Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Ponsonby Britt
Mar 13, 2006
I think you mean, why is there silverware in the pancake drawer? Wassup?
So I'm generally someone who believes that deterrence isn't a very good justification for harsh punishments (for reasons that have already been discussed). And usually, when people argue that deterrence is a necessary element of our society, I argue that deterrence should be done with carrots instead of sticks. We shouldn't deter kids from becoming drug dealers by threatening them with punishment. We should deter them by giving them better education and access to better legal jobs, and make crime less attractive on the front end.

My question is, what does this look like in the context of espionage? If we get rid of the threat of harsh punishment for espionage, how else can we make "not spying" more attractive to potential spies? Or is that even possible? I'm caught between my hatred of our criminal justice system and my hatred of the Israeli government, but maybe there's a way to satisfy both those impulses?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread