|
this is an excellent thread idea and I can't wait for 1860! And I'll be voting for every Adams I can.
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2015 20:51
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 02:20 |
|
|
drat John Jay! drat everyone who won’t drat John Jay!! drat everyone that won’t put lights in his windows and sit up all night damning John Jay!!!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
Lemming posted:Isn't it going to take 10 minutes before we all start killing each other if Washington isn't our The Whiskey Rebellion probably would go down either way.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
George Clinton! Let's conquer Canada and make Congress into a Parliament Funkadelic.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
Remember that electors cannot cast their votes for two candidates from the same state, so Iredell/Johnston, Washington/Jefferson, Adams/Adams, and Burr/Jay/Clinton are all out if you're playing as a strict constructionist.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
I'm surprised the Founders didn't go whole hog with their Roman Republic love and have two presidents with authority alternating between every day.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
Voting straight federalist/whig for those sweet, sweet internal improvements. Let's build some fuckin CANALS
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 19:27
|
|
|
I've been dreading this vote because I really, deeply love JQA and loving loathe Calhoun with every bone of my body.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Voting Clay/Sergeant mostly for Sergeant, who I'd never heard of before. Clay is a bastard but a pragmatic one who probably would have been a decent president (and certainly better than King Andrew).
|
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
Octatonic posted:Hey hey, anti-masons are crypto-nothing. We are real, truthful citizens who have had enough of the cryptography and related deciets of those elitist, scummy probably-apostates. them and their revellings  
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2016 18:19
|
|
|
Webster/Granger just by virtue of being the most anti-slavery ticket, as low as that bar is in this period.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 20:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 02:20 |
|
|
Bryter posted:Granger seems pretty decent all things considered, and Webster's at the very least tolerable Daniel Webster was pretty decent for his whole career but then threw his legacy away by supporting the Compromise of 1850, going from beloved Whig statesman to detested turncoat instantly.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 21:27
|
|