|
Angepain posted:I disagree, the more nonsensical this ends up being the better. Exactly, let Adams win for 150 years. Adams corpse for pres
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2015 15:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 12:00 |
|
|
Although I kind of get it the idea of giving the VP to the runner up is so ridiculous I'm amazed it lasted as long as it did.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2015 08:05
|
|
|
foobardog posted:I am from North Carolina originally, so there are three Presidents born there, arguably. Jackson is arguable, because he was born near the border, and claimed to be from the South Carolina side, but legend has it was the North Carolina side. The other two are Polk and Andrew Johnson. So yes, my state is responsible for some of the worst presidents. Of course, every last one of these bastards hosed off to Tennessee for their political careers, but still... Hey don't spoil elections that haven't happened yet 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
It doesn't matter who you elect on slavery because that shits gonna ride around for another half a century anyway. The momentum from the south is just too powerful.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2015 05:51
|
|
|
My daddy was a federalist and Ill die a federalist too!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2015 20:35
|
|
|
Proposition Joe posted:The Federalist party has consistently nominated Massachusetts born patriots, hopefully the Federalist party will last forever. The future definitely looks bright for them I mean they lasted for over a decade.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Im a hippie pacifist and also wanna abolish slavery so Clinton it is! Edit: I also wanna thank QuoProQuid for keeping up with this, I'm sure it's a daunting task so I wanna say I totally appreciate it! RagnarokAngel has issued a correction as of 17:26 on Dec 29, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2015 17:22
|
|
|
Holding my nose for King/Ross. What a lovely election year.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
Corek posted:What I think is unusual is that there is no 100% pro-slavery candidate here, certainly at least not on the level Andrew Jackson would soon be. I can't wait till we get past the civil war I feel too many decisions are based on how the person feels about slaves because...yeah.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
I'm trying to not use historical knowledge to decide against Andrew Jackson because that seems against the spirit of the thread. That said, JQA for life.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
Second verse, same as the first. JQA motherfucker.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
Wirt it is. Tired of those drat freemasons.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
Holy crap what horseshit are these candidates.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
Neutron Bandit posted:How can Birney Sanders possibly lose? It's our Christian duty to end the misery of the enslaved. And send them packing because they can't be integrated. I mean I voted for Birn but oh man.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
I still feel the Birn, it lights a fire in my heart.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
Corek posted:Also being a "dark cabal" doesn't jive with our opinion on Freemasons. It's merely to distract the masses who think they've killed us off.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 25, 2016 13:38
|
|
|
Voting for the dead guy, op.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure outside some ironic votes it's gonna be 100% for one guy.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2016 04:54
|
|
|
So it's finally come to this.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
#3 Padre, you've done so much you deserve a break, even if the circumstances are less than ideal.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2016 16:51
|
|
|
Haha Seymour you piece of poo poo *pulls for Grant*
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:People poo poo on Grant a lot but he was probably the last president until...FDR? who gave even half a poo poo about black people (even if he was just doing it for votes). I really think he just looks so bad because he follows Abraham "motherfucking" Lincoln and especially in the context of his time he was a pretty solid dude.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:It’s amazing how little time it took for Lincoln to go from “eh, we’re considering voting for the rebel party in the middle of a civil war” to “undisputed top three presidents of all time”. Of the surveys included in Wikipedia’s table, FDR is the other president with that honor. There were five months between the election and the assassination—seven if you consider the election a foregone conclusion after the victory in Atlanta. I admit I personally think Lincoln's legacy was overblown and without a civil war and an assassination he might have been seen as a milquetoast president, though of course that brings up a lot of questions about whether a man is defined by the actions he takes or the time and place he was in. I legit think FDR is the best president we have had though and will vote for him for 5, no, 6! terms
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2016 14:46
|
|
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Is this historical hipsterism? Not exactly, more that I think he's defined by the events that surrounded him and were circumstances different he might not have been so popular. He wanted to keep the status quo, if possible, but circumstances forced him into greatness. There's not really anything wrong with that, a lot of great men are defined by their reactions to the challenges put before them.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Votin' fer the Greenbacks, metal money worst money Ops had a lot on his plate, have faith.
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
As a Massachusetts lady my loyalty will not falter.
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 12:00 |
|
|
metalloid posted:Prohibition it is. This is a terrible election. SA decides, every election is the worst election.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2016 11:04
|
|