|
Can someone please post the BOM article for the 6th time thx
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 00:09 |
|
|
My dog is happy as poo poo 24/7.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 03:49
|
|
|
Birb is the new amethyst.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
If that refugee kid didnt exist he wouldnt be suffering. murder all refugee children
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 08:31
|
|
|
Do you reckon you could maybe cut the poo poo with the dude pics that are bordering on NSFW or better yet just loving stop posting all together?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 11:53
|
|
|
If I posted pics of women dressed in a similar fashion this thread would lose its loving mind and I'd be probated or banned for it. But gay almost-porn is ok because we dare not say gay stuff is inappropriate. People might think you are homophobic or something.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 07:04
|
|
|
Wait, are you telling me we are still bad at refugees? jee whiz what a week. so much has changed!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2016 12:26
|
|
|
SadisTech posted:Bahahaha what "debate and free thought" gets stifled by minorities and/or the vulnerable having a place that they can identify as their own? This thread.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
the CBD lockout laws are poo poo if only because all the roided up fuckwits with anger issues are now spending more time in Newtown and Enmore and generally bringing the same problems with them. Like I have said before, we DO have a culture, its just one of whinging about public safety and legislation pandering to it. 2 dead teenagers is no reason to close down a city after midnight.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 08:01
|
|
|
Birb Katter posted:You've taken a late night crowd from an area built up around having a late night crowd and stuck it in a suburb. I'd it that hard to grasp that an urban entertainment district is different to a suburban shopping strip? And now that suburb's being changed for the worse. all food outlets close at midnight, with increased violence, increased numbers and they are coming from thecity half pissed and sobering up and getting cranky about it, with no loving food to buy to put them to sleep. If we stopped treating everyone like babbies perhaps they wouldnt act like it, you know, like everywhere else on earth.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 10:32
|
|
|
Theres nothing wrong with alcohol culture though. I know people who can drink a case of beer on their own and they dont get to a point where they are punching randoms in the streets. the violence issue is another thing entirely separate from drinking that no one wants to talk about because its too hard to solve.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 11:02
|
|
|
Recoome posted:Oh yeah really that's fascinating stuff ok yeah alcohol is bad. Its not the actual cause of violence though. Most people that get shitfaced dont have the unrelenting desire to hit someone unawares.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 12:28
|
|
|
Fake. Luna park doesn't have a roller coaster.  (The mouse one doesn't count.)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
Why does it cost the community anything at all? EDIT: lol finally get a custom title. Laserface fucked around with this message at 04:36 on Feb 7, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
Periphery posted:Emergency services aren't provided for free. Why isnt the rescue costs transferred to the victim? thats how they handle out of bounds skiing in Japan and it seems to keep the noobs in check.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 04:38
|
|
|
Periphery posted:It's probably not worth the effort or cost associated with collecting the money or the long term costs of negative societal impacts of dumping a 400k+ cost on someone if they can't easily afford it. A user pays system for emergency services is a loving stupid idea. Hmm Make someone engaging in risk taking behaviour pay for their own mistakes after we go to the effort of advertising all the risks OR make the community pay for it. This sure is a tough one. Maybe, just maybe, if dangerous activities were a little bit more dangerous thanks to removing the government funded safety net, people would take more care and/or not partake in those activities. It is no ones fault but the fishers if they fall in the water. Wearing a life jacket isnt necessarily a bad thing. Wakeboarders can wake board and do fancy tricks while wearing theirs, Im sure they would be suitable for fishing in.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 07:58
|
|
|
Starshark posted:See if you can find the post that already addressed this making you look like an idiot. So we should just bail out every fuckwit who gets in over their head? why dont we help gamblers, drug addicts, and criminals? gay picnic defence posted:Too bad if your preferred entertainment doesn't involve sitting in a dark room drinking goon and watching a screen. Take them Rock Fishing!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 09:23
|
|
|
my housemate has been rorting centrelink while working cash in hand for loving ages. I dont want to dob her in because she couldnt afford to pay our internet bill if she did and that just isnt gonna fly with me (losing internet)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 10:47
|
|
|
