|
Dear WotC, Please don't be disrespectful to the game. You might not care, but others do.
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 06:44 |
|
|
beergod posted:I assume not much has changed and the cheapest way to get the cards you want is to buy singles, right? These packs are a special limited edition reprints-only set that they seed with valuable constructed cards. Normally you get them the old fashioned way of being around when they're opened and building up a collection. For the meta check out mtgtop8.com and find something that tickles your fancy. The new set has really brought the price down on poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:"Gods among the people, wow, that's such a cool idea. So inspiring, we've never seen this before!" Inspiring from Gideon's Therosian perspective where the gods live in the sky, hurl thunderbolts and tidal waves, and kill all your friends, yes.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:She appears much lighter skinned in the original art. Tan. I'm not surprised there are black people present, you dingus. More interesting is how her eyes are silver in the left picture, and remarked upon as silver in the story yesterday, and green in the other. Could be some mood thing.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
I don't see why magic needs cat snakes since ferret is already a supportred creature type 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
Marketing New Brain posted:I enjoyed damage on the stack for the depth it brought, but if you've ever played in limited against someone when they didn't know about it and you did, it felt like cheating.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
That enchantment is not garbo at all. It's aether vial that can do 'or less', hits all spell types, and works twice per untap all for the cost of 1u extra??? e: It lets you tap out and keep up counterspells! This card could singlehandedly bring back control possibly.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:
Not Hand to Mouth? Really?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
Serperoth posted:From Top Level Podcast, according to the link I saw on Tumblr This will need an errata since it removes the discarding half of cycling costs as well lol.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
I can see Tales' point. Here's the explicit text: 702.28a Cycling is an activated ability that functions only while the card with cycling is in a player’s hand. “Cycling [cost]” means “[Cost], Discard this card: Draw a card.” It's open for interpretation I guess and the card's intent is clear. Still, lol.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
What's the latest cephalid breakfast shell these days? Either that or ad naus are how to turn drawing your whole deck into a win.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2017 18:55
|
|
|
A red counterspell. You can stifle your lose the game trigger with disallow too. I'll wait for saffron olive to break it I think.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
Cauldron Moose posted:I'm fairly certian i'm wrong, but shouldn't exiling a spell as it's resolving mean that you stop doing what it says on the rest of it? Don't think so. Nothing interrupts the steps of resolution of a spell ability detailed on a card. In fact, all abilities are atomic.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
I've lost more than one game online where I click a bloodthrone vampire and because MODO sucks you can't tell if it worked or is just lagging so you click again and it eats itself to pump itself. So adding another is mostly just a practical consideration.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 22:22
|
|
|
It resets your exert guys, mazes an attacker and surprise blocks another, saves a dude when they spend a trick to win combat, or just rebuys an ETB trigger. Seems fine.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:why is it only "bad players" who might not understand the "and" is exclusive and not inclusive, what is with this thread and wanting to poo poo on people who might just be newer or not know the rules as well bad player spotted lol
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
suicidesteve posted:Have you read this thread, never mind played actual paper Magic, or god forbid a prerelease? They're 100% correct. "In response to you declaring attacks, I block like this."
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 19:50
|
|
|
This stream is really bad. The people are unfunny and play slower than molasses. Things I've learned: - aftermath is irrelevant for limited, looks like - not too high pressure it seems, you can durdle and build bricks and ramp and poo poo
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
Star Man posted:I am told that prerelease packs are seeded to have decent rares in them, but almost every prerelease I've done calls loving bullshit. There's no way they're capable of this.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
Spiderdrake posted:They probably could if they wanted to. This would mean making a separate rare sheet that biases towards cards that they think are good (by what metric?), put in to a separate pile of packs that have to be kept separate from your normal production output, at around the right quantity for one single event. It's totally out of the question.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Even without the exile clause, it wouldn't be the same game object that was discarded, since it went to the stack. Something is off here. Either it goes to the graveyard by way of exile, or by way of exile then the stack. So in both cases it's indirect and by your logic couldn't be found. Except the release notes say it doesn't work that way...
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2017 07:49
|
|
|
Subways Jared posted:Where are people doing their playtesting for stuff like STD decks? Are the two most popular options still Xmage, and Cockatrice, like I'm reading in the OP? The modo beta is good, if you can get in. I was kicked last year for some reason. I think they didn't appreciate my feature requests like revamp the trading system, battlefield layout, and pairing queue and probably wanted just notes on broken new cards heh. Also just proxying up some poo poo and jamming with friends. There was a good tool that let you print 5ish cards on to one card-sized piece of paper so you could 'play' 5 decks with one set of stock that was very handy. I think though the canonical answer is 'don't play standard'.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 23:29
|
|
|
ShaneB posted:Yeah I haven't listened in a LOOOOOONG time. I agree that GAM is a bit better for viable (there I said it) stuff. This is probably true but the attitude on the carsts are so different. Tlp is fun to listen to and their enthusiasm for everything (usually bad things) is super strong. Gerry and co epitomise the mtg player everything is poo poo cynicism ethos too strongly.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 17:09
|
|
|
 https://twitter.com/HeleneBergeot/status/853340241683333120 What's funny is I know for a fact the guy who did this doesn't even own a card and lives no where near Renton
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 06:44 |
|
|
JerryLee posted:I'm expecting so many bad players to not recognize/understand that the attack trigger doesn't need to have a counter to remove in order to place a counter Marshall and LSV completely got it wrong in the set review lol
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 19:02
|
|