Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





System Metternich posted:



Ah, the joys of a simple Georgian/early Victorian English kitchen: Good conversations, good ale, the children are playing, the fire is roaring in the chimney and a small dog is running in a large wheel affixed to the wall. Wait, what?

Meet the “turnspit dog“ (canis vertigus or “dizzy dog“) or “vernepator cur“, a now extinct breed of dogs that nevertheless was a staple of large English kitchens throughout the early modern era. You've probably all seen or read the cliche image of a medieval scullion slowly turning a large piece of meat over an open fire as to prepare it for the feast. Well, this was dull and repetitive work and probably not very popular with whoever had to do it, so the 16th century (the dogs were first mentioned in 1576 as “turnespetes“, but they may well have been employed first at an even earlier date) saw an innovation that would revolutionise the kitchen: a dog, running in a wheel and thereby turning the meat - well, not automatically, but close enough. The wheels were put far away from the fire as for the dogs not to overheat, and they would also work in shifts - turning spits all day was exhausting, and so most every kitchen would keep at least two turnspits to relieve each other. Extant sources of the time even tell us that the dogs would know when their time was up and would leave their wheel as if on cue for the other one to take over. They also doubled as foot warmers, and there's the nice anecdote of the Bishop of Gloucester once giving a sermon in Bath and saying "It was then that Ezekiel saw the wheel...", when a couple of foot-warming turnspits among the audience would hear the last word and immediately run for the door, although I cannot say whether they wanted to jump into the wheel right away or tried to get the gently caress out of Dodge instead.

The usage of turnspit dogs wasn't limited to the UK, though; we know of several large kitchens in the US where they were employed as well. Benjamin Franklin's Philadelphia Gazette had advertisements for both dogs and wheels, and their bad treatment by NYC hotel owners in the 19th century was one of the main reasons for the formation of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

The advent of automated roast spit turners, so-called “clock jacks“ or “roasting jacks“ in the 19th century would eventually lead to the breed's disappearance. By 1750 they were ubiquitous, by 1850 only poor people still had them and by 1900 they were effectively extinct, although Queen Victoria would adopt unemployed turnspits as pets.



The short-legged breed died out that quickly because most people saw them as nothing more than tools, and many sources take note of how ugly they were and that they tended to have a “morose disposition“ as well. You can be the judge of that - above you can see “Whiskey“, the only taxidermied example of a turnspit dog in existence, displayed at the Abergavenny Museum in Wales. It's not the best example of taxidermy, either. Personally I think it looks cute.

I'm no expert in dogs, so I'll have to rely on the experts who tell me that the turnspit was either a kind of Glen of Imaal Terrier or Welsh Corgi, so it may well be that the closest living relatives of the lowly wheel-running dog now are the Queen's favourite pet.

As an aside to this very excellent and informative post, my grandfather is credited with saving the Glen of Imaal terrier from extinction in the 1950's. They are nice dogs :3:

Pookah has a new favorite as of 08:22 on Oct 18, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Powaqoatse posted:

Any of you know if this refers to a specific fairy tale or fable or something?

Looks like a knight with a tail riding a swan(?)

e: oh poo poo, he has hoofs too. Is he a faun or the devil?



I vaguely remember reading a nonsense folk tale that featured something like this - I did not find the story, but I did find an amazing repository of folk tales from around the world - catalogued by topic!

http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/folktexts.html



I love folk tales about terrible farts.

Edit: Apparently there is a Chinese legend about a Lord from the state of Qi who had to escape on a hen and there are pottery images of this on the roof of the Forbidden Palace.

Pookah has a new favorite as of 16:51 on Nov 3, 2017

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Or maybe just look it up? Jeanne Calment did apparently eat a lot of chocolate - up to 2 pounds a week, which is quite a lot of chocolate.

Not 2 pounds a day, which is vast amount of chocolate.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Alhazred posted:

A roman jeweler sold false jewels to the emperor Galienus' wife Salonina he sentenced the jeweler to be eaten by lions in the arena. The jeweler was forced into the arena where he heard the lions roaring and then the doors was opened.....and out came a tiny chicken. Galienus then proclaimed “He practiced deceit, and has had it practiced on him” and let the jeweler go.

Is it possible that Gallienus was also making a pun on his own name? - Gallus = cockerel in latin

That would be amazing.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





duckmaster posted:

https://archive.org/details/EDIS-SWDPC-01-04

Just a recording of a bugle call.

