Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Peel posted:

it's kind of understandable since i have seen a couple of extreme indigenous activist types get really squirmy and self-righteously evasive when asked what their rhetoric about land means in practice, but i didn't find sakai much like them and enough of his actual words have been posted itt that i think people should put up some actual textual evidence if they're going to claim he's a cryptogenocidaire or whatever
it implicit, not explicit, and follows from his essentialist logic of a) whiteness is an inherent part of capitalist exploitation b) whites will never achieve solidarity with non-whites.

he's constantly coy about what exactly he believes, but it's there, and his entire presentation is constructed to get the reader to come to these conclusions - and it's worked in the case of pener, homeex & others, obviously.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

Yossarian-22 posted:

rudatron and pener are the worst american chopper meme iteration yet

which one of them strips completely naked to fight the other

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
I used prolix as a scrabble word once with the triple letter score on the X and owned my family on vacation

Rated PG-34
Jul 1, 2004




GalacticAcid posted:

I used prolix as a scrabble word once with the triple letter score on the X and owned my family on vacation

who says being an internet armchair leftist is useless

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
this was long before my posting days, not sure where I picked it up. Probably some terrible opinion writer in the Post-Gazette.

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

rudatron posted:

it implicit, not explicit, and follows from his essentialist logic of a) whiteness is an inherent part of capitalist exploitation b) whites will never achieve solidarity with non-whites.

he's constantly coy about what exactly he believes, but it's there, and his entire presentation is constructed to get the reader to come to these conclusions - and it's worked in the case of pener, homeex & others, obviously.

it doesn't essentially lead there. it could just as easily lead to a country which, for example, followed the mold of soviet nationalities policy with federalized regions for ethnic minorities under the umbrella of a larger union. but i'm sure you'd dismiss this as the creation of "ethnostates" because you don't know what you're talking about on most subjects and find purchase among people easily hoodwinked by long posts and a pathological distaste for "identity politics"

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
hmm yes, 'separate but equal' is a sustainable model, and the USSR + yugoslavia didn't immediately break up into squabbling children who all hate each other.

all of which is irrelevant to sakai who calls for 'desettlerization', not federationism.

Rhukatah
Feb 26, 2013

by Nyc_Tattoo

Yossarian-22 posted:

rudatron and pener are the worst american chopper meme iteration yet

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

rudatron posted:

hmm yes, 'separate but equal' is a sustainable model, and the USSR + yugoslavia didn't immediately break up into squabbling children who all hate each other.

all of which is irrelevant to sakai who calls for 'desettlerization', not federationism.

nationalities policy was within the soviet union, not applied to the eastern bloc. wow, what a surprise you can't draw this basic distinction!

Goon Danton
May 24, 2012

Don't forget to show my shitposts to the people. They're well worth seeing.

Is Settlers prolix? Asking for a friend.

THS
Sep 15, 2017

i just think communism is a good idea

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Market socialism guys, look that poo poo up

THS
Sep 15, 2017

Karl Barks posted:

Market socialism guys, look that poo poo up

rick (from RIck and Morty): that sounds like slavery with extra steps

AnEdgelord
Dec 12, 2016

Yandat posted:

rick (from RIck and Morty): that sounds like slavery with extra steps

Its funny because that line is literally brought up when someone starts describing wage labor.

The fact that none of the rick and morty "fandom" picked up on this is reason #5489 why they all deserve the gulag.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

R. Guyovich posted:

nationalities policy was within the soviet union, not applied to the eastern bloc. wow, what a surprise you can't draw this basic distinction!
i have bad news about what happened to the soviet union.

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

rudatron posted:

i have bad news about what happened to the soviet union.

it was sabotaged by fat Arab oil barons and then a pizzahut representative came to power?

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Top City Homo posted:

it was sabotaged by fat Arab oil barons and then a pizzahut representative came to power?

The blackest reaction

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Top City Homo posted:

it was sabotaged by fat Arab oil barons and then a liberal came to power?

Fat and Arab????

