|
Freedom from Muslims now! However did they infiltrate our defence forces?!?!?! Flee! FLEE!
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 10:42 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:30 |
|
It's printed by a printing shop I walk past every day in Milton, Brisbane. QLD.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 11:34 |
|
Anidav posted:It's printed by a printing shop I walk past every day in Milton, Brisbane. QLD. So are you happy with the quality of your order? Colours all good? Happy with the font?
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 11:45 |
|
Graic Gabtar posted:So are you happy with the quality of your order? You cut the lines about us being anonymous and legion, you hack.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 12:02 |
|
Graic Gabtar posted:So are you happy with the quality of your order? Figured you worked there, patriot.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 12:54 |
|
Operation Rolling Thunder is now being applied over Melbourne. It has been a while since I've heard bursts of thunder lasting for greater than 5 seconds, some even 10, it's quite surreal. I'm so glad I stayed home to research and drink rather than meet up for a late-night motorbike ride.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 13:24 |
|
Redcordial posted:Operation Rolling Thunder is now being applied over Melbourne. It has been a while since I've heard bursts of thunder lasting for greater than 5 seconds, some even 10, it's quite surreal. I just drove across town through it. Heaviest rains I've been stuck in for a bit. Made it safely to the annoyance of many of you.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 13:36 |
|
Graic Gabtar posted:I just drove across town through it. Heaviest rains I've been stuck in for a bit. It was quite heavy wasn't it, my driveway even became an inch high and three metre wide stream of gushing water. I've also been meaning to say something to you regarding you announcing some of your personal info in the recent past. I want to apologise for being so harsh in the past to some of my replies to various posts you had made, mostly pertaining to the treatment of asylum seekers and refugees. The various calls for you to gently caress off etc were instantly recognized as a hasty and stupid move on my part when you disclosed some of the things you have faced and continue to face. I hope you have a good night and rest of your weekend man, I appreciate your more open-minded contributions and will remember not to be so hasty in my agitation.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 14:26 |
|
Redcordial posted:It was quite heavy wasn't it, my driveway even became an inch high and three metre wide stream of gushing water. Actually, you are wrong and Ciarg should gently caress off
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 14:35 |
|
Please don't interrupt my rare moment of kindness to strangers who have often exclaimed abhorrent views towards completely innocent people. Or maybe do, we can have both of such things in this sophisticated world, can't we so?
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 15:19 |
|
Redcordial posted:It was quite heavy wasn't it, my driveway even became an inch high and three metre wide stream of gushing water. Thank you for your kind words. Unexpected I'll admit, but appreciated. Don't feel bad about yourself in any way for how you have spoken to me previously. I have had a few interesting things said to me here, but by and large this has only been in response to my own poo poo posting. There's no doubt I've said things over the months that some people have found offensive. Its clear to me now that I wasn't paying the people of the 'echo chamber' the respect they deserved. I regret that I would have had a much better time of it had chosen to listen for a much longer time before I spoke. Then doubling down and not caring if I was 'poking the bear'. Probably, not a smart move in a room where most people are many times more clued into the topic at hand than you. So what started as drive by trolling became a very interesting experience. I've learned a lot about how people see Australia through different eyes. That itself was worth the price of admission. That being said though, It's a shame I haven't been that good at explaining how I see some of our more contentious issues. Argumentative writing is not my strong suit. I think one valid criticism I have of this place is than any discussion has battle lines immediately drawn of being right, or being racist. I dont believe this always creates a great atmosphere for people to always be constructive in what they say. This has turned out to be a response to everyone I think! As for my own personal demons? Don't worry about that. I know hearing about it would bring joy to some people here second only to seeing be stabbed in the face but it's been the normal for so long I just roll with it. Fortunately for me the coin fell so that I have to be reeled in more than picked up so I guess you could call that luck. Jonah Galtberg posted:Actually, you are wrong and Ciarg should gently caress off You wish will very soon be coming true.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 16:12 |
|
Redcordial posted:It was quite heavy wasn't it, my driveway even became an inch high and three metre wide stream of gushing water. What things have they faced and continue to face that excuse or explain their disgusting opinions on asylum seekers ?
