|
Could I have the Honolulu please.
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2015 00:04
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 05:38 |
|
|
CannonFodder posted:The Navy should use their own resources to defend their assets, it makes perfect logical sense. The IJN is clearly incapable of safely transporting IJA troops. The IJA must requisition troop transports and escorts under IJA command posthaste to ensure that the invasion timetable continues on schedule!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2015 06:39
|
|
|
Splode posted:curse you tiny phone screen! To your credit, Grey's commentary misled you!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
I see that the allied subs have realized their torpedoes are worthless and are taking to deck guns like the should.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 21, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
A White Guy posted:What's up with battle reports that indicate the sub captain shooting like 70 rounds into an xAK? I know! It's amazing what you can sink with just 70 .50 cal rounds i81icu812 fucked around with this message at 03:33 on Jan 21, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Jan 21, 2016 03:29
|
|
|
If you're too high to see results, you are also too high to see your target! You kinda want to see your target so you can aim.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
So how many op losses have you taken in return for 5 casualties bombing the jungle in Bataan?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2016 05:14
|
|
|
what happens if you land in LA? Do you really destroy all the airplane factories?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 25, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
Siam and Xi'an are slightly different places...
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
Grumio posted:What's your goal in invading midway? Draw out the enemy carriers? Any airbase you try and set up is going to be leveled by B-17s from Hawaii obvious solution to that is to invade hawaii
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2016 03:09
|
|
|
umm, did the brits sneak around you and retake Cox's Bazaar?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2016 05:25
|
|
|
3 DONG HORSE posted:I think the game is bugged again. It obviously thinks the CVE Long Island is Eniwetok Capable, Valuable, Extremely-durable?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
isnt all of china out of supply due to the siege in Chongqing or wherever the capital is?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
Damage from a torp + systems damage from limping from hex to hex with zero fuel is enough to sink a carrier. In theory anyway. i81icu812 fucked around with this message at 07:36 on Nov 25, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
Grey Hunter posted:
what happened to the fixed graphs?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
How many Christmas Islands are there?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 20, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
The Lurline sunk? Who's going to cruise to Hawaii now? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gbEAbhSJtg
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
mllaneza posted:The Lurline had a hell of a career. There's a story that her radio operator picked up signals from Kido Butai during the approach to Pearl Harbor. She was also the ship that picked up the American diplomatic corps from Japan after war was declared. She pops up all over the place during the war if you look at which troop transports participated in any given operation. She also was the pride of the Matson line and the primary way anyone got to Hawaii prior to airlines. A heck of a career.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2017 01:44
|
|
|
Triggerhappypilot posted:How in the hell did the Allies manage to land 40,000 men on New Caledonia without us noticing? Wtf 40k is kinda a lot guys
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2017 03:01
|
|
|
Lakedaimon posted:The Italians had higher velocity guns than most navies, providing more penetration at the cost of barrel wear and possibly some salvo dispersion, although that may have been from sloppy tolerances from the shell manufacturers. French had some very high speed Destroyers like the Le Fantasque. And because im weird I also find it interesting that they used a substance called Black Mousse to fill the voids in some of their ships to keep out water. Only problem is that if it became soaked with oil from leaking/damaged tanks, you then had a flammable substance squirreled away in parts of the ship that were difficult or impossible to reach. French ships were the best. All guns forward at all times.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2017 06:55
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Finally see the Honolulu and she sinks immediately. Can I have the Raleigh as my next lucky ship? Might as well see how many lucky ships I can get sunk.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 19:07
|
|
i81icu812
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Uh... should I flip a coin to pick? I think Wichita is reported sunk, so Raleigh it is
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Velius posted:Honolulu and St Louis are modern CLs, better than anything the Japanese get except for the Mogami in its CL configuration. That's a really good pair of ships to sink. Yeah, its really odd that they're worth so few points
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, and North Carolina are sunk. didnt gh cancel a bunch of ships?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Maybe? I thought he wasn't this time around. Three carriers for 1945 are cancelled. I doubt I will need them, and they are to far off to see any real action. The Junyo is accelerated, another fleet carrier in the next few months will be useful.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2017 04:38
|
|
|
jaegerx posted:Holy poo poo. They had to refuel the When operating at sea the ship was refueled every three days, burning approximately 100,000 gallons of oil a day Wow.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
All of those targets and no confirmed kills?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2017 08:15
|
|
|
Wtf, wrong CL. You can't let all those ships escape!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 00:51
|
|
|
Thats a big bunch of ships with no escorts. I seem to have picked my lucky ship poorly. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
i81icu812 posted:I think Wichita is reported sunk, so Raleigh it is  2/2 on lucky ship kills Hmm, now what to pick...
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Okay, give me the La Brea as lucky ship number 3. I've got a feeling about this one!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 13, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Value to Japan - 125 (Base 25) Are you doubting the veracity of Japanese reporting?!?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 13, 2017 06:09
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Good job closing the Burma road! isnt this opening the burma road, since now Japan controls the entire length?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2017 00:16
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:In terms of historical talk or direct references, "closing" the Burma Road is what its referred to when the Japanese control it since it's primarily seen as a supply line to China, and not as a supply line out of it for the Japanese. Japan closes the road by taking any part of it and breaking the supply link Allies can open the road by retaking removing Japanese control of any of the segments Grey has literally walked troops from China all the way to Burma and supply is free to move along the entire road for the glory of the empire! Of course none of the Japanese armies in China or Burma have any supply so it's moot i81icu812 fucked around with this message at 06:58 on Mar 24, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2017 04:57
|
|
|
Saint Celestine posted:At this rate? No he wont. He needs planes to delay the capture of SE Asia for as long as possible. At this rate, he's gonna need any planes at all!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2017 17:32
|
|
|
CannonFodder posted:Tankers come in all sizes in this game an just get the designation TK. Looking at the combat screen, the Santa Maria is larger than the DDs torpedoing it, and almost as large as the BB. And then there's the other TK, Isis, which looks like a converted AK. Yeah, looks like a T2-SE-A2 tanker. General characteristics Displacement: 21,880 tons full 5,532 tons light Length: 524 ft (160 m) Beam: 68 ft (21 m) Draft: 30 ft (9.1 m) Propulsion: Turbo-electric, single screw, 6,000 hp (4,500 kW) Speed: 16.5 knots (31 km/h; 19 mph) Complement: 52 mariners A huge tanker.
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 06:22
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:He can totally take Darwin if he just lands one hex away from it though, landing directly in the city is pretty much the only thing that killed him last time. You're no fun.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
Okay, it's almost that time again. Someone fix the graphs before the month ends.
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Someone got a link to the spreadsheet? Anyone?
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2017 10:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 05:38 |
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Thanks. It was one dissenting person! Chaotic Neutral posted:The red/blue graph was an improvement in theory, but the decision to fade the AI instead of fading the historical values kinda sabotaged its readability, and it could have used a finer resolution on the grid lines. Yeah, go back to the red and blue color scheme, fix the labels and fade the historical values NOT the AI values and everything is good.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2017 08:39
|
|