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
basically anyone who argues for separatism isn't someone who is Woke, it's someone who is hiding their prejudice and narrow-mindedness behind their faux-concern for justice. It's the end result of a liberal mindset, unwilling to compromise on fetishizing/essentializing identity as a mystical force that radiates out, instead of a facade imposed through our interactions with others

to which the only logical outcome is either:

a) a completely unrealistic ideal of 'tolerance', where everyone is in a perpetual mexican stand-off with everyone else, where strict boundaries are managed, and the people who control those boundaries get to set the rules & enhance their own power (which is where media liberals see themselves) -- but in reality this is unstable outcome, that always breaks apart, into:

b) open conflict, where the other is dehumanized as a necessary piece of mental gymnastics, because There Is No Alternative.

when the liberal eventually gives up on a), they eventually embrace b), because the idea of challenging the politics of identity is, in their minds, impossible.

rudatron fucked around with this message at 05:31 on May 11, 2018

THS
Sep 15, 2017

kill the liberal in your mind

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

Karl Barks posted:

Fat and Arab????

the power of islam

oil

Jizz Festival
Oct 30, 2012
Lipstick Apathy

Karl Barks posted:

Market socialism guys, look that poo poo up

google is telling me its for lameasses? Is this true??

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUmyrmgyZvw

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

#meltdownmaydays

Peel
Dec 3, 2007

rudatron posted:

it implicit, not explicit, and follows from his essentialist logic of a) whiteness is an inherent part of capitalist exploitation b) whites will never achieve solidarity with non-whites.

alternative solution: the proletariat overthrows the capitalist class and institutes socialism. then, without the capitalist surplus extraction there's plenty for everyone and no need to keep building up white supremacy to defend the bourgeoisie, and real community can emerge. as per hexplainer's quote:

J. Sakai posted:

There is plenty of land in America. Everyone could live here who lives here, quite well, with a lot of autonomy, lot of justice, lot of room for expression and development.
'everyone' who lives in america, not nonwhites, everyone.

he talks at length in settlers about how white supremacy in the US was constituted as part of class relations which changed the character of 'white' people in the united states and (eventually via imperialism) in continental europe. implicit in this is that race relations can change again under different class relations.

if you wanted to claim that he has an excessive focus on ethnic nationalism that would, if the basis for a mass revolutionary movement, ultimately scupper the construction of socialism and probably lead to grave crimes, that's probably a defensible position. lord knows nominal socialists have had problems with unintended consequences. but you're claiming he outright desires white genocide in secret, and you haven't produced any backing for this besides a feeble inference from claims that are themselves ungrounded in his texts and contradict explicit sentiments in them.

quote:

he's constantly coy about what exactly he believes, but it's there, and his entire presentation is constructed to get the reader to come to these conclusions - and it's worked in the case of pener, homeex & others, obviously.

his entire presentation is constructed to get the reader to come to these conclusions that nobody but you thinks he holds?



here's another unfortunately long sakai text: http://kersplebedeb.com/posts/the-shock-of-recognition. it's not directly contradictory, but we've already seen the things he's said that directly contradict your claims, instead it gives more of a flavour of his actual thinking. this stuff is from the twelfth section which is most relevant here, and short enough to read:

TRENDS TOWARD UNEXPECTED FASCIST INFECTIONS? posted:

We are used to thinking of national liberation movements as being pro-freedom, of being a force for liberation. But all nationalist movements have inherently both liberating and repressive possibilities, based on different class politics within a broad mass movement. It would be a mistake, for instance, to view the historic Nation of Islam as just being around the politics of Malcolm X. He gradually became a radical anti-capitalist, as he himself said many times. He wasn’t a “Marxist” or an “anarchist” in a European ideological framework, but identified with the communal socialist ideas that had grown within many anti-colonial revolutions. Malcolm’s Black nationalism was a nationalism of the oppressed classes, which is to say it was internationalist at its heart. When he famously cried out, “The Black Revolution is sweeping Asia! The Black Revolution is sweeping Latin America! The Black Revolution is sweeping Africa!” , it was obvious that to him it wasn’t about a race or a nation but about the world’s oppressed majority. And he lived what he said. While it was the practice for the NOI to operate as a franchised business, with the local minister being given property and the right to keep all the revenues raised above the quotas assigned by Chicago, Malcolm refused to accept personal wealth.

[...]

We have to grasp the fuller pattern. These rightists were not an outright puppet for white interests such as a Clarence Thomas is (although rightwing Black nationalists publicly supported Thomas’ Supreme Court nomination in their role as a “loyal opposition”). Their class position is much more complex than that. They are bourgeois nationalists, believing in the salvation of their Race through the rise of a commanding bourgeoisie and its industries. In other words, instead of working for white corporations the Black Man should build his own, as every major capitalist nation had done. The reason that all capitalism has historically been nationalistic is that to rise from nothing, a bourgeoisie needs to start by having its very own people to exploit (how can you exploit other nations if you haven’t built some strength by sucking on your own people first?). Most importantly, you need to disempower and oppress women as a gender, to break up the communal culture that is the barrier to capitalist accumulation. And deals and cooperation with more powerful rivals are just business sense to bourgeois nationalism, as when Minister Louis Farrakhan “explained” the divine revelation that Allah chose Malcolm for death as a warning to the Black faithful not to directly oppose the u.s. government (so the f.b.i./c.i.a. and Minister Farrakhan himself get off for killing Malcolm X, while poor old Allah has to take the rap).