Birb Katter posted:So what you're saying is that it's not enough money for people to survive on and they will break the law rather than deal with the miserly existence that people want to thrust on them? No she was using it to pay off the crippling debt she had accumulated from being a lovely human being. While spending most of her other money on going out getting shitfaced in the city. she also plans to take her degree overseas when she graduates this year. an all round leaner.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 10:56
|
|
|
Birb Katter posted:So she was using the extra money to self fund therapy to distract from the crushing existence that is living on the dole. Got it. shes not 'on the dole' if shes working for $600 a week cash in hand mate. thats a pretty substantial income.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2016 11:11
|
|
|
Maybe if the government wasnt spending upwards of 65K a head for basic IT work they would have money for server upgrades. I applied for a few jobs that were basically 'can you troubleshoot MS office' and they were paying up to 75k a year with super. The office of state revenue was one of them, but it was so boring just visiting there to do the interview that I wanted to kill myself.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
I want to punch fat people who blame genetics for their weight but then I think of all the gross poo poo I would get all over my hand as it slowly careens into their gelatinous mass and I start dry reaching. I mean if that wasn't bad enough I can't even get a loving disability pension for it either.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2016 11:19
|
|
|
Serrath posted:The most current models hold that you can genetically inherent the propensity to store larger amounts of fat in the presence of over abundant food, not the quality of being obese specifically gently caress if only human beings had some kind of overriding free will they could engage to avoid unhealthy behaviour.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2016 12:56
|
|
|
~Story time~ For the record I used to be a pretty sedentary person (gaming 5-7hrs a night, no exercise ever, desk job) who has never been into sports or fitness or anything to do with active lifestyles. I was comfortable with my lovely diet and lovely lifestyle because they enabled each other. I don't even know why I did it but I joined a gym about 6 months ago. I hate the idea of gyms and the stereotypes. everything about the 'gym person' image was the exact opposite of what I am. I didn't even want to do it. I didn't want to be muscle-y, I didn't want to lose weight, I didn't want to get sweaty and exert myself. I went from not even being able to complete a single pushup to doing 60 in a row without much hassle in 6 months. Its a 30min commitment 3 days a week, I barely changed my eating habits (I still eat fast food/get stoned and gorge on 30 McNuggets) and I still dropped a pants size (closing in on two). Admittedly I wasn't obese, but I was basically a skinny fat dude with a pot belly and now I actually have some body definition besides a gut. if I put 100% of my effort behind this poo poo I would probably be one of those 100kg of lean muscle guys ready to king hit dudes in The Cross by now. But I don't really like exerting myself and getting sweaty so I just do what I can (with a weekly PT session to really push me.) And you know what? I feel better about myself than loving ever. For literally the first time in my 30 years of existing, I can look at myself naked in the mirror and actually feel GOOD about myself. After being picked on for my entire schooling life for being a skinny, pasty four-eyes at schools in The Shire (where if you aren't tanned and surfie you're basically scum), to the point where I tried to kill myself at the age of 12, 13 and 18 (and for unrelated but similar reasons at 25 and 28) that is a massive deal. I still struggle with self confidence because its hard to undo being told you cant/wont achieve anything for most of your childhood by classmates and father, but its starting to come around (with a good psychologist). Can't afford a gym membership? walk around the loving block. walk up and down your apartment buildings stairs. JUST EAT LESS. no one needs a footlong sandwich, or chips with their hamburger/steak/schnitty. You'll save money by ordering smaller meals too. Self Esteem? 24hr gym. go at 2AM. Just because you won't progress as quickly as someone who has *good genetics* doesn't mean it's futile. A buddy of mine is Korean, and I can put on muscle twice as quick as him with a fraction of the effort. He still gets to the gym every loving day and works for the small gains he can make. Being genetically predisposed to something doesn't stop the person IF THEY WANT IT ENOUGH. poo poo, it's not even really that easy for me to lose the relatively small amount of fat I have, probably because I am genetically predisposed to having a beer gut like my dad does, and his dad did. I lost my rear end before I lost anything off my belly. I dont want/expect anyone to feel sorry for me after this post, but its not some massive lifestyle shift to begin being healthy, and I figured I might be a somewhat relatable situation to others in here. Blaming Genetics is just another reason to not try and its a lovely one. If thats your attitude I hope you dont procreate, lest your children be stricken with the same insurmountable struggle of not having a second helping. Serrath posted:The most current models hold that you can genetically inherent the propensity to store larger amounts of fat in the presence of over abundant food, not the quality of being obese specifically Its probably just that processed sugar is in loving ~everything,~ even normally considered healthy foods, and it fucks with your brain and your digestive system/metabolism. The amount of fatties I see drinking a gigantic Boost Juice under the assumption it is good for them is really scary. Fat free poo poo is loaded with sugar so it tastes good. you would be better off with full fat whatever than with 98% fat free whatever. People tell you to avoid Coke but Lift/Solo/lemonade has like twice the sugar of Coke (which is still bad but its an interesting example) Its sort of not as bad in Australia thanks to not being reliant on High Fructose Corn Syrup as a sweetener but its still pretty loving bad.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2016 15:36