In 1890.

By a survivor of the Charge of the Light Brigade.

And the bugle was used at Waterloo, obviously.

Wonderful!

It's also interesting that the accents of the two people who speak sound perfectly modern to my ear, though the man at least must have grown up in the 1840's.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





System Metternich posted:

Au contraire, I just learned about the Ain Sakhri Lovers, an 11,000 years old sculpture found in what is today Palestine, that, depending on the viewer's perspective, looks either like a couple having sex, tits, a cock or a vulva which imo is not only really cool but also loving hilarious.

A photo of its front:


And here is a drawing of all possible appearances:


So it could be used as a visual tool for showing the basic elements of human sexuality?

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I was just flicking through one of those Taschen history of art book and came across a Renaissance painter unfamiliar to me, called 'Il Sodoma'

This was not his real name, as you might have guessed, just a nickname. The book helpfully told me this much, but failed to offer any explanation of why he was so called - was it intended as an insult? Was he (unlikely, I know) simply from a town called Sodoma?

So I went and looked him up, and it means exactly what you think it does, was probably originally intended as an insult, but one which he took and wore proudly and openly - he was a gay man who hung around with handsome men, and who also had a houseful of cool animals and birds that would come and play with you if you visited.

From Vasari:

quote:

In the beginning he executed many portraits from life with that glowing manner of coloring which he had brought from Lombardy, and he thus made many friendships in Siena, more because that people is very kindly disposed towards strangers [foreigners] than because he was a good painter; and, besides this, he was a gay and licentious man, keeping others entertained and amused with his manner of living, which was far from creditable. In which life, since he always had about him boys and beardless youths, whom he loved more than was decent, he acquired the by-name of Sodoma; and in this name, far from taking umbrage or offence, he used to glory, writing about it songs and verses in terza rima, and singing them to the lute with no little facility. He delighted, in addition, to have about the house many kinds of extraordinary animals; badgers, squirrels, apes, marmosets, dwarf asses, horses, barbs for running races, little horses from Elba, jays, dwarf fowls, Indian turtledoves, and other suchlike animals, as many as he could lay his hands on. But, besides all these beasts, he had a raven, which had learned from him to speak so well, that in some things it imitated exactly the voice of Giovanni Antonio, and particularly in answering to anyone who knocked at the door, doing this so excellently that it seemed like Giovanni Antonio himself, as all the people of Siena know very well. In like manner, the other animals were so tame that they always flocked round anybody in the house, playing the strangest pranks and the maddest tricks in the world, insomuch that the man's house looked like a real Noah's Ark.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





System Metternich posted:

Today I learned about the Marquis de Morès, a French aristocrat, cowboy, frontier ranchman, duelist, politician and arguably the world's first national socialist.

Marvellously detailed and interesting post - thank you. Sounds like he was an extremely stupid man who preferred to blame 'The Jews' for his endless cycle of failure than accept that he was just a massive dummy. It's a popular choice even nowadays.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Edgar Allen Ho posted:

One time one of my friends (who was born in Glasgow but she was brought to Ontario around maybe age 9, I think) showed me a video, drunk and out of context, of an also-drunk incoherent shouting white man and asked what language I thought he was speaking.

My answer, as someone who has studied enough russian to ask for a bathroom and not much else, was something like "um, not russian but slavic, maybe he's polish or czech?"

He was a scot and Glasgow native, screaming in scots/english/whatever

Obligatory Rab C. Nesbitt:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k7VoFiagfs

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I was looking up an old convent in Dublin today for completely unrelated reasons, and the research led me to records of claims made for damages following from the 1916 Rising. Two sisters (actual sisters, not necessarily nun-type sisters) who were living in the convent at the time put in a claim for nearly £600 in damages arising from the looting of 7 trunks, which seemed to me to be a huge sum. The archive has a full breakdown of all the items they said were looted in the violence that followed on from the Easter Rising.

The full entry is here:

http://centenaries.nationalarchives.ie/reels/plic/PLIC_1_2628.pdf







Why did they have so many dresses? - I counted 47 at least, that seems like an awful lot for even fairly wealthy people at the time.
Why did they have them in storage? - If they were living full-time in the convent, surely they were nuns, so why not sell/give away their old dresses?
Everything was bought in the US, so were they irish-americans who came home to the old country to become nuns, or were they Americans who just really wanted to be nuns in Ireland?
I am a dummy, the convent wasn't just a convent, it was run as a home for Aged and Virtuous Single Women, so presumably the Creamer sisters retired to live there in pious comfort.

Plus they were only approved for £210 in damages so either they got ripped off or the Board thought they were boosting the value of the stolen items, which isn't very nunly.
The only census records online are for 1901 and 1911 and I don't see their names on them which might mean they weren't in the country at that time, or maybe they were recorded under their new Nun names.

Pookah has a new favorite as of 19:27 on Sep 3, 2018

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Khazar-khum posted:

They probably kept every dress they ever owned. In 1916 it wasn't unusual for a lady of what we would call upper middle class to change her dress several times a day, depending on her activities. Some of the trims mentioned are very expensive, so again it wasn't unusual to salvage what they could from an old dress to add to a new one. My French-Canadian great-aunts used to do this, as well as saving every button they could from old or worn clothes. Buttons and trim could, and often still do, easily cost more than the fabric used for the clothes which they adorned.

Now that I think about it - the stuff that's listed was just what they had put away in storage; they must have had full wardrobes of other clothes with them in the convent/rest home - they must have been very comfortably-off. If I remember correctly, it was pretty traditional for well-off single women to retire to convents to live as paying-guests. They'd get the best of everything, so it'd be more like a nice residential hotel with nuns than any kind of lifelong penitential existence.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Sweevo posted:

Samuel Pepys diary is about 5% stuff that seems completely alien from a 21st century perspective and 95% the daily writings of a guy in his 20s talking about how he stayed up late drinking with his friends, or bragging about how his mistress gave him a handjob in the theatre.

The time he bought a mucky book bound in plain covers so no-one'd know what a dirty dirty man he was, brought it home, read it, wrote in cod-french/spanish exactly how it made him feel, then burned it because it was too filthy to put amongst his other books, is great!

http://twonerdyhistorygirls.blogspot.com/2009/12/men-behaving-badly-samuel-pepys-dirty.html

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I love that they are so superficially unremarkable - they are 3,000 years old and visually they could pass for fairly standard trousers today. Pants are universal, pants are eternal.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Zopotantor posted:

You can build ships out of concrete. There's an old one beached at Aptos (near Santa Cruz), CA.

And in my experience, it's almost a legal requirement that they be named with some kind of concrete-based pun - I know of one called 'Maid of Crete' and another called Cretegaff.

Concrete shipbuilders have a ponderous sense of humour.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I've just been reminded of how I learned to bless myself and say the Hail Mary in gobbledygook irish because in my school we had to say that prayer at the start of every class, and in Irish class it had to be in irish, except no-one ever bothered to teach me the words so I just learned to make the right noises.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I did not realise just how petite Queen Victoria was:

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Apparently she was considered small even for the period and by the rest of her family - like, they fretted over her nutrition when she was a girl because of it, and she herself complained that everyone grew up except her. Also the dress there was when she was an old lady and had shrunk a bit, down to about 4 ft 8 from her youthful height of around 5 foot.

Part of the article about the dress described the process of building up a dummy for it to stand on and fitting said dummy with appropriate underclothes, and all I could think was that she would have been so furious.

Pookah has a new favorite as of 18:30 on Sep 13, 2019

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Alhazred posted:

I think "fretting" is a huge understatement. The so called Kensington System that Victoria had to abide was completely stifling:
She could never be alone and had to sleep in her mother's room.
She could not walk down a stair without holding someone's hand.
She could not under any circumstances dance the waltz.
Her daily activities and behavior was recorded in pen and ink.

Tellingly the first thing Victoria did on her 18th birthday was to burn the Kensington System to the ground.

Ok, I did not know her childhood was that abusive, holy poo poo.

also

Azhais posted:

Or in other words she would not have been amused?
:golfclap:

Pookah has a new favorite as of 18:57 on Sep 13, 2019

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





System Metternich posted:



Louis Bourdaloue (1632-1704) was the son of a lawyer famed for his skill in rhetorics. At the early age of 15, Louis entered the Jesuit order with the goal to follow in his father's footsteps and excel at rhetorics. He soon attained a reputation for his excellent homilies, and from 1669 on he regularly held Mass and preached at the court of King Louis XIV. His homilies were both so interesting and downright riveting that all the court flocked to his services to listen to him, bent on not missing even a single word - and his homilies also were long. So, what's a noblewoman to do when she is sitting in church listening intently to her favourite preacher, when suddenly nature calls?

