|
Octatonic posted:Quincy is like the lamest president, and the weak Adams line is a mere artifact of history. The only remainder of the once-proud legacy is a mid-tier beer company. I demand immaculate, anachronistic dynasties. Speaking of that, he left out a non-presidential portion of said early american political dynasties: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Adams
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2015 20:32 |
|
|
# ¿ May 3, 2024 17:37 |
|
Fellis posted:Burr sounds like an old timey Trump. Maybe if the donald went and shot some other politician in a duel he would be more popular Didn't work out so well for Burr though.
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2015 22:42 |
|
Thump! posted:To be fair, none of us would be allowed to vote were we alive back then. Surprise surprise, poor people from the 21st century know how much of a shitfucking loon states rights are. As a not-poor white man from Boston I probably had a decent chance of being able to vote. And being anti-slavery would make me fit right in with my preferred candidate so far of Adams
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2015 01:09 |
|
John Adams will continue to dominate these elections until he no longer runs...which will be fairly soon. We're going to need to take a break from the Adams clan for a couple of a elections too, which is pretty sad.
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2015 19:17 |
|
Goddamn these elections suck.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2015 19:54 |
|
Rufus King all the way baby!
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 02:38 |
|
I no longer am Federalist until I die
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 18:09 |
|
Wait, so DeWitt Clinton finished a massive government project ahead of schedule and under budget...and also basically single handedly orchestrated the Missouri compromise apparently? What a boss.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 17:41 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:DeWitt ran the Erie Canal project well, but a good portion of its success was the result of factors beyond his control. The Panic of 1819 was a spectacular boon for the canal and Clinton's personal career. Just throwing out there, once more, that this thread is fantastic and extremely interesting.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 18:31 |
|
Cthulhu Dreams posted:I wish you could vote for JQA + Nathan Sanford. As an Australian my knowledge of american history begins in 1861, I had now idea of how much a terrible person Andrew Jackson is. Good thing we put him on our money for some reason.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2016 00:52 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:putting jackson on the twenty is the greatest historical troll of all time and i salute whoever came up with it all those decades ago He was also on (at various times) the $5, the $10, the $50, the $10,000 and the Confederate $1,000. Because lol.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2016 00:58 |
|
Proposition Joe posted:I support this idea of making up Presidential candidates from Massachusetts, to ensure we always have one. Easiest way to win my vote.
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2016 03:02 |
|
Dear lord...another terrible election. I can't wait to vote to start the civil war.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2016 16:41 |
|
CuwiKhons posted:Can I just vote for Alexander Hamilton's corpse? I feel like it'd be more useful than any of these idiots. ...we said for every election ever.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2016 17:17 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:If it makes you feel any better, I'm pretty sure that a Birney election would cause a civil war, both among the states and within the abolitionist movement. Ibogaine posted:Birney seems to be the man for you then. He even wants Mexico to take of the kids gloves when dealing with the seditious scum in Texas. Looks like I made the right choice.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2016 17:18 |
|
|
# ¿ May 3, 2024 17:37 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:They've sent several notices to Washington about their secession but they keep getting lost in the mail. I think it's because we've erased history immediately after each election. They can't remember why they were mad exactly and just throw the letter in a fire because no one knows what they were talking about, and assumes they were drunk when they wrote it. At least that's how I sees it.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2016 21:52 |