|
|
|
open24hours posted:http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/10/australians-to-bypass-car-dealers-and-import-directly-from-japan-and-uk The used imports market is full of local stock at dirt cheap prices as it is. And odo wind backs could be abused more now - buy a lightly used vehicle, wind back to under 500kms and sell as near new (according the article). Though 80 bucks to check the dereg papers is nothing on a few thousand dollars+ The overall condition of the cars should improve though as you're less likely to get R grade stuff being sold as "4.5A"
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
Niche vehicles. My 180sx could be sold for as much as I bought it for 8 years ago. This new law is likely to just make expensive cars that would be out of reach for the vast number of people slightly cheaper for the upper class to buy (eg luxury and super cars).
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
MonoAus posted:Had to say thanks to Laserface for this. Your ~Story~ persuaded me to get a much lighter lunch today. Nah dude it was all just chemicals in your brain randomly mixing. Go get a Big Mac to correct this neurological lapse and submit to your biological overlords. good job, you gotta start somewhere
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 09:13
|
|
|
Frogmanv2 posted:I love how oblivious you are. Whatever helps you justify that second Big Mac of the day dude 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 12:15
|
|
|
If only you had different neurochemistry to prevent the involuntary over eating and involuntary laziness. How does someone so driven by monkey brain chemicals even loving post this garbage ffs
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 12:19
|
|
|
Before I interact with anyone I check with Auspol what is an acceptable word to use.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2016 12:46
|
|
|
lol what culture more like.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2016 13:00
|
|
|
Redcordial posted:Laserface aka MajorDisgrace is just trying to find someone to entertain him on this here day, don't be too harsh! you're really bad at the posting.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2016 13:39
|
|
|
The problem with the RSA is that it's the responsible service of alcohol, not the responsible consumption. It puts bars on the front foot the second someone is drinking too much or causing a ruckus, they get kicked out. Then they can't get in anywhere else, they get mad, aggressive and eventually ruin someone else's night either directly or indirectly. If you didn't have bars itching to kick out pissheads they'd likely stay in a venue and drink themselves stupid until they want to leave. By all means kick out trouble makers who are starting fights or being otherwise rampant dickheads but Most people can have 20 beers in a night and all they will do is get a bit shouty. Big deal. I mean it's basically what happens now except you have bouncers everywhere looking for a reason to exert force on someone. RSA just gives them a reason to do it.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2016 06:42
|
|
|
Tim Minchin is garbage but his song is better than cartoons by a loving long shot.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...219-gmyq2k.html I mean, isnt that half the point of removing negative gearing?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2016 08:14
|
|
|
pages late but lmao at 'we should speed govern all cars' Plenty of cars are already speed governed and its easily defeated with an ECU flash. poo poo, some cars you just disconnect the spedometer signal wire and you're done. 2 minutes under the car with a spanner. And yes, we SHOULD make everyone do more driver training to make them better drivers. there is zero downside to improving driver ability and awareness. You dont have to teach them how to hit an apex or heel-toe, just teach them how to emergency brake, avoid obstacles correctly and expose them to hazards in a controlled environment. Its much easier to understand just how much extra stopping distance you need from 130 instead of 110 if you put someone in their own car on a wet skid pan and ask them to do it. but no lets punish everyone because of the mistakes of a few, that seems like a totally good idea that isnt having a massive public backlash right now.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2016 14:01
|
|
|
