Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
How many quarters after Q1 2016 till Marissa Mayer is unemployed?
1 or fewer
2
4
Her job is guaranteed; what are you even talking about?
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Just got a wire alert that says the U.S. Navy apparently narrowed the search zone and knows the general location of the sub, but everyone on board is believed to be dead.

Edit: Coast Guard says they have evidence that the sub was destroyed or damaged by a failure of the pressure chamber.

https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/status/1671956815091826700

If so, ew. Human soda pop spraying out of a can

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
The hull of this thing was carbon fiber. I know carbon fiber is strong and light and cool, but it fails catastrophically. Why would you choose something that gives no warning of catastrophic failure? Hubris like this is why people are mocking them.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

BougieBitch posted:

I don't think I agree, certainly not for cities with public transit like NYC. Shuttered storefronts are definitely a sort of shorthand for economic bad times, but in my experience the thing killing storefronts is office buildings, so if the value goes down enough for stores to actually be able to pay the rents it would probably enhance the appeal of living in the city if anything. I'm less familiar with NY specifically, but I can certainly point at a number of office buildings in my city that would be vastly better as apartments with a floor or two of retail at the bottom, and if the value of office space plummets enough that owners have to accept the "new normal" and convert them it seems like all upside to me. Given how residential properties kept getting eaten up by cash offers from speculators, I can't imagine that office owners couldn't find buyers if they don't want to do it themselves

Edit: also, given that another common shorthand for how "desirable" a place is involves the paper bag test, I think we can safely discard the heuristics used by landlords

Everybody talks about remaking offices as apartments. Any clue on the cost of adding the plumbing for hundreds of apartments to a building not at all designed for that? Plus changing the air con and electrical layout and adding lots of walls with soundproofing. This sounds like a vast expense.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Evil Fluffy posted:

This is to be expected from CNN, the media outlet run by the brilliant minds behind "what if we tried to cater to the Fox News crowd" only to be surprised that their rating tanked when they didn't manage to draw in an audience that has been thoroughly conditioned to think any outlet to the left of Fox News (and sometimes even Fox itself) is Woke Antifa Commie propaganda trying to undermine America.

Still costs less than building from scratch and would generate a ton of work. Though there's already a huge shortage of trade workers in a lot of areas so trying to get someone for a small/moderate repair job is hell because they're getting more large work offers that pay far better relative to the time they have to spend on it.

You sure about that? Taking a 20 year old building and bringing it up to code for residential is cheaper than building block style apartments somewhere else? Also, is the government going to just take the buildings or are they going to buy them? So many questions, but people just throw "turn office buildings into apartments" like it's easy.

I'm tired of people just throwing out grand ideas like this without thinking it through. It doesn't help anything, it just makes even less informed people mad when this "simple" solution doesn't take place.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Absurd Alhazred posted:

I mean, the last few waves of city gentrification hinged around industrial to residential conversions. I have a hard time believing it's as difficult as we're being told by the people who have a vested interest in doing as little as possible to get as much rent as possible.

A 20 story building isn't the same as a 300 ft long building.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Arivia posted:

Then why don’t you fix it, mister fuckin Jesus III. Turn offices into homes or some poo poo for the 2020s needy.

If you're counting on miracles, I have bad news for you.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Professor Beetus posted:

Lol people, like me, on this very page, have pointed out that it would be a massive undertaking requiring government support. We know it's not something you can fix with a magic wand. We just think it would be worth it.

It would be a massive waste of money and time, lol. Modifying giant skyscrapers is not your cheapest option. Plus, you'd be giving a bunch of money to a few building owners. Or you could have the government size property. That sure would work well!

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Wreck'em and replace them with 1+5s, then.

Seriously, though, I think you, Jesus III, are underselling how much interior refurbishing happens every time a company moves to a new office space. I've witnessed two of these (from a distance, because I stayed WFH), and I have a hard time believing remodeling for residential is that big of a deal.

Yeah, you don't multiply the amount of plumbing fixtures by 10 every time you shuffle offices around. I work in a massive building in downtown Dallas. I watched the EPA move out of that same building. I know what they do.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
Yeah, it looks like you'd have to pass a massive bill that would give money to the richest landlords in the world.

The cost of renovating may (and I doubt it) be cheaper, but the cost of emptying buildings, less valuable rents, and renovating is unviable in the current economy.

I agree, if you could get congress to agree on a massive housing project that injects a trillion bucks into the economy it would be great. But, if that happens I also want universal healthcare. Both should pass just as easily.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Irony.or.Death posted:

If you're only interested in politically realistic solutions there's nothing to discuss because they don't exist; your "build somewhere else instead" idea doesn't work because we won't build transportation infrastructure either.

Yep, it's nice to see you agree with me. What's the point in discussing stupid crap that will never pass and then get mad at it?.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
Most artists are less valuable to Spotify than Spotify is to those artists. Most songs aren't worth even a penny to listen to. I bet most of you have "stolen" songs, so the value really is zero to a lot of people.

CDs cost more per song because you "own" them. It's also a concrete cultural stake in an artist. You are saying these songs are worth more than nothing to me.

So, if you want to support artists, buy CDs.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Nenonen posted:

There's definitely something VERY wrong about having a washing machine in your kitchen/dining room/living room area. Like the part where you would likely be keeping your dirty laundry basket in your kitchen. Might as well hang the laundry to dry in your bedroom.

I'm assuming they have a bathroom. Why not put it there? There is at least precedent for that.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
You aren't required to have all the services. I sign up for a month, cancel, sign up for a different one. I always have a ton of shows and pay at most 20 bucks a month.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
Some people like to have servants. I'd much rather do it myself.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Mega Comrade posted:

:dafuq:

I prefer self checkout myself but this has to be the dumbest take I've seen on them.

Look at the people who go there: old boomers. They love servants and being waited on. I don't want someone to do something so simple. They don't look like they want to do it either.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

bawk posted:

I go grocery shopping still because I like browsing instead of tunnel-vision shopping, I did so much of that when I was living paycheck to paycheck, spending down to the decimal points in my bank account, that being able to just go walk around and look at/try new things is still a joy. And for as much as I like the store I usually go to, they're not the greatest at double-checking expiration dates on perishables (not to be confused with Best Buy dates because who cares) so no way in hell would I bother with online ordering where somebody else goes and does that for me.

It's also easier for me to plan meals based on what produce looks good/what's available. Sometimes they're just outta stuff or it looks gross/off/wilted, or they've got a deal of some kind at the deli counter that I can plan around. I don't get the same brainstorming going if I'm staring at an Add to Cart button

:wtc: I can promise you that people besides boomers buy groceries, they were the ones who showed up most often because they are the largest cross-section of people with free time during the day + doing things the way they've always done things instead of using new technology. Nobody gave a poo poo about whether you used a self checkout or used a regular checkout, they mostly cared about whether you were polite and/or if you partially prefilled-out your check so you could be through the line quicker

I go to the grocery store all the time. I see what I see. I go all times of day. The people standing in the check out linel are old people. I live in Texas. I guess you live someplace else.

I love that some of you want to protect a poo poo rear end job like grocery clerk. Unemployment is 4%. Go get a better job.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
That is literally a tech nightmare.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

M31 posted:

The Stella cars would like a word here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_(solar_vehicles) (and the other Solar Challenge cars as well)

The Wikipedia article points out that a roof array could easily charge a house and one or two cars, making the Stella kind of pointless.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
Find me an electric car that a person who lives in an apartment can afford, a solar array will not make it cheaper. That's a dumb rear end solution and discussing it outside of some "what if" forum seems like a waste of time.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Boris Galerkin posted:

Hi I’m someone that can afford an EV but I live in a place called a “city” which means I’m in an apartment.

In case you haven’t noticed, cities all over the US are building “luxury apartments” targeting for tech bros and other computer toucher adjacent workers. I bet you most if not all of those people renting one of those apartments can also afford an EV.

Hahahahaha! You ever seen the apartments I'm talking about? Two floors, 100s of units? That's what I'm talking about. Lluxury apartments will totally have chargers if you are paying 3 grand a month (Dallas TX prices, btw I think that's a city), but 1000 a month places won't have that anytime soon and some bartender can't afford an EV. I'm sure you'll bring up bar tenders that make a million a year.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Blut posted:

You can buy a brand new 2023 Chevvy Bolt for $19,995 in the US now with using the federal tax credit. Plenty of apartment dwellers and bartenders can afford that, thats not remotely a luxury vehicle price tag.

Put a solar panel on it now, what does it cost? That's what the argument was about. But thanks for the tip. If I find someone who wants a car they can afford but can't charge at their apartment, I'll let them know.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Boris Galerkin posted:

Quick googling says the inflation reduction act provides a tax credit of 30% of the hardware and installation cost. If I was a landlord why would I do this for less than 100%? What’s the tenant going to do, complain? I’ve got a list of 10 other tenants who could immediately move in.

Or you could charge more for your apartments to defray the costs! Those EV owners, on average, make more money and would be glad to pay!

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

MixMasterMalaria posted:

Are you aware that D&D doesn't mean derision and dismissiveness in the context of these forums?

I am pretty dismissive when people think putting solar panels on cars in the near future is a good idea. You've got me there. A big fault that I need to work on. Perhaps we should have a discussion about why some people are bad because of the fast food they like?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

niethan posted:

Public transport :angel:

The best form of self driving car

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Boris Galerkin posted:

It really should be verboten to quip about how much self checkout sucks without disclosing when the last time you used it was. The last time we talked about self checkout itt it sounded like some of you complaining haven’t used it since they were first implemented and base your entire experience on that one time 6 years ago when everything was lovely.

In the last 2 weeks I’ve used self checkouts in Target, Kroger, and Walmart and all times were fine and I was finished without issue or hassle. I bag as I go in Target and Walmart and they’ve never complained about missing items or that I was taking too long. I do most of my grocery shopping in Kroger and they have the self checkout aisles where you scan your poo poo and it goes onto the belt so you can pack it up when you’re all done the way you want to bag stuff.

Someone in that linked thread strawmanned about not wanting to be arrested for stealing an Xbox with self checkout due to grainy camera footage and that’s just so wrong on multiple levels. First, I highly doubt any store outside of maybe Sams/Costco let you just grab an Xbox off the shelf and self checkout with it. At Target they’re all locked behind glass so you’ve got to ask someone to get one for you and then they make you pay immediately and you’ve got a receipt in case someone stops you on your way out, which they won’t because it’s understood you’ve already paid if it’s in your cart. Second, security cameras are not grainy.

A lot of the posters on SA are just Freepers with opinions we like.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
People totally steal all the time. The cameras are necessary. Just because you don't steal doesn't mean the cameras aren't necessary.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

No one should steal. Anyone that does should be punished. I had some dude steal my mail this weekend. Totally pressed charges.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
Nope, some idiot. Actually got called by the postal service inspector. Federal crime time.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Those stickers are crafting a rich narrative over the last year or two when I go to the gas station.

First, it was that Biden was holding back American energy production and driving up gas prices - "I did that."

Then, Biden miraculously caused gas prices to plummet and is reminding us of his power and his grace - "I did that."

Now, gas prices are ticking up higher, but not crazy high like before, and Biden is reminding us that his power may be unlimited, but his mercy is not. A stark reminder to live a valorous life filled with ice cream, vintage cars, and rambling stories about your childhood that are only 60% true or he will use his powers to raise the price of gas again - "I did that."

See, it's writing like this that makes me want a like button. I wish we could somehow convince people that presidents don't have magical powers.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
One of the great things about money is that it allows people to make choices about goods and services based on their own personal needs. Others, with the same money, can make different choices based on their needs!

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
You guys sound old.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
They should just make headlights always-on on new cars. How bad a drain can LEDS be? They're always-on on motorcycles

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
I thought they banned porn from this site a long time ago

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
I play Crusader Kings 3 and can easily watch TV. I just set it to the slowest speed. I don't watch challenging shows while playing, though, mostly sitcoms I've seen. I guess I just like hearing voices since I live alone.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
80%? That's crazy! Where did you live? That seems almost like a made up statistic

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
I've been in a couple hundred taxis in the last two decades, all over the US and never been scammed. Maybe you all just look like rubes? Maybe dress less touristy in your daily lives or don't make up shot for internet points.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

PT6A posted:

I initially read this as John Denver and agreed.

Too soon

Jesus III
May 23, 2007
I bet AI takes most art and music jobs where you don't have to perform live. Cost drives most commercial art decisions, Capitalists are going to always drive the cost lower. I could see art being made by humans as a luxury item that only the rich can afford.

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Elias_Maluco posted:

Nah, it won't. Unless the AI can make music actually as good as humans do, and I don't see that happening now or any near future, not with the technology we know

I bet it will be making tunes for commercials and stuff like that, though

edit: also, selling music made by humans is not expensive at all, and now less than ever. The industry already pays artists so little it would barely save anything with AI. A handful of artists make good money but that's because they are making such a massive profit for the industry that what they get is very little anyway

I don't know. What people like isn't that hard to figure out. They've already figured out how to make people spend money on cosmetics in video games, I bet they figure out how to sell people music made by machines

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jesus III
May 23, 2007

Elias_Maluco posted:

That can happen, but my point is more: why? Justin Bieber gets a lot of money, for sure, but the money he gets is pocket change compared to the money he makes for the industry. And than theres the fact he is a person of flesh and bones and can perform live and make millions for the industry from that too.

And thats a big huge pop star, most artists in the music industry get paid with pennies

edit: the kind music I see being taken by AI is stuff like soundtracks for commercials, small budget games, background music for internet videos etc

Sure, big personalities will still rule (until AI personalities) but, yeah be fearful if you are a working musician.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply