|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I feel like Hackenberg might actually succeed if only because he is definitely not starter material. The NFL has a bad habit right now of burning through rookie QBs and putting too much pressure on them. Hackenberg could ride the bench for a few seasons and turn a respectable Brock Osweiler performance in the end. Serious question: when is the last time a QB who played dumb as poo poo in college became a good NFL player? Because when I saw Hackenberg he looked football stupid.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 16:02 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 16:32 |
|
Ty1990 posted:Tonight Hack played 3+ quarters and went 11-31 for 54 yards, no touchdowns and a pick six. Somehow even that stat line doesn't accurately describe how loving terrible he looked. Almost twice as many interception return yards as passing yards!
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2016 17:56 |
|
Locker is a good parallel except Hack seems even worse. Put another way, a career 79.0 passer rating looks wildly optimistic for Hack right now, and that's where Locker ended up. Both guys had eerily similar (bad) college stats: code:
code:
e: College rating is totally different from NFL passer rating by the way.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2016 20:18 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:TFF: Preseason doesn't matter His entire preseason has been garbage and his college career was trash too. It's not just one thing, even though 1.7 YPA is almost impossibly awful.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2016 20:29 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:hey everybody has a bad game let him out there under the big lights when it counts I want to see this too, because I want to see if there is a circle of QB hell below "butt fumble."
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2016 20:38 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 16:32 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Someone save this quote for when Pats fans are begging for Hack on their team Après Brady le déluge is kind of a given. I for one am hoping that it's at least a spectacular catastrophe.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2016 20:44 |