|
# ? Jan 30, 2016 23:37 |
|
katlington posted:What things have they faced and continue to face that excuse or explain their disgusting opinions on asylum seekers ? let's not pry into someone's private life because of their political opinions expressed on the something awful forums, please
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 00:00 |
|
katlington posted:What things have they faced and continue to face that excuse or explain their disgusting opinions on asylum seekers ? your face
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 00:14 |
|
Jaycar has offered to buy all Dick Smith Electronics retail store spaces.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 00:55 |
|
Ackerman today:
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 02:04 |
|
Miranda Devinequote:A CURIOUS aspect of the Australian of the Year award is that three of the eight finalists were involved in one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in Australian military history.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 02:10 |
|
adamantium|wang posted:Ackerman today: The full article quote:WITHOUT doubt last week’s Australian of the Year was the most mismanaged and divisive event since former Prime Minister Julia Gillard was dragged out of a Canberra restaurant in 2012 by federal police, losing her shoe as she fled a group of Aboriginal protesters who had been urged to stage a demonstration by a member of her own staff. Video of that farce went viral within seconds.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 02:22 |
|
BBJoey posted:let's not pry into someone's private life because of their political opinions expressed on the something awful forums, please Redcordial posted:
SMILLENNIALSMILLEN fucked around with this message at 02:41 on Jan 31, 2016 |
# ? Jan 31, 2016 02:28 |
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 03:23 |
|
It's pretty hard for me to read Devine and Ackerman, especially the way I am right now, but am I right in thinking that they unleashed on Morrison on the same non-issue? In other news, tried to find out why ScreamingLlama got probied and discovered they speak a strange language in the Eve thread.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 03:23 |
|
Boys will
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 03:28 |
|
Starshark posted:It's pretty hard for me to read Devine and Ackerman, especially the way I am right now, but am I right in thinking that they unleashed on Morrison on the same non-issue? The most important part of the culture war is unity.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 03:52 |
|
katlington posted:Hardly sounds like prying. It was public information provided at a particular point in time, you thick gently caress. If you actually had a sense of positioning and memory you would know it was earlier this month you brain dead slug. And no, I will not repeat personal information that someone had shared in good confidence, even though it was shared publicly, I am not going to do your loving work for you.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 04:06 |
|
Starshark posted:It's pretty hard for me to read Devine and Ackerman, especially the way I am right now, but am I right in thinking that they unleashed on Morrison on the same non-issue? Devine is an apologist for sexual harrassment in the workplace, and minimising the impact that sexual harrassment has on not only the victims, but the reputation of the ADF. She attempts to shore up the shakiest argument with the classic "while soldiers were dying", which while true, doesn't count for poo poo because not addressing this issue wouldn't have saved soldiers from dying. The message sent by Defence was clear one, which is that sexual harrassment and objectification of women was not going to be tolerated. But won't someone think of the men, who were the real victims Ackerman's piece presents a view which is so backwards we could use carbon dating on it to figure which prehistoric age it was dug up from. It's dangerous because the person/people it targets (transgender people) already suffer from a large amount of discrimination and misunderstanding, and this article does not help anyone who is a transgender be accepted. Phrases such as "the homosexual community's" really presents a "us vs them" mentality and reinforces the stereotype that trans people are these weird, hosed up, and wrong individuals. Unsurprisingly, it is exactly this view which causes trans people to commit suicide. Devine's piece is poo poo, whereas Ackerman's article loving sucks rear end and is wrong regarding the universally accepted definitions for gender. It's so disgusting I don't even know where to begin, I could write an essay about it but just goddamn
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 04:06 |
|
I mean we could go back a few years and be like "Hmm, women don't deserve rights or a vote, it's scientifically proven that they have smaller brains" or "heh, black people are objectively biologically inferior to us, as well as being less cultured". The only thing that's changed is a few words
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 04:08 |
|
Recoome posted:
I agree with your views towards both Devine and Ackerman, and also agree that Ackerman's position is a much more aggressively positioned one which seems to only have been written to incite hatred in my opinion.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 04:10 |
|
Redcordial posted:I agree with your views towards both Devine and Ackerman, and also agree that Ackerman's position is a much more aggressively positioned one which seems to only have been written to incite hatred in my opinion. Yeah, I didn't want to cross that rubicon when I wrote my assessment on it. My assessment was that Ackerman has a bone to pick with transgender people and the accursed "PC" crowd, with Cate McGregor providing a useful platform to achieve this. I say this because a large part of the article is devoted to undermining the legitimacy of trans gender identity, rather than an opinion about how McGregor very poorly handled not winning that dumb award. I think she hosed up by doing what she did, but lets not go full loving transphobic here guys
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 04:18 |
|
Redcordial posted:It was public information provided at a particular point in time, you thick gently caress. If you actually had a sense of positioning and memory you would know it was earlier this month you brain dead slug. I haven't read every post in this thread. You can just link posts, it's easy. Why are you so angry? SMILLENNIALSMILLEN fucked around with this message at 04:37 on Jan 31, 2016 |
# ? Jan 31, 2016 04:32 |
|
This is AusPol if you aren't posting at obvious 'lost the plot' angry levels you clearly don't care enough and shouldn't be sullying our pristine thread with your milquetoast postings. Hmmmm toast. Is anyone angry enough to tell me what Jay Weathrill's story is? On the one hand he is white anting Labour. On the other he is white anting Labour. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-29/jay-weatherill-budget-swipe-labor-and-liberals/7123330?section=sa
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 05:16 |
|
Recoome posted:Devine is an apologist for sexual harrassment in the workplace, and minimising the impact that sexual harrassment has on not only the victims, but the reputation of the ADF. She attempts to shore up the shakiest argument with the classic "while soldiers were dying", which while true, doesn't count for poo poo because not addressing this issue wouldn't have saved soldiers from dying. The message sent by Defence was clear one, which is that sexual harrassment and objectification of women was not going to be tolerated. But won't someone think of the men, who were the real victims We just need to ask ourselves whether we want to end up like the US where "25% of military women have been sexually assaulted, and up to 80% have been sexually harassed". quote:Devine's piece is poo poo, whereas Ackerman's article loving sucks rear end and is wrong regarding the universally accepted definitions for gender. It's so disgusting I don't even know where to begin, I could write an essay about it but just goddamn It also completely ignores anyone with Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome and a bunch of others.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 05:20 |
Cartoon posted:This is AusPol if you aren't posting at obvious 'lost the plot' angry levels you clearly don't care enough and shouldn't be sullying our pristine thread with your milquetoast postings. Hmmmm toast. As far as I can tell, he is a member of the ALP, which has a rich history of white anting itself.
