Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
How many quarters after Q1 2016 till Marissa Mayer is unemployed?
1 or fewer
2
4
Her job is guaranteed; what are you even talking about?
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

mllaneza posted:

Done right it's not "barely working" but "working just enough". A big part of (healthy) Agile is the concept of the Minimum Viable Product. At the start you pick out the most essential User Stories and get that into production. Say you've been tasked with developing an in-house employee database. The MVP would have all the fields you'll want in the database, the most essential reports a button click away, but if anyone wants a report that won't get used often or you can live without, they get to write some SQL. Once you have the MVP going, you work on the project backlog and implement new features in each sprint. If you did a thorough job of creating User Stories, you'll have fields in the database that won't get used for months or even years after the MVP launches, but they're part of the database from day one, just waiting to be used.

Of course, what's the realistic chance that you got the schema for the fields you are not actually using right, and there are no bugs in what's in them/oversights in test coverage of them?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
... and if this isn't enough, Eich is the creator of JavaScript.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Anno posted:

The lender can demand to be paid back in part or force the lendee to put up additional collateral due to the drop in value of the collateral already placed. If the lendee doesn't then the lender may force a sale of the placed collateral to repay their loan.

Aren't CEOs generally restricted from just selling stock w/o declaring it well in advance? How does this interact?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Arsenic Lupin posted:

I've said it before in this thread, but when Musk's net worth surpassed Jeff Bezos's, Musk sent Bezos a trophy labelled "#2". He has a lot of self-worth tied up in "the richest man in the world".

They are both poorer than Putin, anyway, who owns an entire country (though Putin may have some ...difficulties... spending money these days).

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Surely there may be practical issues if your share costs less than a cent?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Absurd Alhazred posted:

My experience with JIRA is that you have tasks/tickets/bugs whatever and it's kind of like a forums post where you can add assets discussing it and link to other problems/features and I don't know, I would much rather do that than emails or Slack for everything. Especially if I'm wondering in six months what the hell I was doing.

... That sounds like basically every bug tracker I've ever used? (If I've used JIRA it was enough of a one off that it didn't stick out)

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Pretty sure there actually are regulatory regimes for testing of self-driving, Tesla just ignored them.

Like you can find articles about how other companies received permits for doing particular kind of testing in particular place.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

It's certainly not ethical.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Evil Fluffy posted:

“I was writing C programs in the ’90s,” he said dismissively. “I understand how ­computers work.” Is some top-tier Engineer Brain.

And of course data center efficiency is more about how cooling systems work anyway.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Setting aside the dubiousness of the whole idea of talking to an AI representation of a historical figure, the particular choice of figures is just... why? What good could ever come from that?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

HootTheOwl posted:

Id be more worried about them paying for server space than I would be about their employees doing maintence work.

Of course, the physical servers need maintenance as well. And while number of employees needed for /technical/ maintenance can be smaller than what's needed under active development --- that requires that you don't have a moron running the company wanting major rearchitectures and firing tons of people without much thought.

.... And the hard part is always moderation anyway.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
It kinda makes me think of a student trying really hard to make sure they get at least some partial credit.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

PT6A posted:

An AV demolition derby would actually be fun as gently caress, and a good proving ground for generalized autonomy/AI. Good idea, old chum!

...What could possibly go wrong?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

notwithoutmyanus posted:

My problem with the chatgpt wave of hype is it looks like the exact same people who got into Crypto all over again. The same sort of braindead logic and euphoria from it being a new discovery to them while categorically ignoring any downsides or even general analysis of what they're getting out of it (and what they're doing to the dataset). In short, people lack a personal quality filter, critical thinking, or fail to understand that a tool is a tool and there can be very good and very bad implications, simultaneously - from this.

I tried it out and it gave me bad code, people said give it very specific tasks to make it work. It was nice to have some reference towards a code idea I was working on, but that's all. Am I going to benefit spending 10hrs trying to figure out how to work prompts for chatgpt to then ask for code again that I could better ask human beings with knowledge? I'm going with no. It just feels like a novelty/niche.
Well, with cryptocurrency of course the first users were nerds going "this is neat, I can mine $1.50 and then use it to buy a snack in a vending machine in (some MIT building)", but then the speculators and conmen came in. It feels like this is on a more accelerated timescale.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Epic High Five posted:

ChatGPT would absolutely be an improvement over the SCOTUS, but that's not because ChatGPT is good, it's because the institution is so fundamentally bad that replacing it with nothing would be an improvement. Unfortunately the chatbot that replaced it would be trained on only the worst poo poo our lords and betters have ever put out.

I wonder if the Dred Scott decision is in the training set...

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Grammy when?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

pumpinglemma posted:

Wow. Laying off the bottom 7% would be cruel and stupid, but at least there would be method to the madness. I can't think of any reason to do it this way except a sincere belief that all peons are completely interchangeable, disposable and replaceable units of work. Everyone involved needs to be made homeless.

I suspect you have to believe that to get an MBA.

Edit: and I don't just mean layoffs. I have seen non-firing reorgs that just waste people's expertise making people re-learn stuff to make one org chart or another look nicer.

OddObserver fucked around with this message at 22:26 on Feb 10, 2023

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Electric Wrigglies posted:

I got an Iphone mini for my partner and it seems about the same size as the previous Iphone 7. It's a good size and does the job.

Unlike the above mentioned cheapo AliExpress phone it probably doesn't ran out of storage after installing a single app, too. Sadly non-crap small Android phones doesn't seem to be a very targeted market.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Oxyclean posted:

All the attempts to make "show your government ID to look at porn" laws made me think - political will aside, tech wise, how hard would proof-of-identity be to implement on phone systems and otherwise curb spoofing?

