|
Recoome posted:i cannot believe that Chris "dogfucker" Kenny, known fucker of dogs, has carnal knowledge of an animal of the canine variety now come on, that is not the allegation. is it really such a big deal that chris kenny complimented a dog on its looks, put his arm around it, gave it a kiss on the cheek, slowly began to undress etc. etc.? do we really live in a day and age where reporters can't enjoy some quality one-on-one time with a lovely dog in an informal setting? photographs of the alleged incident show the dog looking perfectly at ease with chris kenny's presence.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2016 06:03 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 01:21 |
|
Birb Katter posted:So Dutton went to send "mad loving witch" about Samantha Maidens Briggs bit to Briggs but sent it to Maiden instead. Dutton is getting lightly smoked on the front page of the tele this is the man with the final say as to whether refugees are allowed into the country.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 13:04 |
|
oh no not this again
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2016 13:43 |
|
Laserface posted:Theres numerous examples of the roles being reversed and no one batting an eye. won't someone think of the men!!
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2016 10:21 |
|
hooman posted:Power disbalances between sexes create a situation in where men feel free to me more sexually aggressive towards women. he's arguing
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2016 12:52 |
|
EvilElmo posted:Greens selling out their core values to expand their vote to the wider public? That'd never happen! hey dude how goes the change from within
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 03:38 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:The operative phrase in my post was "dismissed out of hand," I.e. because "nukes are scary" or some such bollocks, rather than an actual reasoned argument. good thing the greens have a very strongly reasoned argument against nuclear power, then. glad we're in agreement
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 05:49 |
|
Tokamak posted:'could' is the operative word here. What we end up with is WA recommissioning a coal plant for 250 million. and so the solution is building a multi-billion dollar nuclear reactor instead?
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 07:25 |
|
I think he was asking about your"Kind of makes the Greens leap of faith future technology argument look like the equivalent of 'clean coal'. A bit lame to be honest." statement, which I too do not understand. There's no future technology involved - currently, considering the cost and time it takes to build a nuclear power plant, renewables are a much more cost-effective and realistic proposal than creating an Australian nuclear power industry from scratch. If you're using Lucas Heights as an example of how Australia could jump to nuclear power you've missed that the HIFAR is a medical reactor which is much less complicated than a full-fledged powerplant.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 07:40 |
|
Orkin Mang posted:haha ok bbjoey.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 07:44 |
|
Graic Gabtar posted:I think you misunderstand me. I was referring to the Greens policy on nuclear medicine. Oh, I didn't realise that. That's loving dumb. I'm not a member of the Greens, but those goons who are, have you considered raising this at a meeting or whatever?
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 08:34 |
|
Tokamak posted:No, but the problem still remains that a confluence of events led to the recommissioning of a coal plant. I'm not sure that there's a disconnect in what the Greens are saying. As far as I understand it, they're arguing that if there was a will to make a concerted effort to move away from coal, renewable technology is sufficiently developed these days that a solid, workable plan could be put in place to get to 100% renewable energy within two decades, with no need for any intermediate steps, be they clean coal, nuclear energy, whatever. Obviously, this will doesn't exist at a political level, thanks to the LNP being coal fetishists and the ALP being themselves, so when the question of power is raised the answer is immediately "coal" with no consideration of alternatives. These aren't pie in the sky plans - they're plans which, if the Greens suddenly came to power tomorrow, could be implemented immediately. The problem as ever is that the Greens are only a minority party and so all they can do is lobby their ideas and hope that people listen.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 11:41 |
|
PaletteSwappedNinja posted:Let's murder him haha haha yeah let's WhiskeyWhiskers posted:You know what's a bit scary. I legitimately had no idea who you were talking about for a good 20 seconds.
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2016 08:06 |
|
agreed
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2016 08:43 |
|
tithin posted:Almost certainly. Even if he didn't authorise it directly, as Cardinal / former Archbishop, he would have been aware of it. that's some loving avatar
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 12:24 |
|
what does american nonsense have to do with sausage sandwiches
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2016 13:48 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:You get to keep your family photos, your wedding band and up to $2000, the rest will be confiscated. I can't even begin to comprehend how disgusting this is and await the LNP instituting it forthwith. Periphery posted:I'd actually like to see a party that's essentially the greens but instead of being branded as environmentalists heavily pushes a brand focused on health, education and public infrastructure. While those are some fairly prominent areas in all parties I think a focus on those would still allow a party to differentiate itself from the other parties while providing shitloads of avenues to criticise the status quo.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2016 09:22 |
|
asio posted:Nah, the alp was just protectionism and exclusion of asiatics. Everything else was trying to get themselves rich enough to be real tories. I dunno, Gough-era ALP seemed fairly progressive for its time, though it was quite a brief period between racist protectionists and neoliberal tory-lites.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2016 23:46 |
|
asio posted:"Vietnamese balts" + east timor yeah I'm just trying to conjure up a past I can be nostalgic for
|
# ¿ Jan 14, 2016 00:19 |
|
quote:"...especially when the Greens have similar views to the Liberal Party on penalty rates."
|
# ¿ Jan 14, 2016 04:03 |
|
Recoome posted:Honestly I had to google humanities, I wasn't super sure what they even did
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2016 03:55 |
|
If you guys despise Amethyst that much you should probably just put him on ignore instead of attempting to savagely burn him with insults like "use big words, much? "
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 00:38 |
|
So dead the last post two posts about it were 5 and 10 posts ago respectively
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 00:43 |
|
Cartoon posted:I think you're mistaken about that now. Please do not bring up my numerical illiteracy I am very sensitive about it.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 00:50 |
|
Wait, do people actually use the term "SJW" unironically even when their real name is attached?
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 03:32 |
|
Graic Gabtar posted:Forgive me (and probably others) for just deciding to tuning out of the whole issue is easier than than the risk of being painted as a racist. If you're just tuning out entirely, why did you comment that the speech was lacking in consensus-building?
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2016 15:06 |
|
aren't the unions knifing the entire ALP in the back and supporting the greens?
|
# ¿ Jan 28, 2016 23:59 |
|
the ALP doesn't have a supportive media empire ready to wholeheartedly accept and defend any excuse they make, though.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 01:18 |
|
Graic Gabtar posted:You know I'm going to say it don't you? no, am I about to be owned (moreso than usual)?
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 02:30 |
|
god I wish the ABC was half as partisan against the LNP as they make it out to be.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 03:13 |
|
SadisTech posted:Mother Nature is apparently sick of our poo poo and is trying to wipe all of Australia out: I'm stuck in the Syd airport because of this and I long for death
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 06:53 |
|
katlington posted:What things have they faced and continue to face that excuse or explain their disgusting opinions on asylum seekers ? let's not pry into someone's private life because of their political opinions expressed on the something awful forums, please
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2016 00:00 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:It also completely ignores anyone with Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome and a bunch of others. Look mate I did biology in high school for a semester so I know literally everything there is to know about gender and identity.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2016 08:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 01:21 |
|
Freudian Slip posted:What and then they wonder why nobody wants to gently caress them
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2016 07:06 |