|
What a thoroughly... enjoyable debate. "Just" adults rehashing ideas they more or less share, they just need to agree on the details. Clinton came off as clearly the most articulate, realistic, prepared and leader-worthy of the three. But it's pretty obvious that's not a "coronation", as a lot of people were saying earlier - she is getting questioned, tested and interrogated. Bernie is cool as an idealistic visionary - but it's a role that, I think, he should satisfy himself with; I think I'm not alone in having the feeling that it's almost like it's his campaign manager (who, otherwise, comes off as a broish rear end in a top hat) that's pushing him to attack Clinton instead of focusing on the issues and the message? And the end effect is that he's getting himself on Hillary's poo poo list instead of improving his chances of working with her. The Wall Street jab, though, that was heartfelt, genuine and understandable. And O'Malley started to sound like he may be actually a good candidate in 8 years? But he won't be Hillary's VP, so I wonder what he's planning to do in the meantime. I'd like a debate focused on the environment (especially in view of the Paris talks) and women's issues next time. The first should favour Sanders and the second one Clinton, so that should be all right, correct?
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 11:22
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 11:19 |
|