|
bad day posted:It was competently shot. I feel like a lot of the action actually looks pretty lousy compared to David Ayer's usual work. I'm not saying individual shots are necessarily badly composed, but it doesn't have the same impact as Sabotage or Fury.
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2017 04:42
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 16:41 |
|
|
Yeah, Objectivism doesn't have any sort of claim over individualism or personal liberty, which are fundamental ideals of lots of different value systems. The question is what those ideals actually mean within that value system. None of the distinctive, identifying features of Objectivism, like individualism and personal liberty being specifically embodied by laissez-faire capitalism and disregard for the welfare of others is present in any of Snyder's works.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:I just want to remind you guys that Snyder being done with comic books means we might get his George Washington 300 movie, which everyone has forgotten about. Neither have I, friend. Neither have I.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:e: I posted the quote last page? He compliments the book. Nah, he describes the book in fairly neutral language.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
That description reminds me a fair bit of Guy Ritchie's King Arthur movie.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:I still like that movie. Same.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
Kinda baffled that Sophie Turner is being handed a franchise like that. I get they're losing Jennifer Lawrence, but she could phone it in in Apocalypse and still have more screen presence.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
WENTZ WAGON NUI posted:Guessing she won't be more than a secondary character even in the "Phoenix arc" movie. This is Jean Grey after all, most famous for being fought over between the most and least popular X-Mans, dying, and heel turns Who's going to be the main character, then? loving Cyclops? I thought Jackman was out. Wait, IMDB lists Lawrence, McAvoy, and Fassbender. I had assumed they were done after Apocalypse. This all makes way more sense now, my bad.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:Let me say this: I felt exactly like you did, I thought it was a shot at Spidey's working class roots and everyman appeal to make him beholden to Tony Stark, but they did a few things to "soften" the blow (and one really gross thing that I despised, but that's a spoiler). What's the really gross thing?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2017 00:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 16:41 |
|
|
Taintrunner posted:Dan's not confused at all. He said it "looked like." He knows, he's simply stating what it looks like in the shot. It's a perfectly valid opinion and it's a shame to watch people be so disingenuous for the sake of a dogpile. Nope, you're misreading his statement. https://twitter.com/FoldableHuman/status/940493552278126592 He's saying it only "looks like" Superman is reacting to nothing at all, on the theory that the film is supposed to be showing him reacting to the charred corpses of the family. Which means he's unhappy that the film is successfully portraying what's going on: Superman is reacting to the situation as a whole, not reacting to one specific thing that he's looking at.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2017 20:02
|
|