Why, she takes a sauciere with her and just lets go, of course! Some smart craftsmen soon realised that money was to be made there and started producing a slightly differently shaped sauciere which was easier to piss into, calling it the "Bourdalou"


Bourdalou female urinal made from leather at the Wellcome Collection. France, 18th century

And if you ever wondered what an 18th century French noblewoman pissing into a small pot looks like, then Louis XV's official court painter François Boucher has got you covered:


"The intimate Toilette" or "A woman who pees", mid-18th century

Nominative determinism strikes again!

edit: This joke only works if you know about the 'Portaloo' brand of portable toilets.

Pookah has a new favorite as of 09:16 on Nov 9, 2019

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Nucken Futz posted:

From my understanding, québécois french is closer to old timey french cuz it was sorta isolated from the classic frenglais which had of course "evolved" over time even though they deny it..

Source: married to a québécois.

I used to work with a really nice guy from Quebec. Obviously, he spoke french, and also english to a certain extent, but definitely not fluently. Anyway, he was working as a french language games tester, so it was playing through stuff in french and logging any issues with the translation. His bugs kept getting sent back by the translators as technically correct but only in extremely old-fashioned french, not modern french from France. So yeah, my understanding is that québécois french retains both vocabulary and grammatical rules that haven't been common use in french from France in a long time. It's pretty cool.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





The mule is cracking up lol

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Remulak posted:

In late with my Nero neck beard shot:


One of my very favorite parts of that holiday I had in Rome was getting to see all the portrait busts in the Capitolinum; Roman art is and was, frequently derided for being heavily dependent on copying the Greeks, but they did have an extremely important innovation of physical accuracy in portraiture, rather that idealization. A possibly wanky way of saying that Roman sculptural portraiture was frequently exceptionally unforgiving to the sitter. I'd maybe question the accuracy of the portraits of the very murderous Emperors. Is it a coincidence that the very murdery ones like Commodus look pretty hot in their portrait busts?

edit: like, look at this guy:



Traditionally supposed to be a portrait of Lucius Brutus, but it couldn't have been taken from the life, since it was made at least 300 years after L. Brutus died. That's not an idealization, that's someone specific. Thats someone contemporary. I really like Roman portraiture; its pragmatic and probably very honest.

Pookah has a new favorite as of 20:22 on Aug 30, 2020

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I used to have this very interesting book about life as a domestic servant in late-victorian Britain onwards to the mid-twentieth century:

https://www.amazon.com/Life-below-stairs-Domestic-Victorian/dp/0684155133

It was compiled in the '70s so the author was able to meet people who'd been servants back before the First World War. My copy vanished years ago, unfortunately, but it was a really interesting read, and yeah, the War completely upended the old social order.
By the twenties it was becoming harder and harder to get domestic staff - by that time, there was a definite stigma about being a servant, as opposed to working in a shop or a factory. People who in the past would have expected to have a cook and a maid were reduced to maybe having a daily woman to come in and do the cleaning each morning, and if she was reliable they'd count themselves extremely lucky.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





A running trend in fiction written at the time is that estate taxes aka 'death duties' were bigger than they had been in the past, and with so many young men dying in the War, plus the 'flu, you could have an estate being inherited several times in a few years, with taxes having to be paid each time. Another common theme was the collapse in the value of agricultural land - most big estates got their income from farming and that apparently became a lot less profitable. Land-rich, cash-poor was a common complaint.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I was just looking up something relating to the Norman invasion of Ireland, and came across a very interesting insight into the difference between what was considered proper behaviour in Irish and English Royal circles: According to the Chronicles of John Froissart, a man called Henry Castide was sent by the then English King to coach the 4 Irish kings (each province had its own king) on how to behave in the English court:

quote:

“Because the Irish language is as familiar to me as English, for I have always spoken it in my family, and introduce it among my grandchildren as much as I can, I have been chosen by our lord and king to teach and accustom the four Irish kings, who have sworn obedience for ever to England, to the manners of the English. I must say, that these kings who were under my management were of coarse manners and understandings; and, in spite of all I could do to soften their language and nature, very little progress has been made, for the would frequently return to their former coarse behaviour.