Cause it dawns on me just how silly it is that people can get texts from random numbers pretending to be UPS, Fedex, etc -and obviously it's annoying me that there seems to be more concern about stopping online anonymity for dumb puritanical (and probably more insidious reasons too) then there seems to be any effort being made to curb phone/text scamming.

It actually is (mostly?) implemented these days:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STIR/SHAKEN

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

withak posted:

Presumably that person's use of their unsecured home computer to hold Important Corporate Data was against policy, is there really anything a company can do on the IT/Security side if an employee with access to this kind of data is determined to gently caress up this badly?


edit: As far as I can tell, the problem was an employee with access to a lot of stuff typed in an important password on a computer that had a keylogger running, right?

Ideally no single employee would be able to mass-access user data in decrypted form. This is obviously very hard in practice.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Stadia made a strange business choice --- it was basically trying to be a new console. Which is pretty nice if you want to play SomeNewGame without shelling out the bucks for a new XBox or whatever, except people who care about SomeNewGame probably already had a gaming device ?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
I think it's also that companies sometimes do buybacks shortly before running into financial problems, rather than keep a reserve.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Compiling isn't working.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Rent-A-Cop posted:

I see mortgage backed securities. Did this bank just do a speedrun of 2008?



From what I understood, not really, in that those securities don't have any sort of problem, but they are long-term commitments which is kinda an issue for a bank that may have people come in and ask for X bucks to pay the bills now.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Aramis posted:

Yes and no. A long term loan at a lower interest rate than the Fed rate might as well be almost worthless until the due date since no one in their right mind would want to buy them unless unless they get them at a huge discount.

Aha, thanks, I was missing the connection to interest rates. So if I understood your clarification it went something like this:
1) Bank invests in long-term stuff that has low interest rate return but is low risk. The expectation is that since it's low risk it would be easy to sell to someone at nominal price if they need cash to meet consumer demands.
2) Fed raises rates
3) Now it's hard to sell the debt since potential buyers can get better returns elsewhere (US bonds?)

... It feels like something the FDIC involvement could theoretically fix then, in that holding on to stuff for long-term is in principle OK for US government (but I don't know if that's something that's actually permitted absent an explicit congressional bailout).

Also I am right to say that doing #1 while interest rates were super-low was a dubious decision? Though I feel like normally you want banks doing low risk/low return stuff, so what am I missing here?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Boris Galerkin posted:

This schadenfreude tea tastes delicious.

Sadly it probably won't be the VCs losing their jobs.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

What is inevitable is FDIC working hard to liquidate the assets so depositors get as much money back as possible, including those over 250K, but how much they manage and how long it takes is more complicated (the insured stuff they promised will be accessible by Monday). Maybe they will recover 100%. Maybe a lot less....

BougieBitch posted:

... and it has barely any people using it individually, given the proportion of deposits that are over the $250k line.



That may actually not be true:
https://mobile.twitter.com/JosephPolitano/status/1634904512787025920

...but then those people are guaranteed to be fine because FDIC exists.

OddObserver fucked around with this message at 16:16 on Mar 12, 2023

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Smaller towns are extremely vulnerable to their one-big-employer going away...

Anyway:
https://mobile.twitter.com/modestproposal1/status/1634948185469902850

(Dunno about the source account, but seems to match the beginning of):
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/fdic-auction-for-svb-said-to-be-underway-final-bids-due-sunday

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Morrow posted:

It's not illegal to cause a bank run, even if he can be linked to it. It's just a strong reason not to do business with him but there will always be frogs lining up to take him across the river.

I hope SEC checks if he did some shorting of the stock simultaneous to that, though...

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
This bit may matter a lot (though I am very much beyond the edges of where I truly understand these things:
https://twitter.com/StevenKelly49/status/1635046064284930048

... which sounds like Fed can take the overly illiquid assets like SVB had and help get something more liquid back (at some interest?) which presumably also makes SVB assets less sucky.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Morrow posted:

The assumption is that a business has the resources to do due diligence, as does someone with more than 250k in the bank, to make sure their finances are sound.

That frankly strikes me as unreasonable and inefficient. A company making tableware IMHO should be expected to understand forks and dishes, not bank balance sheets... and it would make more sense to examine each bank once by, say, experts at the regulator, rather than expect every business with 10 employees to contract an expert on the banking sector periodically!

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
At the very least it's pretty clear that the cutoff clearly didn't apply to just small banks. Maybe if the cutoff was 250 million or something it would actually be reasonable...

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
VR games aren't for me, but I can understand why some people may want them and why, say, Sony, would put in money into making a VR product.... But who the heck wants VR for meetings ?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

cinci zoo sniper posted:

That's an alright tradeoff, I feel. :colbert:

... How good is Azure translate output for Latvian?

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

HootTheOwl posted:

Now that crypto fell we need a new wasteful use for all these GPUs!

It's clearly a conspiracy by console manufacturers to kill PC gaming!

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Xand_Man posted:

can we give you poo poo for your spelling

I think for that particular word you should rather blame the French (Academy?)

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

LASER BEAM DREAM posted:

How long do you get to gently caress with the SEC until they do something about it? Is it never?

Last time the SEC tried to do something IIRC the courts gave him some sort of "you have to be a total moron to pay attention to what he says so it does not count" immunity from SEC

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

I am not sure that the supposed size of lawsuit is worth attention, but changing Twitter icon to dogecoin while being sued about dogecoin seems like the sort of thing a lawyer would recommend against.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
There is something amusingly (in)appropriate in comparing AIs via prompts that were trained on one of them.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Aramis posted:

If any of those were captured in Europe, then sparks are going to fly. EU regulators do not mess around when it come to PII.

This sounds bad enough for American regulators to care, too.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply