|
What can be done to encourage more apostasy in Muslim communities; particularly in the more conservative ones?
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2015 23:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 20:38 |
|
hobbez posted:Thank you so much for your response! Really interesting. Maybe Ill pick up No God But God. Ill let you know what I think! Reza Aslan is a consistent liar of the worst kind. Have fun with that. Vordulak posted:Well now this sounds interesting. Interesting how you have to do this with one religion.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2015 17:59 |
|
Panda Bear posted:can you demonstrate this for me? i've never seen him presented as such by anyone but fox news and the like so I'm genuinely curious. I'm phone posting right now but sure later tonight when I'm near a computer.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2015 19:42 |
|
Amun Khonsu posted:He didnt have sex with children. Read my post again. I explained it well enough. Holy poo poo, yes he did. The indulgence of historical revisionism among religious apologists is hilariously onerous these days, especially w/r/t to Islam.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 06:17 |
|
ashgromnies posted:Idk it sounds like it was at most one child, and her age is disputable. Unless you have some conclusive evidence you can share? Wow, at least you're open about condoning pedophilia.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 08:05 |
|
ashgromnies posted:lmao you're fuckin' dumb Why would I substantiate my claim when you already acknowledged it was true? It seems to me that you're attempting to censor yourself now.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 08:22 |
|
ashgromnies posted:what on earth are you talking about? i haven't acknowledged poo poo that you've said. try reading again. i said that the question of her age seems not settled -- she may or may not have been a "child", from what i can glean from this thread, and it may or may not have been acceptable practice at the time to marry "children" of such an age. that's hardly conclusive. It's widely accepted among anyone other than ideological driven apologists such as yourself that he engaged in pedophilia. He certainly had and promoted a heavily patriarchal worldview that oppressed women to begin with. I'm not even getting into the abhorrent massacres of apostates and nonbelievers. You could at least modify your tone into less of a casual and carefree one when discussing pedophilia, it isn't a laughing matter.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 08:33 |
|
The onus is on the apologist.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 08:42 |
|
ashgromnies posted:surprise, they've posted enough evidence in here that any reasonable person, based solely on the material in this thread, would come to the conclusion that knowing aisha's exact age is very difficult It doesn't have much merit because an ideological apologist for Muhammad isn't outright going to acknowledge or admit he engaged in pedophilia verbatim. Objectively it's an open question, which by definition means he shouldn't be held as a moral figure at least.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 08:48 |
|
Fuzz posted:Don't confuse modern Arab society with anything Muhammad was pushing, because it's become so hosed up and corrupt and it's not actually supported if you read the rules laid down in the Quran, let alone just look at the Prophet's own life, particularly with regard to his first wife. The barbaric & patriarchal passages in the Quran regarding women are abhorrent at the very least and it's intellectually dishonest to say that they would be the same if the "Prophet" who wrote them was a woman. The amount of double-talk among apologists about this is surreal. Amun Khonsu posted:I dont know how this thread got hijacked by individuals who feel the need to distort and circumvent the facts about the Prophet's marriage to Aisha. However, now that you feel good about yourselves, respect the OP and purpose of this thread and take it elsewhere please. Lets move on. Don't call something "fact" that you cannot prove. It also isn't unanimously agreed upon by historians. It's very evident that you're a reactionary ideologue when you come across opposition to your religion. Even if your beliefs about Aisha are correct, you're still regarding a mass murderer as a moral figure. It sounds like you intuitively know that Islam is nothing more than fiction yet you latch onto it due to an existential identity crises.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 18:52 |
|
Isn't interesting how historians and apologists differ on this issue? I wonder what the crux of it could be! We know your stupidity is only rivaled by your reading comprehension and you don't have to illustrate it to us any further.
|
# ¿ Dec 26, 2015 20:32 |
|
ashgromnies posted:He never will, he is a literal unironic Trump supporter and this is his schtick: making claims contrary to visible evidence and then never substantiating them. This is cute coming from the guy whining about GBS in QCS all the time. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 00:58 |
|
MrNemo posted:I'm sorry I didn't hear any references in that post from the guy who thinks it's super crucial to cite sources when making claims. Except I've never asked for a source because Muhammad's pedophilia and genocidal actions are well known among a significant segment of historians with no ideological agenda.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 07:05 |
|
Nude Bog Lurker posted:It's well known among a significant segment of SA posters without no ideological agenda that your gimmick is tedious and comprehensively played out. gently caress off. I don't think I've seen anyone in this thread with a dissenting opinion towards Islam treated without outright hostility.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 07:15 |
|
Lassitude posted:Muslims believe that everyone is by default born Muslim. They believe Islam is by default the religion of the human race, and anything else is a deviation from the correct path. So if you're born to Muslim parents, you are invariably Muslim yourself. And if you choose to reject that, you are put to death for apostasy (in nations where shari'a is enforced). Muslim children do not get to choose. Islam is the only Abrahamic religion which allows and condones polygamy in addition to this. It's shameful how Turkey (a NATO member) is gradually succumbing to islamism under Erdogan; where customs such as these become the norm.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 10:03 |
|
Amun Khonsu posted:Islam forbids polygamy. Amun Khonsu posted:It tolerates polygyny but discourages it by placing limitations. This is the sort of insufferable double-talk among religious apologists that I mentioned earlier. Please tell me that you find polygyny reprehensible.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 10:12 |
|
Amun Khonsu posted:Ask me a question about Islam and I will answer it. Ask me about myself in PM. Otherwise gtfo. This is not a debate thread. Its an "Ask us" thread. I'm asking whether you believe polygyny is repugnant or not. E: Whats with these ninja edits you keep doing, I can't keep up.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 10:17 |
|
Did you buy me this av?
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 10:45 |
|
Amun Khonsu posted:I apologize to those who have been reading this thread in dismay over the negative crap being posted in it. I have devoted my spare time to answering questions based on my knowledge and experiences. Im not going to continue to engage the diatribe, vitriol and hate-mongering from clowns as I have better things I can be doing. I have no problem with pedophilia apologists & and polygyny enthusiasts putting me on ignore.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 18:30 |
|
Fuzz posted:Yeah, I'm tuning out after the ignore drama. If someone has a question for a pretty moderate (I hate that term) American Muslim, PM me to check here and post. Amun Khonsu seems like a closet radical TBQH.
|
# ¿ Dec 28, 2015 05:36 |
|
Jastiger posted:What did you convert from? How are you more predisposed to believe than others? Are you saying you're just a gullible person? To argue rationally with Amun Khonsu is like trying to jerk off with sandpaper.
|
# ¿ Dec 28, 2015 19:49 |
|
Amun Khonsu posted:I would not say gullible, but normal. I think it is scientifically accepted that the brain of our species is wired to believe in God and polls show that most people do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism Couple this with the fact that if I was gullible, I would have taken the Church's word for it and not wasted 4 years in intensive personal study of religion to resolve my questions. A religion founded on war and plunder is not "progressive" nor illustrates "social justice" in any way shape or form. Muhammad's views on women, homosexuals, and nonbelievers in the Koran attests to this. If your religion motivates you to get out of bed in the morning to pursue meaning & happiness, then I'm all for it. However, don't just blatantly make poo poo up or indulge in historical revisionism.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 01:53 |
|
Amun Khonsu posted:EX: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism#Europe Atheism is spreading throughout the Arab world, specifically due to the internet: https://newrepublic.com/article/121559/rise-arab-atheists We still have a long way to go, but little progress is better than none.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 04:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 20:38 |
|
Flagrant Abuse posted:I'm an atheist but this thread is making me want to convert to something just to spite the pushy, evangelical atheists who are just as irritating as the people they hate. Try Buddhism. They're essentially atheists who like to meditate.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 06:40 |