BlitzkriegOfColour posted:First of all, making people comply with the law isn't punishment, unless you view speeding as an inalienable right or something. The punishment is making all vehicles hit a brick wall in terms of speed because some idiots drove beyond their ability and died. What about people who want to drive recreationally? What happens when you want to use a Motorsport facility or driver training? What about getting chased by a vehicle that has speed governance removed? The specific case referenced would have been avoided entirely if the police weren't even there. Odds on the loving pig in the highway patrol vehicle saw a car full of Browns and decided to hook a U turn and give them a hard time. I saw the exact same thing happen last night in Newtown to a bunch of middle eastern guys on King st. They were doing nothing wrong and travelling in the opposite direction to the cops who ripped a skid at the lights to catch up and loving RBT the guy. There was at least 10 other cars travelling the same direction as the cops too. He was spoiled for choice to meet his quota. Zero reason to do what he did to pull that car over. It's no wonder the driver shat himself and tried to run. Drunk or not, having a car chase you like that is intimidating as gently caress. My skinny white boy brother had the same thing happen to him on the night of the Cronulla riots - he was dropping a friend home (they had been working on a music project that day and when the evening revenge attacks began decided to delay leaving until it settled) and an unmarked cop car ran up behind him at high speed with its high beams on, my brother panicked and Floored it to escape what he thought was a car full of angry lebs coming to kill him, and only after he breached the speed limit by 30+ did they throw the sirens on and booked him for speeding. Something he had no intention of doing until they arrived. As a result he lost his license for 6 months, and his job by extension. I just wanted to point out how loving dumb you cunts are to even suggest the idea that improving driver training wouldn't reduce road fatalities (or at least the one dopey oval office who suggested it was going to make everyone into a race car driver and therefore less safe). It took me one track day on a course that doesn't even hit 110kmh on the straight to teach me just how quickly poo poo can go wrong in a controlled environment, let alone the streets where you have dickheads all around you barely paying attention. 120hrs of city driving with mum/dad in the passenger seat boredly cruising Facebook until you arrive is insufficient education for operating a vehicle. most of you are probably old enough to have required less hours or probably none at all.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
thatfatkid posted:It's genuinely disheartening to see how very authoritarian posters here are when it comes to certain topics they don't approve of. Do yous not see how the govt limiting certain things which have never been done so before could set a dangerous precedent and encourages further removal of freedoms which yous obviously take for granted. No you see I don't have a car and cannot understand why someone should want one or even enjoy using one so therefore ban all cars. I also think education is fantastic but not when it's training you how to operate a car better than our current lovely standard of education because cars are evil. I also totally ignore the parallels between speed governing every single car and the Sydney lockout laws. And what do you mean you heard me yesterday lamenting the erosion of our freedom and privacy in the name of safety what how is that even related. I ride a bicycle and what makes me mad is my helmet messing up my fringe on my way to work in the morning.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
xPanda posted:He doesn't have any, he's trying to muddy the waters and conflate distinct issues because the government is trying to prevent him breaking the law and endangering himself and others by stopping him from doing something he shouldn't be doing anyway - speeding. Most people have the capability to punch someone in the back of the head after drinking a skin full but they dont, but we're all being told to go home early because of that. Most people have the ability to go faster than the posted speed limit but hey guess what, the vast majority of motorists dont and even of the portion that do, an even smaller portion result in injuries or death. Lockout laws arent designed to keep people safe, they are designed to funnel people into a casino, just like speeding fines and no helmet fines are designed to make people happy that other people they dont like are getting in trouble (and the government is making money off it). We are a nation of whingers. we dont want other people doing/having/getting anything we dont do/have/get. If they do, we want them punished. Also BB if you agree with GPS speed governing you better also agree with GPS tracking because loving lmao if you think that isnt going to be the primary use of such a system.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 00:09 |
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:Listening to doctors and nurses who work friday and saturday nights in major hospitals leads me to think that the lockout laws are a good idea that have been twisted by opportunists to funnel people into the casino. If angry drunk bogans only killed and maimed one another it'd be fine but respectable people cop it as well. Same deal with speeding drivers/hoons. It's not the nanny state stepping in to protect people from themselves, it's protecting people from fuckwits. TBH I dont truly believe that lockout laws were to get people into the casino, but making that specific area exempt from the laws is a pretty bad joke. Casinos dont need to operate 24/7 to be profitable Im sure. But, like most laws, they are knee jerk poo poo that isnt fully researched to appease a noisy few. There is other more serious poo poo we should be devoting time and resources to fixing (domestic violence, homelessness, mental health) but they dont have lobbyists with deep pockets.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2016 06:27
|
|