|
RabidWeasel posted:I play probably 80%+ of my games in Persia or SEA so here's an excessively long effortlist of countries: Great write-up! Would it be possible to put this in the OP?
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2015 00:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 08:48 |
|
I'd like to see rival selection tweaked. You shouldn't lose one during a war if you can't select one at the same time. Either let us choose new ones during wartime, or don't let rivals drop during. Also, there needs to be a minimum time frame for someone to stay a rival. I swear I've had some switch between being valid/invalid once a month over the course of a year, and it drives me crazy to see the same country drop off the list then return almost immediately. Make it a 5 year minimum period after selection or something
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2015 14:21 |
|
PleasingFungus posted:Note that 40% liberty desire isn't too bad; it's only once they get over 50% that there's an actual risk of rebellion. I had Persia (playing as Ottomans) as a vassal with 550% liberty desire at one point. They didn't do anything except sit around not helping during wars.
|
# ¿ Oct 4, 2015 17:51 |
|
Kersch posted:Have you ever considered making attrition in deserts intense? Like 10%+ more attrition? But give countries that start in that type of terrain a national bonus that negates it. Maybe it can be negated by other nations later in game by tech, or a national idea. Maybe this, or alternately, give the Berbers a combat bonus in deserts/mountains. Like how the hordes get a bonus while fighting in the steppes. Alternatively, maybe there should be a penalty for fighting in a desert unless that's terrain your capital is in? It seems like if countries have attrition and supply problems while fighting in the most developed area in the world (Europe), they should have it a lot worse in deserts/hostile terrain.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2015 15:38 |
|
Rakthar posted:I would like to Formally Request that we let this CB expire, I never thought I would need to write this many words to try to say "Too much of a good thing can be bad, in some situations", but I would like to write no more words about it. Too late, a missionary has already been sent to raise your RR. Once you revolt, the mods will ban you.
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2015 21:31 |
|
When that happened to me one time, I spent ~100 years clicking "Placate local rulers".
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2015 03:57 |
|
Tahirovic posted:One thing they forgot to do is add a 5% Siege advisor. Speaking of which, I'd start taking Espionage if there was an idea that reduced the enemy's effective fort level. Just throwing that out there.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2015 14:58 |
|
DeeEmTee posted:Steppe hordes get a 25% bonus to shock damage on friendly (owned?) steppe provinces. So what you do is build as many infantry as they have total units in their front line and then fill as much of your combat width as you can with horsemen for flanking bonuses which lets you completely stomp most armies. It's completely worth it to go into debt to break a big nation because they will almost always go into more debt due to your units not costing anything to reinforce. Wouldn't that put your cavalry on the back row, or am I missing something?
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2015 15:20 |
|
Odobenidae posted:Khiva is a bunch of 1/1/1 provinces so it's not that much of a stretch.
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2016 15:24 |
|
TheFlyingLlama posted:the name needs to have something like matriarchal or matriarchy in it though Gloria ad Steinum
|
# ¿ Jan 27, 2016 22:40 |
|
Cast_No_Shadow posted:Does the vassal cut off for cheap cores still work? (Ala ottos release syria for cheap africa?) Yep
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2016 15:25 |
|
Where did these generals get their fire pips in the first place? How should it even be possible to have multiple fire pips in the mid 1400s? Hey Paradox, can we get an event chain that lets us find the place where these people are getting their ridiculously advanced knowledge from?
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2016 16:04 |
|
Kersch posted:You've been discovered fabricating jokes in the thread and have suffered a decrease in opinion of you Does that mean FYAD is the HRE?
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2016 20:16 |
|
Koramei posted:they did a livestream to show off some mare nostrum stuff: http://www.twitch.tv/paradoxinteractive/v/53143409 Can someone give us some highlights please?
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2016 22:00 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I still like monarchies more than republics. But gently caress republics really. Why?
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2016 23:00 |
|
Holy shitballs! Started a Poland-into-Prussia game because 1) new DLC, 2) never tried it before. I just finished coring the Teutons, culture-shifted into Prussian (at +1 stablity) when I got event that gave me +1 stability, used Papal Influence to get another +1, and burned 160 ADM to get back to positive territory. I was just thinking that now it was time to sit and wait until Austria recovered WE so I could call them into a war for Danzig with Pomerania + HRE Bohemia, when BAM! Personal Union with Austria!!! Only downside is that now I'm in a Succession War with England (who start with 3.4 WE from a brawl with France), but it should be easy enough to hold Vienna. If anyone wants the save file, I can upload it to Dropbox.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 20:28 |
|
Fat Samurai posted:When mothballing a fleet, sailors no longer needed are now returned to the country's sailor pool (up to max sailors). Now do this for disbanding army regiments & manpower, please.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2016 21:20 |
|
Odobenidae posted:If EU5 has some crazy pseudo-generated map that forms and deforms over time like geographers refining their techniques would draw I might keel over and die. I never knew how much I wanted that until you opened your big mouth.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 02:13 |
|
Tendronai posted:Full 1.18 patchnotes are up, https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?threads/patch-1-18-full-patchnotes.973237/ Paradox posted:Heir Chance modifier no longer affects the life expectancy of your Heir. What? So, until now, the higher your heir chance, the longer they'll live?
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2016 16:01 |
|
Make it dependent on number of coastal provinces, maybe. Increase the number up and/or reduce cost of going over in Naval ideas.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2016 21:39 |
|
For the Paradox devs, would you consider changing something? If a nation has subjects (Denmark, Austria, Poland, etc.), it's really annoying when their subjects constantly do those espionage actions to you all game long (i.e., sabotage recruitment, slander merchants, sow discontent). It's even more annoying when nations' colonies do the same. It's even worse when protectorates do it as well. In my last game, I don't think there was a single month where I didn't have all of those penalties in effect. It feels like it's just a constant negative modifier you can't do anything about. Maybe make it so that only the overlord could do those to other nations, while letting subjects just fabricate claims? Having said that, the 2146 hours I've spent in EU4 have been great, thanks!
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2017 16:42 |
|
Fintilgin posted:You used to be able to do it as anyone. It must have been in an old patch, as mentioned, pre-liberty desire too. I still remember my first game as the Ottomans, where I quit after the Crimean khanate got a PU over me when my starting ruler died a year into the game.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2017 16:05 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 08:48 |
|
Europa Universalis IV: The Kebab's in the Cradle and the Bahmani Pune
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2017 05:23 |