“I will more particularly relate the charge that was given me over them, and how I 580 managed it. The king of England intended these four kings should adopt the manners, appearance, and dress of the English, for he wanted to create them knights. He have them first a very handsome house in the city of Dublin for themselves and attendants, where I was ordered to resided with them, and never to leave the house without an absolute necessity. I lived with them for three or four days without any way interfering, that we might become accustomed to each other, and I allowed them to act just as they pleased. I observed, that as they sat at table, they made grimaces, that did not seem to me graceful nor becoming, and I resolved in my own mind to make them drop that custom. When these kings were seated at table, and the first dish was served, they would make their minstrels and principal servants sit beside them, and eat from their plates and drink from their cups. They told me, this was a praiseworthy custom of their country, where everything was in common but the bed. I permitted this to be done for three days; but on the fourth I ordered the tables to be laid out and covered properly, placing the four kings at an upper table, the minstrels at another below, and the servants lower still. They looked at each other, and refused to eat, saying I had deprived them of their old custom in which they had been brought up. I replied with a smile, to appease them, that their custom was not decent nor suitable to their rank, nor would it be honourable for them to continue it; for that now they should conform to the manners of the English, and to instruct them in these particulars was the motive of my residence with them, having been so ordered by the king of England and his council. When they heard this they made no further opposition to whatever I proposed, from having themselves under the obedience of England, and continued good-humouredly to persevere in it as long as I staid with them.

“They had another custom I knew to be common in the country, which was the not wearing breeches. I had, in consequence, plenty of breeches made of linen and cloth, which I gave to the kings and their attendants, and accustomed them to wear them. I took away many rude articles, as well in their dress as other things, and had great difficulty at the first to induce them to wear robes of silken cloth, trimmed with squirrel-skin or minever, for the kings only wrapped themselves up in an Irish cloak. In riding, they neither used saddles nor stirrups, and I had some trouble to make them conform in this respect to the English manners.

Source: From Chronicles of England, France and Spain and the Surrounding Countries, by Sir John Froissart
https://elfinspell.com/FroissartVol2/Book4Chap60.html

tl;dr Irish kings thought it right and proper to eat with, and share everything with their senior household servants, a very different attitude to the very strict hierarchy in English and Norman courtly circles.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Red Bones posted:

The circumstances of the Norman invasion of Ireland are kind of farcical. A regional Irish king hired a bunch of Norman mercenaries to assist him in a succession dispute, and then the noble died during the fighting and the Normans were finding it so easy to conquer Irish territory that they just kept on going with it. Then the English king joined the invasion because the Norman mercenaries were technically his subjects, and he didn't want them to establish their own fiefdoms outside of his control. The rest is (bloody, miserable, colonial) history.

I was just posting about this in another thread, it's what got me thinking about that period. Just the absolute stupidity of inviting an entirely foreign, entirely mercenary army into your own country to 'help' you regain power without considering that maybe they'll decide to just keep going and take over themselves.

Read about the king in question Diarmit mac murchuda. His historical reputation is basically - 'evil gobshite, so evil that when he died no priest would give him the last rites and he's buried in a ditch somewhere, who cares where.'

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Sucrose posted:

Interesting. About what year was this?

Just had a little look and apparently it happened in 1394-1395, during Richard II's fist expedition to Ireland.

^^^Iceland had similar laws in the 19th century - I believe it was illegal to marry unless you had land^^^

Pookah has a new favorite as of 10:54 on Feb 24, 2021

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





This InterNordic slapfight reminded me of this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kahnb3qnm0

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





In Ireland we have rude terms for people who live in marshy areas - we call them boghoppers and mucksavages.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





BasicLich posted:

this individual was 10 years old during the Jack the Ripper murders and Slavery was banned in Brazil

He was 11 when the Eiffel Tower was completed, when Van Gogh painted Starry Night and when Aspirin was patented.

