|
Clinton/Burr to keep the dastardly federal government under control while also kicking British rear end.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2015 17:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 16:07 |
|
|
I think sticking with historical elections only makes sense cause it would quickly diverge and we wouldn't even get to vote for Bryan, Longs, and Debs. But it would be cool if someone came up with a timeline that did include all our chosen presidents after the fact or something.
|
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2015 02:39
|
|
CuwiKhons posted:Unless I missed something recently, the US Treasury hasn't made any decisions on that yet. They were going to move forward with taking Hamilton off the $10, but then "Hamilton" came out on Broadway and apparently they've been inundated with demands to leave him there ever since. Meanwhile I don't think there's anybody at all defending Jackson being on the $20 so I don't know why they haven't gone ahead and dropped his rear end yet. Wasn't the $20 redesigned relatively recently? I always assumed this was the reason for choosing the $10 over the $20.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2016 03:07
|
|