|
I feel curmudgeony just looking at those cards and don't want them to be real. Maybe it's time to take a break if I'm getting cranky about cardboard.
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 09:18 |
|
|
Ferrinus posted:I think that's just the new, no-ambiguities way to say "{1}" now, just because that seems less insane than any alternative. Well no, it specifically means "1 colourless". It can't mean "{1}" because that is colour agnostic in a cost.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 18:11
|
|
|
♦ Instant edit: Wait, that's out of flavour. Fixed.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 18:14
|
|
|
The Human Crouton posted:Mods on mtgsalvation have confirmed that they are real. But what do the Rockers have to say?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm not really sure how that made it in.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
So, who is templating and proxying these up for cubes?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Can we draft it?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
Everyone got their CC statements after buying too much BFZ sealed product hoping for expeditions. Personally, I haven't been to FNM in about a month, but that's more to do with my kids' bed times.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2015 05:06
|
|
|
Shouldn't that be a 1/1? Edit: ah, nm, I get it.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
No one should play Magic honestly.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
So you just answered your own question, right? What's the problem. edit: Sorry, that sounds a bit aggressively worded, doesn't it? But yeah, you read the text and then it clears it up, right?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:Yes, it does. A green creature taps for G, and a colourless creature taps for ◇, and you can use either of those to pay the 1 in a cost. You can only use G to pay G, and you can only use ◇ to pay ◇. Heh, I guess I'm eating my words about this being simple, because... no, right? quote:For each colored mana in this spell’s total cost, you may tap an untapped creature of that color you control rather than pay that mana. For each generic mana in this spell’s total cost, you may tap an untapped creature you control rather than pay that mana. As written you just can't pay ◇ with convoke, right? And that's fine and seems pretty apparent to me, but whatever. (they'll probably change it?)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 21:56
|
|
|
Niton posted:there is no mana source which produces Generic Mana.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 22:18
|
|
|
Allstone posted:and it could mean cool pushed artifacts/equipment later on if it's ongoing.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 22:59
|
|
|
Look, I bounced your target so your spell fizzles. Why is that so hard to understand!?quote:Coloured artifacts bring in an extra frame, and they don't use them all the time (I think it was because they want to keep artifacts more different from enchantments?). Also, If you're running an artifact that costs WW, then you can run Path in modern and you don't have to worry about your manabase. If you're running one that costs two colourless then... Though I guess they don't really design with modern in mind, it's interesting. odiv fucked around with this message at 23:07 on Dec 8, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
Does that have to be five distinct decks? Or just five top 8s?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
We haven't seen any non-fullart wastes yet, right? I hope they're rare and super expensive.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
So when do we start speculating on Boreal Druid? Or did I miss it?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
So colourless is not "mana of any colour", right? Like BoP can't tap for it, I'm guessing? I wonder what kind of interactions or consequences you wouldn't expect because of that. I'm thinking of stuff like: New Kozilek couldn't be cast as uncounterable with Cavern of Souls if it's one of your only two sources of colourless mana, but could be if it isn't.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2015 07:45
|
|
|
Cactrot posted:Expeditions are a huge miss for me, the absurd rarity ensures that if I open any shiny rare land I'll most likely convert it into multiple non-shiny ones rather than holding onto it. Yeah, I draft way too little to ever hope to open one of these. And then if you happen to open one online while spending the same amount of cash then woohoo, I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Also the aura from the last round that your opponent accidentally took.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
The Canadian dollar is almost down to 70 cents American. Using all of my money to buy singles was apparently a good investment. Seriously considering picking up the foil Lili down at the LGS now. The price sticker hasn't changed in months while our dollar has been falling.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2015 19:12
|
|
|
Just watch the antisemitism.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2015 23:28
|
|
|
I wish wotc would trademark asscrack and then start issuing bans for any leakers.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:There was someone in this thread whose friend is a judge who got banned for tweeting about the spoilers after reading about it in this very thread. If you look up the actual quote it says he tweeted them after they were in this thread. It doesn't say he got them from here.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 20:44
|
|
|
So what is the likelyhood/upshot of someone like SCG running an unsanctioned event if they can't find a judge for a region? Is that just a non-starter?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
Just sue for breach of contract then, right?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
Chill la Chill posted:Now is a great time to get into force of will which p much plays the same but is improved. Before all your cardboard is worthless. I don't even need to look at the username any more.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 21:37
|
|
|
Are many eternal decks even capable of making colorless mana for Contortion? The duals that do aren't fetchable.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
Can't wait to play this game 1 in limited and then have my opponent holding extra cards all game 2 just in case.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
Hopefully it's just a lovely picture?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
Should have been discard 2 unless you discard a planeswalker card.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 17:44
|
|
|
That's a great resolution. I think I'll join you.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 1, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
No kidding. Non-exciting, utility potential 4-of at rare. For flavour reasons.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:LOL @ 5 dollar Relic of Progenitus. drat, I think I have a foil around here somewhere. Time to dig through my stuff. Then again, I can just hold on to everything forever and then sell them for my retirement. Bubbles never burst, right? All this mtgfinance poo poo is really making me wish I had finished my cube and modern deck a lot sooner.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
Lancelot posted:A standard deck which starts with: Too affordable. The Retreat is uncommon.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 17:17
|
|
|
I'm hoping for some sort of Abzan CoCo deck with the Displacer. Strangler seems good in it. (Yes I realize you can't process in the middle of Displacer's ability)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
Just couldn't be legendary, could it?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 18:03
|
|
|
Have we seen anything with a casting/activation cost with C and another colour? We've seen them split like W in the casting cost of Displacer and C in the activation cost. But I don't think we've seen anything like WC yet?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 18:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 09:18 |
|
|
rabidsquid posted:People always say this but then all of these definitely not speculated on cards never show up being played by people. Especially not in the numbers that are suggested by the price increase  So I can't cast Ghostfire with Corrupted Crossroads for red yet, right? Hopefully they errata that soon.(oh wait, looks like they won't: http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/130173159803/why-not-simply-reprint-ghostfire-with-devoid)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 21:05
|
|