He was 12 during the Wounded Knee Massacre, the first Electric Chair Execution, The invention of the cardboard box, when Kaiser Wilhelm II dismissed Otto Von Bismarck

He was 14 when Basketball was invented, when the Nutcracker Suite premiered in St. Petersburg

My great-uncle died/deserted at Gallipoli in WW1. My ma is in her 60's, I'm in my early 40's. My Granddad married very late in life, so we're kind of a generation off timewise. He was a lovely gentle man who lived an extremely violent early life. He fought in the Irish Civil War in the '20s and apparently was a deadshot with ironsights.
He could kill at a mile, easily.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





I belive that metal ships capable of withstanding ice pressure were kind of a new thing at the time, and metal-hulled ordinary ship would crack immediately, whereas wooden ships could flex at bit.
I've read Shackleton's account of the Endurance expedition, and I, no joking, wept when I got to the bit where he finally got back to where the rest of the crew were waiting on Elephant Island.
"All well?"
"All well boss"

It's an amazing and inspiring read.

Shackleton was an insanely good leader.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Alhazred posted:

Another polar fact: Scott actually helped prove that the continental drift theory was correct. He found fossils of the glossopteris trees that showed that Antarctica was once joined with other continents. Unfortunately for him, carrying big rocks in his backpack didn't exactly improve his chances of survival.

With polar ship it was more about how it was constructed, rather than what material they used. If a ship got caught in the ice it would be crushed, even if was made of wood. Nansen contructed a ship that was designed to be pushed up instead of down for one of his expeditions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fram_(ship)

The Fram!
A roundy ship, designed to rise up and out of pressure if it got frozen into the ice.
I loving love polar exploration.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





All of shackletons accounts of his polar explorations are extremely readable and gripping, but another really good and interesting book on the subject is "Home of the Blizzard" by Douglas Mawson.
They set up their base camp in a place where the catabatic antarctic winds came down, so their cabin was in line with hurricane-force winds all day, every day.
I got to see Mawsons memorial in New Zealand a few years ago, it was really cool :unsmith:

Edit: if anyone is interested in reading about early 20th century antarctic exploration, but doesn't want to read about avoidable death, stick to Shackleton.
In an environment extremely likely to kill, Ernest Shackleton never lost a single person. He could have reached the south Pole first, but he knew they'd all die doing so, so he turned back. Shackleton was an extremely decent man.

Pookah has a new favorite as of 21:00 on Mar 9, 2022

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶






So goddamn true. The norgwegians were actively demonstrating the value of using skis and sled dogs when the British navy were committing to horses and loving MEN dragging sleds

Edit: I started reading the memoir of Nansen and the fram, but was immediately put off by the bit where they shot an Arctic fox for funnsies.
Those guys were competent, but they'd
were also shitbirds.
Shackletons crew killed and ate a baby albatross, but they were starving at the time and felt bad about it. Nansen never felt bad about being a shitbird victorian hunter so gently caress him.

Pookah has a new favorite as of 22:06 on Mar 9, 2022

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Alhazred posted:

Nansen helped hundred of thousands of refugees and saved Norway from a famine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fridtjof_Nansen#Statesman_and_humanitarian
I don't think one dead fox is enough to tip the scales in his disfavor.

...:mad:... yeah, ok that probably does make up for it.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Both me and my brother were notorious in our
shared friend group for vanishing from parties.
It was widely referred to as "Doing a Connolly*"

Weirdly enough, we're all Irish, so apparently we were even more severe a case of it than our compatriots. Can't speak for my brother, but I've always been an early riser, even when massively hungover, and I hate waiting around for other people to get up.
I used to walk 5-6 miles home at 6 o'clock in the morning rather than wait for other people to get up.

*not our actual name

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





In the French city of Anger, there was a neo-classical sculptor whose surname was David. So he is customarily known as David D'Anger.
In our family he is known as Dangerous Dave, the Fear of Anger.
He was a very decent neo-classical sculptor, not innovative, but a very competent portrait sculptor.

edit: spelling error

Pookah has a new favorite as of 15:12 on Mar 28, 2022

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Philippe posted:

Is there a possibility for him to get beatified by the Catholic Church, you think?

He appears to have been a genuinely decent guy

Wikipedia posted:

As an example of his benevolence of character may be mentioned his rushing off to the sickbed of Rouget de Lisle, the author of the Marseillaise Hymn, modelling and carving him in marble without delay, making a lottery of the work, and sending to the poet in the extremity of need the proceeds.

So no chance.

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





Philippe posted:

No chance for a St. Anger, then.

Bummer.

Bummer indeed :(

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pookah
Aug 21, 2008

🪶Caw🪶





The guy/s who took days off because their daughters had their periods is pretty :3:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply