|
Rollofthedice posted:oh man bad question time I think those were submitted by the audience.
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 03:03 |
|
|
So all three aren't even on the stage at once? This is fairly pathetic.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
The only thing people are going to remember about O'Mally tonight is that he wears a kilt.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
That's the second time he's brought up the "15 years of executive experience"
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
Spiky Ooze posted:So all three aren't even on the stage at once? This is fairly pathetic. The DNC will do... something? if they are all on stage at the same time, since then it's a debate, and the DNC said they can't do any debates other than the officially DNC sanctioned ones
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:34
|
|
|
Hi Bernie
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:37
|
|
|
"as opposed to some other unnamed candidates  for me it was a no-brainer"
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
Ralp posted:"as opposed to some other unnamed candidates Well he's certainly not directly attacking any other candidates
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
memy posted:The DNC will do... something? if they are all on stage at the same time, since then it's a debate, and the DNC said they can't do any debates other than the officially DNC sanctioned ones Oh for sure the DNC is at fault for the terrible format. Fuckers. At least Bernie is getting in a few new jabs here.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
That last audience question Q&A session with Bernie was adorable.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:54
|
|
|
Yeah Bernie doin a lot better in this format. I think he only had one dodge too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
Smiling is probably something Bernie needs to do more.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
Xelkelvos posted:Smiling is probably something Bernie needs to do more.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
Xelkelvos posted:Smiling is probably something Bernie needs to do more. Has to be a smile with no teeth though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
Honestly this format is a lot easier to follow. It'd be more interesting to have all the candidates there together, but at least this way you can hear the entire answer.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
Coatlicue posted:Honestly this format is a lot easier to follow. It'd be more interesting to have all the candidates there together, but at least this way you can hear the entire answer. It also provides a better avenue for follow up. On the other hand, it's just generally less of a clusterfuck compared to whatever the Republicans would do.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:07
|
|
|
Hah, if the RNC wanted one of these, it'd have to be an eight hour special.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
yeah I like it! Seems like a good format to supplement to the regular debates, and scheduled at a good time (not friday night, that sucks, but this month I mean, at this stage of primary campaigns). I guess it's similar to the meet-and-greet or whatever the republicans did but that was completely stupid and worthless, there were so many candidates and it was before any real debates even happened.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
Hillary could moderate. She's the only one with experience spending that much time talking
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
Coatlicue posted:Honestly this format is a lot easier to follow. It'd be more interesting to have all the candidates there together, but at least this way you can hear the entire answer. Huge downside in my opinion is it's essentially just ad time. Rachel Maddow is one smart lady, but these people are too prepared to be flustered by just the moderator.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
Ralp posted:yeah I like it! Seems like a good format to supplement to the regular debates, and scheduled at a good time (not friday night, that sucks, but this month I mean, at this stage of primary campaigns). I guess it's similar to the meet-and-greet or whatever the republicans did but that was completely stupid and worthless, there were so many candidates and it was before any real debates even happened. I agree, I'm liking this too, it could never replace the debates but it's nice to actually hear the candidates talk for longer than 60 seconds at a time. I wouldn't mind having another, especially since the DNC is dead set on not expanding the debate schedule
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:14
|
|
|
Hillary wants to help fat white people
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:16
|
|
|
Am I hearing a lot of people say robust more often because of Veep or are people saying robust a lot more because of Veep?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:22
|
|
|
Oh another bad part is you can only watch the person you wanted to see have their segment, then stop watching. This is a really bad format even if it seems less "gotcha" or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
I aggree with Hillary that there should be the possibility that maybe there should be considered the discussion about potentially using the death penalty.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
The next Democratic debate is on a Saturday night so it could be worse than this in terms of people not watching it
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
what the heck is this
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Hillary dodging the REAL QUESTIONS
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
HIllary should have said Marco Rubio.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
BOOOOOOOOOO like for real, that's an actual substantive question, name literally anything that any of your opponents support that you think isn't the absolute worst, you shouldn't be able to spin out of that poo poo even in a cushy environment like this tinstaach has issued a correction as of 03:39 on Nov 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
lol at trying to straddle the fence on the introvert vs extrovert question
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:HIllary should have said Marco Rubio. "Marco Rubio, because at least I know I can get his help for real immigration reform and a path to citizenship."
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
Lord of Pie posted:lol at trying to straddle the fence on the introvert vs extrovert question That was a worse answer than the VP one
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:38
|
|
|
Hillary is so good at making these broad general references to nebulous topics like discrimination or whatever without invoking any kind of specific proposals besides "we'll take a hard look at it" and its kind of nauseating really
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:42
|
|
|
It's ironic that Rachel asked that vp question, because I recall her (maddow) being on another talk show, I think Trevor Noah, and he asked her who she would vote for if she had to vote for a gop candidate. Maddow refused to pick someone.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
I mean poo poo, say Donald Trump, wait for people to stop laughing, then talk about how he said some good stuff about the VA and UHC. Is that so toxic?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
She even mentioned that the one she endorses gets hurt. She could have followed it with, "So definitely Donald Trump *WINK*."
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
tinstaach posted:I mean poo poo, say Donald Trump, wait for people to stop laughing, then talk about how he said some good stuff about the VA and UHC. Is that so toxic? it might stump the Trump and they want him in the race because he is a bull in the GOP's chinashop.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
Pavlov posted:She even mentioned that the one she endorses gets hurt. She could have followed it with, "So definitely Donald Trump *WINK*." I think she was ready to do that but then decided that no publicity is ever bad publicity for him, which idk I think is probably true. Naming Rubio and rattling off a few words about immigration, as someone suggested, was probably the best strategy there imo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 03:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 03:03 |
|
|
How did Bernie do?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 06:02
|
|
