|
935 posted:Has anybody's computer been infested with malware after visiting Rubio's official website? I get little pop up ads for Rubio now randomly. I'm not the only one apparently. https://m.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/3noi7r/infected_with_malware_after_visiting_a_marco/ Jesus even the young'uns don't know how to take a screen shot right
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 10:44 |
|
|
etalian posted:His own party hates him and he doesn't tap in the GOP inner Id effectively like the other candidates. Tapping the inner id hasn't worked because most of the Republican Party primary voters aren't that extreme. There have been noisy, "scary" republican candidates that got plenty of media coverage in the past two election cycles. They scare people on the left but don't win in the primaries. i wonder if we would see faithless electors in the general election if trump was running independently and doing well
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 06:23
|
|
|
TheScott2K posted:Jesus even the young'uns don't know how to take a screen shot right Well its a mac so that kid is already a lost cause.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 12:03
|
|
|
"Rubs"
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
Like out of a toilet?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 23:17
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:Like out of a toilet? like a loving animal
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2015 07:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 06:38
|
|
|
I have no clue what that straw says, Lygm?
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 07:48
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:I have no clue what that straw says, Lygm? FYGM=gently caress You, Got Mine
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 08:00
|
|
|
This isn't a bad political cartoon. The labeling makes sense and wasn't just added as an afterthought.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
Someone should make a mashup of Marco Rubio and Dark Yugi and title it Ru-Bi-O.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:This isn't a bad political cartoon. The labeling makes sense and wasn't just added as an afterthought. actually you can remove the labels except fygm and it would be better. Matthewtheman posted:Someone should make a mashup of Marco Rubio and Dark Yugi and title it Ru-Bi-O. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 21:00
|
|
|
Marco if you become president you will have to shut down SA because I am radicalized as gently caress. Liberte Egalite Fraternite Ou La Mort. The New American Century must have a dawn of a thousand suns.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
Did somebody say *drinks water*?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 04:53
|
|
|
Ok, Bob...act natural, now...just grasp the...the cup...god, where do all the fingers go?! I've never thought about this...I'll just...as long as it gets to my mouth...
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2015 14:11
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvLpXIYLrec
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 12:01
|
|
|
Here thread, have 1,700 words about Rubio and water: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/marco-rubio-love-water-216441 quote:The 44-year-old senator takes care to ensure the availability of water at his public events and can be particular about how he takes it. His advance team has mandated exact requirements for the vessels he will drink out of: stemless glasses — not stemmed ones or water bottles.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 17:01
|
|
|
Would Rubio request the water that flows down Denali as President?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 23:32
|
|
|
marco rubio known to piss in own mouth when no other source of water available this is what the jeb campaign is waiting to drop
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 23:59
|
|
|
That picture makes me parched.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
didn't think any more of the water thing than that it was a stupid flub in that one speech, but after reading that article, holy poo poo the man has a legit problem
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
so is marco rubio the reason california's in a drought
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 06:42
|
|
|
Reminder that the last FL gubernatorial debate was delayed because Rick Scott was protesting that Charlie Crist had a small electric fan directed at his crotch. Florida, y'all.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
rabble rabble posted:didn't think any more of the water thing than that it was a stupid flub in that one speech, but after reading that article, holy poo poo the man has a legit problem Rubio can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 16:33
|
|
|
skaboomizzy posted:Reminder that the last FL gubernatorial debate was delayed because Rick Scott was protesting that Charlie Crist had a small electric fan directed at his crotch. I think a lot about this election can be explained by the two strongest establishment candidates being incompetent weirdos from Florida
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
point of return posted:so is marco rubio the reason california's in a drought He actually made this joke when he visited California for a fundraising event. Also for some reason the WIU straw election had him winning the nomination.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 18:34
|
|
|
Rubio would win a Wii U the toddler.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
No idea who this pollster is, but they have Rubio in first in New Hampshire among "very likely" voters. http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/2016_PRES_NH_GOP_2.pdf
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
I'd love to see the difference in methodology between their likely and super duper totes likely screen. Personally I'm thinking voter screens are going to be pretty off on the GOP side this election, much like it was for dems in 2008 and for similar reasons. You have candidates that are going to drive voters to the polls who probably weren't' there in 2008 and 12. Much like Obama 08 I'd put money on Trump in particular outperforming LV screens.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
Planarch posted:No idea who this pollster is, but they have Rubio in first in New Hampshire among "very likely" voters. I just heard CNN say that Rubio needs to look out for Christie since they're 2nd/3rd in polls behind Trump. I didn't know Christie was a serious candidate.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 07:09
|
|
|
The Aardvark posted:I just heard CNN say that Rubio needs to look out for Christie since they're 2nd/3rd in polls behind Trump. I didn't know Christie was a serious candidate. Define serious. Christie was probably the 'next in line' after 2012, but Bridgegate hosed that up for him - that and Trump usurping his loudmouth, say whatever persona. He is absolutely in this to win it (or a cabinet position, AG looks nice). He has no desire to enter congress, so for him it's pretty much POTUS or retirement.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 07:27
|
|
|
There have been too many insane/illegal/out of touch/incredibly stupid things said by Republican candidates this election for me to keep up with. Aside from his terrible views on abortion, Rubio seems like the least insane/stupid/generally terrible human being Republican candidate. Is there something I'm missing? I want to know who the lesser evil is so I can root for them, because hoping Trump wins the nomination 'because he certainly couldn't win a general election!' seems like something that will only end in tears.
Nix Panicus has issued a correction as of 11:06 on Dec 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 11:02
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:There have been too many insane/illegal/out of touch/incredibly stupid things said by Republican candidates this election for me to keep up with. Aside from his terrible views on abortion, Rubio seems like the least insane/stupid/generally terrible human being Republican candidate. Is there something I'm missing? I want to know who the lesser evil is so I can root for them, because hoping Trump wins the nomination 'because he certainly couldn't win a general election!' seems like something that will only end in tears. Rubio keeps talking about a New American Century and how terrorists hate us because we let women drive. He is a very explicit Forvever War candidate.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 13:24
|
|
|
Fun reading on the last "Project for a New American Century:" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 13:41
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Rubio keeps talking about a New American Century and how terrorists hate us because we let women drive. He is a very explicit Forvever War candidate. Isn't everyone but Rand Paul a Forever War candidate though? Has Rubio advocated for carpet bombing and assassination of family, or is his brand of warmongering more along the lines of 'we will never be free of this quagmire, so lets get troops back in there because its solved so much in the past'? And if it isn't Rubio, who is the lesser evil candidate? As a DINO who wishes Sanders had a real chance but will vote Hillary out of a sense of fear for the opposition, which Republican candidate will fill me with the least contempt for my fellow Americans if they win? I've gotten the impression so far that a Rubio/Fiorina ticket might do well enough in the general election to worry about, while being no more dumb and petty than other leaders this country has weathered before. Am I just completely wrong and woefully misinformed?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:which Republican candidate will fill me with the least contempt for my fellow Americans if they win? Rand Paul. Marco Rubio and everyone else on stage was calling for a stronger security state and more foreign excursions - Rubio and Jeb were the biggest 'Bush did nothing wrong' candidates.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 18:56
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Rand Paul. Marco Rubio and everyone else on stage was calling for a stronger security state and more foreign excursions - Rubio and Jeb were the biggest 'Bush did nothing wrong' candidates. Agreed 100%. Rand is the only one that doesn't want to bathe the rest of the world in nuclear fire. Of course, he wants to let store owners refuse to serve black people, so YMMV
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 21:42
|
|
|
Feral_Shofixti posted:Agreed 100%. Rand is the only one that doesn't want to bathe the rest of the world in nuclear fire. So my choices appear to be 'embraces literal armageddon' and 'libertarian who legitimately believes racism is cool and good if its the racist's choice'? Guys I was asking who the lesser evil is and these answers aren't very heartening. Honestly I still think I'd prefer Rubio to Paul, because at least the country has experience with military adventurist presidents and has some backbone for denying them, while I think many would fall all over themselves to embrace the social equivalent of state's rights. Also as an American I am fine with bombing the hell out of people I will never meet while it is upsetting to think about people I actually know being denied the right to buy pastries from an establishment of their choice.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:So my choices appear to be 'embraces literal armageddon' and 'libertarian who legitimately believes racism is cool and good if its the racist's choice'? Guys I was asking who the lesser evil is and these answers aren't very heartening. Honestly I still think I'd prefer Rubio to Paul, because at least the country has experience with military adventurist presidents and has some backbone for denying them, while I think many would fall all over themselves to embrace the social equivalent of state's rights. Also as an American I am fine with bombing the hell out of people I will never meet while it is upsetting to think about people I actually know being denied the right to buy pastries from an establishment of their choice. if you want safety of outcomes in the event of a GOP victory, consider that the GOP dominated congress might never unstick itself for a President Trump , and given likely midterm voters, he would be at least as immobilized as Obama. As a result, Trump may be the least of the evils, in all seriousness. There are people saying they'll bittervote for him, pretending to be swayed by his totally absent leftist healthcare ideas for the sake of getting people like zdr mad, but there are also people who think the GOP establishment's last act will be holding out until death to block anything from making it through congress because none of their guys won. Not that this would be a smart chance to take. I think the western world at least would be marginally safer with a clinton commander in chief. Sorry, developing world.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 22:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 10:44 |
|
|
stephenfry posted:if you want safety of outcomes in the event of a GOP victory, consider that the GOP dominated congress might never unstick itself for a President Trump , and given likely midterm voters, he would be at least as immobilized as Obama. As a result, Trump may be the least of the evils, in all seriousness. There are people saying they'll bittervote for him, pretending to be swayed by his totally absent leftist healthcare ideas for the sake of getting people like zdr mad, but there are also people who think the GOP establishment's last act will be holding out until death to block anything from making it through congress because none of their guys won. So you're telling me that I can root for Trump as both the schadenfreude option where I hate American politics and want to see the Republicans choke on their own poo poo and die, *and* as the responsible 'least harm' candidate because President Trump will be so hated by everyone he will never actually accomplish anything? This is like a dream come true. Just please assure me there aren't enough tea party asshat politicians out there who are secretly waiting for someone like Trump to come along so they can give voice to all their worst policies to actually implement anything Trump says and I can go back to hate watching the debates and not feeling a gnawing sense of terror that one of those men (sorry Fiorina, but I think we all know it's not happening) has a non-zero chance of being the next President of the United States.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 23:29
|
|