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 05:34 |
|
"Hey mate what's up, last week you hated them now you say they're alright?" "How dare you want an informed opinion! You big idiot! How dare you want to know why I, who had an opinion like you, changed it so dramatically! I won't do your work for you! gently caress! I would never violate a persons privacy by linking their posts from earlier in the thread! gently caress! gently caress gently caress!"
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 05:48 |
|
Jay Weatherall is playing state politics, something he seems to be quite good at. Devine does her "all other women are competition therefore feminism is wrong, hello boys" thing again, and Ackerman is a disgusting gently caress who is probably overcompensating because that's some projection going on there. Sorry, not angry enough today.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 06:03 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:We just need to ask ourselves whether we want to end up like the US where "25% of military women have been sexually assaulted, and up to 80% have been sexually harassed". Oh but you see soldiers dying, also feminism bad And yeah, there's a reason why purely relying on chromosomes to determine gender is horribly outdated (over 100 something years ago)
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 06:39 |
|
Recoome posted:Ackerman's piece presents a view which is so backwards we could use carbon dating on it to figure which prehistoric age it was dug up from. It's dangerous because the person/people it targets (transgender people) already suffer from a large amount of discrimination and misunderstanding, and this article does not help anyone who is a transgender be accepted. Phrases such as "the homosexual community's" really presents a "us vs them" mentality and reinforces the stereotype that trans people are these weird, hosed up, and wrong individuals. Unsurprisingly, it is exactly this view which causes trans people to commit suicide. Just a friendly tip, don't use this phrasing next time, drop the a or change it to transgender person. Transgender is often seen as offensive when it's used as a noun rather than an adjective.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 08:00 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:It also completely ignores anyone with Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome and a bunch of others. Look mate I did biology in high school for a semester so I know literally everything there is to know about gender and identity.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 08:08 |
|
Sorry about it being a few pages back:Graic Gabtar posted:Really? They have to re-order the text in that policy. Regardless, we're still going to have Lucas Heights for some time yet. This is what I am attempting to do - and yes, we probably are. That's what I want the policy to recognise. Friends of the Earth act like we could close it now, that's ludicrous, and I am using the democratic means at my disposal to change the policy. It's going quite successfully. Graic Gabtar posted:Makes sense. Does this include just Lucas Heights or all the other sources that crop us as well? I'm assuming it would. Also, is it the policy though? Does it have to be voted for or can Di Natale just make it so? In this case it's a state- and local-level initiative, RDN doesn't look into it. Since it's proposed to be stored at ANSTO, it's the Sutherland Greens who have carriage over what happens. Also, RDN can't make anything so - not without violating internal party processes. The most liberty the leader has is what stuff is focused on and what isn't for elections. Graic Gabtar posted:Well, we do export quite a bit of Uranium. You could argue we should have more of a role in a solution as we've contributed to a bit of the problem. The genie is out of the bottle. You can't un-mine it. All the more reason to stop mining it. But yes, I could agree here, and if shipments are returned to us we can discuss it. Graic Gabtar posted:Where do The Greens stand on where it should be stored? The country where it was used or whoever puts their hand up for the cash? We have a very geological stable continent. Sounds like some serious coin could be made to fund our own renewable energy program. We want what's coming in currently stored at ANSTO, where it can be overseen and protected. What's a cop-out is expecting to just dump it on Aboriginal tribal lands in exchange for payments they should be getting anyway. Quantum Mechanic fucked around with this message at 08:23 on Jan 31, 2016 |
# ? Jan 31, 2016 08:20 |
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 08:35 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:30 |
|
Problematic.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2016 08:37 |