The defeat of New Afrikan revolutionary nationalism after the mass uprisings of the 1960s opened the way for new developments, including a nationalism dominated by rightist politics. These new authoritarian trends manifested themselves most clearly in the rise of male institutions unprecedented in the Black Nation’s history. Led by the breakout of Black women, more and more New Afrikans reject a nationalist separatism that would only produce a more repressed life than they already had under u.s. capitalism.
he seems like a pretty straightforward 'internationalist socialism via national liberation' type to me. that he thinks the white masses will not and have not, in practice, abandoned capitalism en masse and so can't be the leaders of the anti-capitalist revolution does not imply that whites need to be exterminated, it just implies that they won't be the motor of capitalism's overthrow and trying to put them in that position by e.g. subordinating black unions to white unions is a strategic error.

Peel fucked around with this message at 10:02 on May 11, 2018

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

no peel don't do it

Peel
Dec 3, 2007

sorry ill stop

Peel
Dec 3, 2007

i don't even like sakai

freckle
Apr 6, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
i'm sakai

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
The whole argument that "white" people (which means absolutely nothing to me as a finn to begin with) will not be a motor for revolution still relies on the assumption that race identity will forever persist as the defining factor that people in america use to divide themselves into opposing camps.

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

there's a difference between being a motor and being the motor. whites can be incorporated into the ranks of any revolutionary movement but it's almost certain they'll be a minority, due to all the preexisting biases and allegiances sakai lays out. this is an uncomfortable reality for the barely embryonic us left, who understand there is a diversity problem in their orgs but envisions the solution as more minority members with relatively unchanged leadership. demsoc types recognize the absurdity of the "hire more women guards" attitude from liberals but still have a problem organizing with minorities due to their own blind spots. this is a symptom of what sakai talks about, especially in the chapters on cpusa.

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

lollontee posted:

The whole argument that "white" people (which means absolutely nothing to me as a finn to begin with) will not be a motor for revolution still relies on the assumption that race identity will forever persist as the defining factor that people in america use to divide themselves into opposing camps.

your finnish people evicted the colored original inhabitants (slavs) from the country

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

lollontee posted:

The whole argument that "white" people (which means absolutely nothing to me as a finn to begin with) will not be a motor for revolution still relies on the assumption that race identity will forever persist as the defining factor that people in america use to divide themselves into opposing camps.

Lol no one cares about Finland

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES

Dreddout posted:

Lol no one cares about Finland

*Matt Bruenig begins making the Sound of Ultimate Suffering a la Cary Elwes in The Princess Bride*

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Plutonis posted:

your finnish people evicted the colored original inhabitants (slavs) from the country

Samis aren't slavs, and we just killed them until they went north enough that not even finns wanted to live therw

Pablo Nergigante
Apr 16, 2002

Finns are just Diet Magyars

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
Magyars are just diet Mongolians

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

R. Guyovich posted:

there's a difference between being a motor and being the motor. whites can be incorporated into the ranks of any revolutionary movement but it's almost certain they'll be a minority, due to all the preexisting biases and allegiances sakai lays out. this is an uncomfortable reality for the barely embryonic us left, who understand there is a diversity problem in their orgs but envisions the solution as more minority members with relatively unchanged leadership. demsoc types recognize the absurdity of the "hire more women guards" attitude from liberals but still have a problem organizing with minorities due to their own blind spots. this is a symptom of what sakai talks about, especially in the chapters on cpusa.

I agree with all of that, and I don’t see why it’d be uncomfortable for you besides base human racism. Wanna quote Sakai on why it’s a problem for demsocs?

to me you’re all americans, skin colour doesn’t make a difference to that. nationality is a curse just like race, one none of us had a choice about, and I do not understand why you insist on slapping additional qualifiers to your american nationality like it somehow makes it different or better or somehing

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Dreddout posted:

Magyars are just diet Mongolians

And they're actually unrelated. What is an interesting question is the relation between Uralics and Aryans, since their assumed urheimat are right next to each other, but the languages show few if any common words

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


arent the sami also uralic

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5