|
Mitt Romney posted:This is the author of that "report". That $100 billion would be better spent figuring out what the hell is wrong with his face.
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2015 13:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 07:53 |
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:laughing all the way to the ovens, baby! The Day the Clown Cried, only in real life.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2015 15:21
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Wouldn't they be more afraid of Obama droning them without due process? Man you are so pissed that someone actively engaged in war with the United States of America was killed in the process of said war.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:If the FBI cannot even determine if a Pakistani immigrant who married a US citizen and operated an IED factory out of her residence in California had ties to terrorism after she commits a mass casual attack against a soft government target, how can we trust the vetting process for Syrian refugees? Because nothing Syrian refugees could do would be worse than your posting.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
Your Dunkle Sans posted:responsibleandmaturegunownership.png Let's be honest here; he poked holes in it with a pen.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
How credible of a newspaper is La Stampa?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:Gravity: Doesn't exist. If items of mass had any impact of others, then mountains should have people orbiting them. Or the space shuttle in space should have the astronauts orbiting it. Of course, that's just the tip of the gravity myth. Think about it. Scientists want us to believe that the sun has a gravitation pull strong enough to keep a planet like neptune or pluto in orbit, but then it's not strong enough to keep the moon in orbit? Why is that? What I believe is going on here is this: These objects in space have yet to receive mans touch, and thus have no sin to weigh them down. This isn't the case for earth, where we see the impact of transfered sin to material objects. The more sin, the heavier something is. So does this mean that the moon landings didn't happen or that we only sent saints up?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
computer parts posted:I wonder why 25% of the people polled made over $100,000/year. How else were they going to get a headline?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2015 23:46
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:How much land has ISIL lost in Nigeria recently? How much land has Daesh had in Nigeria?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:I'm guessing the poo poo that would go down with a republican president post-Obama would make Bush's executive action look tame in comparison. Yeah, it sure is horrible how Obama established a precedent for executive overreach, something that had never before occurred in the nation's history. Alas, if it hadn't been for Obama, no future Republican President would ever have gotten the idea to do something outside the bounds of the office. The Larch fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Dec 22, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Oh so Obama meant to drop much needed supplies on his own citizens instead of drone missiles. Man, if Obama killing one American citizen actively engaged in war against the United States makes you this angry, wait until you learn about this guy named Abraham Lincoln.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:This is from a few pages back... That's why we need to abolish all child labor laws, obviously.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2015 14:27
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:^Not to mention everyone with debt gets utterly boned, and what's left of our manufacturing base would get shelled. You can substitute "everyone with debt" with "anyone who isn't rich as gently caress", honestly.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2015 14:59
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Inflation is bad, deflation is bad, we just need to stay right here and never change anything. Debt jubilees coupled with deflation could be good for the economy. Moderate inflation is a good thing.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2015 14:59
|
|
|
berzerker posted:He believes in the economic theory in the textbooks he likes. Meanwhile he doesn't believe in the also-widely-accepted economic theory of other leading economists with huge amounts of power and authority in our culture. Out of curiosity, what are the widely-accepted economic theories Krugman doesn't believe in, and who are the leading economists who promote it?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:Supply side theorists, austerity pushers, disciplines of the University of Chicago style neo-liberalist economics, etc. I wouldn't call supply-side "widely accepted", unless we're talking about people who aren't economists here.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 26, 2015 14:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 07:53 |
|
|
joeburz posted:if that was true no one would watch baseball, and i say this as a baseball fan. A baseball game cannot end with a score of zero to zero, putting it ahead of soccer in the "things happening" department.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2015 23:49
|
|