|
gently caress. Jeb straight admits he's going to use the same FP advisors!
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 02:58 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 18:11 |
|
Trump: Mah brother!
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:06 |
|
No one wants to poison you, Carson, you ignorant gently caress!
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:09 |
|
Walker: Speaking as a member of the armed forces...go gently caress yourself!
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:14 |
|
spoon0042 posted:stop sounding so reasonable rand
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:15 |
|
WTF is Fiornia talking about?!?! Maintaining that sized military would bankrupt us even more.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:18 |
|
Joementum posted:Carly wants 300-350 ships in the US Navy. According to Wikipedia there are currently 417. (I'm guessing) she's talking about Destroyers+. Not like our PT boats or minesweepers and USNS ships.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:19 |
|
"SCOTUS don't know poo poo!" - Every candidate except Trump.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:22 |
|
Straight to Paul for
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:28 |
|
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:Dammit Rand stop being reasonable
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:29 |
|
Jeb! apparently didn't smoke enough.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:30 |
|
Holy poo poo, Rand....
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:31 |
|
God, I hate that loving "criminals will ignore the law" reasoning. Cause all those kids and young adults who shot up random places would've been able to do it just as easily if there were harsh anti-gun laws.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:39 |
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:America is not a planet
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:43 |
|
Truly, how Reagan-eske ARE they? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?????
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:51 |
|
Thatcher? Seriously you fucknut?
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:56 |
|
Carly:
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 03:59 |
|
Carson is getting more derpy by the second.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 04:05 |
|
Carly is a robot. I swear. I saw a spark shoot out of her ear.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 04:10 |
|
"I don't know what euphemisms are!" -Chris Christie
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 04:13 |
|
2 hours of CNN breakdown!!!
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 04:15 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 18:11 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:jesus she wants more nukes. Not really. "Strengthening the nuclear triad" doesn't necessarily mean increasing the number of nukes. Fake edit: Constant Hamprince posted:by the way, the 'nuclear triad' is a real thing (the three means of waging nuclear warfare: missiles, bombers and submarines) and needs reinforcement. not because they are weak offensively like carly means but because the standards of the divisions that operate them that there are regular terifying incidents of negligence involving warheads getting 'misplaced' by the college dropouts in charge of them Basically this. From my experience (and everything I've read), we have some safety issues we need to shore up concerning our handling of our nuclear arsenal. There have been a number of documented incidents over the last few decades which have come scarily close to ending in disaster. That having been said, I'm not one to give the benefit of the doubt.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2015 13:38 |