|
Valentin posted:It is really embarrassing (the Bernie campaign spokesperson is now calling any idea that they wanted to avoid foreign policy "nonsense") and should be noted, but I think it's reasonable to wonder whether or not it would get a lot of attention or be dismissed by the news-watching public as irrelevant he-said she-said. It comes down to whether or not Dems will buy it (Republicans are always on board for some trash talking). And that will likely come down to what's said at the debate.
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 06:31 |
|
|
Acquilae posted:did bernie just relate global warming to terrorism? Climate change is going to create massive problems that will inevitably cause inter- and intra-state conflict. He's not wrong.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:15
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:poo poo, that's the first time this year that I've heard a "I was talking to a voter" story that didn't end with me rolling my eyes. Me too, it's really weird to hear.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:Is there a diplomatic reason that the Obama administration does not want to use "Radical Islam" and instead "Jihadist Islam"? My guess is that it's a language issue that's been carefully selected by someone who knows more about Islam than I. "Radicalism" sound a lot like "Islam is radical" and allows anyone to point to part of Islam and declare it radical, "jihadist Islam" applies to only self-described jihadist groups.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
Bad Caller posted:Nobody is looking good with the dead silent crowd lol Yeah, it seemed like a cool idea initially but as it is it's like watching a sitcom without the laugh track. So to speak.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:30
|
|
|
Hillary going for the blatant Russian document bait to gin up a little fear? Really?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Armyman25 posted:How do you vet refugees anyway? Check them against current intelligence of known ISIS/AQ associates, interview them repeatedly and check their story for inconsistencies.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
O'Malley little chuckle is so cute 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
Bad Caller posted:Real talk why doesn't Hillary talk about her support of single payer healthcare coverage in the 90s? Like it was unpopular then but now a lot more people are in support and it'd take wind out of Bernie's sails Hillary is already aiming for the general and clearly doesn't want to have to market universal single payer (although she really should but I'm not focus groups and policy advisors).
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
Sanders really need to get to the point. The long stump speech intros are becoming a little intolerable. (But it's clearly playing well with the crowd.)
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:53
|
|
|
Things are heating up. Dickinson herding these cats like nobody's business, love it. Also oh god another lovely Xmas movie save us all I already know I'm going to watch it 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:I also have to admit as someone who is fervent for Bernie that he needs to start being substantive or he's toast, he can't keep stump speeching Yeah Hillary's $12/hour answer isn't what I want at all, but she came off as someone who gave a direct answer and was tamping down the crazy idealism.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
Hillary has been waiting for this moment 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:04
|
|
|
Bullfrog posted:It was a stun-blow. Meant to throw Bernie off. It kind of did, he can't go after her directly. O'Malley really going after Hillary on his behalf though, dang.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:07
|
|
|
Ugh guys keep it to the gunchat thread that's what it's there for
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:11
|
|
|
Sanders responding right after Hillary with "what you said BUT MORE" is surprisingly effective
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:12
|
|
|
Whoa twitter question is 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
Twitter getting used correctly as a fact-checking mechanism 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
Silver Nitrate posted:It's starting to get nastyyyyyy Yeah, Hillary is actually on the defensive here, she's retreated to "I agree with you both" positions. Smart move on her part, but it's not the kind of attitude she was able to take in the first debate.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AndyGrewal
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
Motto posted:stop doing this website poo poo Yeah it's not cute. Here's the direct link to The Tweet. Grewal is a smart cookie.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:19
|
|
|
AlternateNu posted:I love this debate. I don't even feel a need to drink. It's so weird being sober. Devils Affricate posted:To be fair, the last GOP was much worse with the website name dropping Oh every single one of them website drops it's horrible. It's just not company O'Malley should be keeping.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:so I just got home and I guess Clinton got killed and is now a ghost? Not really. But O'Malley and Sanders are hitting her from both sides and she's not doing as great as in the first debate.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:24
|
|
|
Jeez mods lay off the email questions. Hillary correctly running with it to bash the Rs' craziness
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
armoredgorilla posted:Where did that amazing grand slam on hillary from Twitter go, I can't find it, I want to retweet it forever I gotchu. Unless the slam in question was a completely different tweet on the CBS website feed, I'm watching it on TV.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:36
|
|
|
Hillary did you really just go there You can do better than that
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:40
|
|
|
Can this guy moderate all the debates
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
If anyone wants to learn more about John Dickerson, he's actually really cool.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:44
|
|
|
badatom posted:It's really frustrating that the Republicans get to do debates on Easy Mode. They would get demolished by these moderators and questions. And if someone turns up the difficulty even a little they throw a freaking tantrum.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:46
|
|
|
That was a good debate y'all. Shifty Pony posted:For everyone remarking about how much better this is than the Republican debates: there is no way you could have this sort of questioning with 7+ people on the stage. There just isn't enough time. Yeah they just bounce from crazy person to crazy person, there's barely time for a single take on an issue.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:53
|
|
|
Shakenbaker posted:I'll be goddamned if I'm going to watch people talk about twitter. Aw but we got to see Hillary and Sanders hug it out and O'Malley do the thumbs-up
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 04:58
|
|
|
BeOSPOS posted:So who won tonight? The Democratic Party  ...I honestly can't say, Sanders and O'Malley did well and Hillary didn't say all the right things but she's clearly aiming for the general. I really do think the Democratic Party won, the debate was engaging, the candidates were respectful and policy-oriented, the moderators were on point. It was some good poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 05:20
|
|
|
FuriousxGeorge posted:I love that Hillary caricature. Ann Telnaes is the poo poo and she draws Hillary great.  
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 05:24
|
|
|
Bad Caller posted:Then just don't let casinos open or allow credit card companies to do that But liberty and free markets government regulation let people have the freedom to make bad decisions etc.  (also lobbyists)
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 06:31 |
|
|
MeatwadIsGod posted:So was this debate worth watching? I got the impression from the first one that Bernie treated it more like a stump speech than a debate, but it seemed like neither he nor Clinton were a clear winner to me. I've just gotten burned out on the election cycle and probably need to purge for a month before I care again. I enjoyed it as a rational discussion of policy, but you aren't missing anything if you skip it and purge for a month. It's not even 2016 yet, save your strength.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 22:08
|
|