Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008



You can play at home! http://www.openprocessing.org/sketch/306571/embed/?width=900&height=350&border=true

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008

Sheng-ji Yang posted:

i like how it being 58% bernie 42% hillary is "tight"


Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008

I'd like to see this, but with Christie ahead of Rubio.

Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008


I guess that makes up for the 6 coin tosses in a row that Hillary won.

Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008

John Kasich going Oprah "You made it happen! You made it happen! You made it happen! You get a car!"

Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008

Sun coming up
Over New York City

Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008

Tubesock posted:

The republican party has super delegates but they are bound to vote the same as the primary results, so it's just a title. Ron Paul managed to get the support of a bunch of super delegates in 2012 so in response the GOP changed the rules to force the super delegates to vote with the primary. Thus preventing scrub-tier candidates from getting any delegates. And now that's gonna burn them with Trump.

That and campaign finance deregulation have put republicans in a trap of their own making.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pomplamoose
Jun 28, 2008

fishmech posted:

Does anyone know why there's still 17 precincts not reporting?


one problem is that many districts with high non-voter rates, it's because of policies that make it really hard or impossible to vote for many of the non-voters. as such, even if you could get them to try to vote, they might not be able to!

like the most egregious example is banning voting by people ever convicted of a felony:


Incidentally, this tends to mean that a rural areas where prisons go get to count all the prisoners towards district apportionment, but the prisoners can't vote. which is kinda like how slave states could count slaves towards apportionment.


this is a terrible idea so long as the usps is expected to operate with minimal tax funding, to be honest. it's quite high risk, and should only be done in conjunction with ending the pseudo-seperate operation it's been under since nixon

Where's the source of that map?

  • Locked thread