous and over the top even by Witcher standards. Also takes some of the impact away when it's used as a curse.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


megalodong posted:

Are there any non-retarded streamers for this? Every one I look at has a giant facecam, and some huge fuckoff banner pop up every time someone subs, covering up half the game.

Yep that's a streamer. Just be glad they don't have some loud obnoxious sound effect that plays every time someone donates money (do they? :ohdear: ).

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


I know the previous person was joking, but somehow it wouldn't surprise me if it was some weird Xbone defense against people breaking release dates.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


bloodsacrifice posted:

that could work if its priced right, like ten bucks a month would be worth it if there was at least 2 games you wanted to play coming out. The biggest (imo fatal) obstacle would probably getting all the different studios and publishing companies on board because you'd be limiting the hell out of your market, which currently right now would be "everyone".

Sooo...Gamefly? :raise:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Drifter posted:

gently caress, I just realized back when I picked Iorveth's side I didn't kill Loredo and opted instead to rescue to people trapped in the burning building. gently caress. That won't end well for flotsam. :ohdear:

Maybe I'll just have to side with Roche for my transfer game since I killed Loredo directly. Son of a bitch....but, maybe Flotsam is just a mistake Geralt will have to live with, and will haunt him as surely as any spirit from the Wild Hunt.

But dammit, all that cool political scheming and story information in Roche's path...drat.

I don't think it will matter much. The big thing with Loredo was that he sold Flotsam to Kaedwin. But with the current political climate I doubt that deal has stuck. Witcher 2 also didn't make it a secret that pretty much everyone in Flotsam hates him and is either working against him or hoping for the right moment to kick him out. Iorveth didn't seem to think he was going to be a problem anymore.

Besides, if you don't save the elf women you can't be big sleaze and sleep with one of them later. :v:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Drifter posted:

What happens if you Kill Loredo? is it the same thing?

I've never done it, but from what I can find it's similar to siding with Roche in that Flotsam stays part of Temeria and of course they no longer have such a scumbag leader. But Iorveth isn't exactly thrilled about the fact that you let a bunch of elves burn to death. And no elf sex in Vergen unless you like them crispy.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Really you shouldn't get your hopes too high for a town that's named after the word for "wreckage floating in water."

Here's a brief overview of choices/outcomes if you're curious about the road not taken.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


GreenBuckanneer posted:

Will this use witcher 2 save imports?

The PC version can. Otherwise there's apparently an option to simulate an import with a questionnaire or something like that.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


g-c posted:

OK, so... The Witcher 3 unlocked early for me and I'm about 3 minutes into the game before I decided to turn it off. I can't play a game in 2015 that looks like loving Morrowind. LMAO what a disaster.

Man you're not kidding, Geralt looks so weird now!



(Witcher 3 on Ultra Super Duper High Settings)

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Ice Fist posted:

Joke aside I miss this game and should probably do a playthrough of it sometime in the near futureish.

I love Elder Scrolls but I still have such a hard time getting into it because it really hasn't aged well (mechanics-wise anyway, plot and setting is still great).

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.



Really cool! Even caught a glimpse of the new eyeball-free Philippa.

Also (as always) don't read the comments because the same graphics downgrade loons are posting in full force there.

Kimmalah fucked around with this message at 22:52 on May 18, 2015

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


poptart_fairy posted:

So has there been anything definitive on the PS4 edition's framerate? Is it really that bad, or closer to Bloodborne where it's 30 fps except for when poo poo's on fire etc?

Bloodborne pretty regularly stutters in really weird ways so I'm not sure it's a great gold standard to use.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Broose posted:

Main thing to remember about it is that:

Harp shape = art/music
S Shape = animals
polygon with line in the middle = sky
the X with one side closed (Or hourglass shape with one side open) = Time

Activate the seals in the same order that those appear in the riddles in each room.

How did they not get it? The solution to each rune room is in the wiki page they linked, complete with pictures. :psyduck:

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Drifter posted:

Without using the loving cheat sheet, console plebe.

Then don't link the cheat sheet and generally act like a baby?

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Airfoil posted:

Narrated story updates when you load saves is a pretty cool idea.

Is it like a cutscene or just voiceovers? Darksiders 2 did a cutscene recap every time I'd load a save and I hated it.

Valliantstu posted:

Does anyone know where the simulate save NPC is?

I think it's something that just happens in the progress of the game's storyline if you don't import a file, you don't have to track him down.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


YANSEE posted:

What does that mean exactly? I said On, so i assume the game did a better job at filling me in to what happened at the end of Witcher 2?

As I understand it, choosing to simulate a Witcher 2 save means you'll eventually get a chance to answer questions that will simulate making choices in the previous game. Since on PS4 and Xbone there's no way for you to import an actual save file like you can on PC. If you don't do that I guess it will just default to whatever CDPR decided the canon outcomes of everything in Witcher 2 were.

Here's a video about the save import simulation if you're not worried about spoilers and all that.

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Harrow posted:

Is there a reason to import a real Witcher 2 save instead of simulating the choices you made? I'm not really in the mood to comb through all of my Witcher 2 saves to find which one I want to actually import unless there are some special items or something you get for doing so.

I think there are save files you can just download if you don't mind it not being strictly yours. As for why, I don't know for sure but I'd imagine there would be some minor stuff that might not get covered in your interview (like that sweet sweet tattoo).

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


Philthy posted:

Well, this sucks. It auto saved me at a fight with no health, so the game keeps reloading me into a battle where I die instantly.

My last manual saved game was about 3 hours back.

Not sure if I can do all this over again. This really really sucks. Might be done with the game at this point.

Protip: Manually save your game all the time.

Open World RPG Rule #1. Unfortunately you learned it the hard way, as we all have at some point.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kimmalah
Nov 14, 2005

Basically just a baby in a trenchcoat.


g-c posted:

Do you ever find out if the swallow potion helps Lena? It's said that it could take a couple days and a couple days later no more info. I'm assuming it did?

Just looking around online, you do find out later from her lover in Velen that the potion saved her life but the toxins in it destroyed her mind. So basically about what I expect from a choice in this game.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply