|
pram posted:cucked im gay cucking snype
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 01:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 23:30 |
|
|
please don't delete yospos 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 07:52
|
|
|
~Coxy posted:
i like the barely held together rented to students sharehouse vibe but its probably less amusing when its your source of income or whatever
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 08:10
|
|
|
lowtax should just let the goons start their own offsite webforum using their own homebrew forum software and see if THAT ever gets anywhere. i think not my friends.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:i think not my friends. we know 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 08:14
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:hell most of you all seem to really hate it here, wierd why is this sub around? dom/sub relationship
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 08:59
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:hell most of you all seem to really hate it here, wierd why is this sub around? because it's a quarantine zone for angry nerds. do you really want us posting up a storm anywhere else?
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 10:53
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:because it's a quarantine zone for angry nerds. do you really want us posting up a storm anywhere else?
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 12:52
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:01
|
|
|
one can both like and enjoy the forums as well as laugh at past bad technical decisions, like they are not mutually exclusive
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:12
|
|
|
the spineless bitch thing was prob unnecessary tho
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:13
|
|
|
mishaq posted:this forum has higher availability and greater uptime given the user load than software/services multibillion dollar companies crap out not very hard to have high availability/uptime when you've only got like a dozen users tbh
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:29
|
|
|
sass is mad about sa yospos is mad about computer
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:34
|
|
|
mm we're more depressed about computer i think
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:40
|
|
|
pram posted:(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:43
|
|
|
realtalk i enjoy posting here about how bad sa is but i also just enjoy posting here in general, ilu lowtax 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:45
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:hell most of you all seem to really hate it here, wierd why is this sub around? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:52
|
|
|
sa changing to some "modern" forum software is akin to chrysler trying to solve its troubles by starting to make toyotas instead the analogy extends naturally to how stupid it is to post about it, just buy the camry and go on reddit like the rest of the world 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:53
|
|
|
pram posted:(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 13:53
|
|
|
 !!no one here is mad. we just like talking poo poo about computers. the radium stuff is computer talk so that leads everyone to talk about the forums. pram is a funny man and i dont think he should have been banned for what i read as a jokey joke please dont delete the funny computer forum.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:00
|
|
|
Bloody posted:mm we're more depressed about computer i think hm yes i think this is more accurate, can i change my order
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
I love my dead gay forums, and its cool and funny that guy got banned/owned. lomarf indeed.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
free pram
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:45
|
|
|
with a pram of equal or greater value
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:47
|
|
|
obstipator posted:pram is a funny man and i dont think he should have been banned for what i read as a jokey joke  that it's not actually worthy of a ban but otoh pram getting owned by lowtax was p  and we're all on a p deece six and a half figgies here so i'm not gonna complain about his 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:52
|
|
|
Jabor posted:or greater value
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 14:52
|
|
|
jony ive aces posted:free pram with every shaggar this is not a particularly good deal, please do not get suckered folks 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:04
|
|
|
my stepdads beer posted:please
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:06
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:so after it was all over how much did lowtax end up paying, total? all your 5s
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:22
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:sa changing to some "modern" forum software is akin to chrysler trying to solve its troubles by starting to make toyotas instead You see, the SA forums are a lot like middle Earth
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
fishmech posted:all your 5s i thought you were trained to coupons & deals
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
which subforum is the shire
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:You see, the SA forums are a lot like middle Earth oh go ahead, just drive into a car analogy
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
it would be nice if there were an actual requirements document for a migration to a modern codebase i know there's a lot of cruft and old code around and all kinds of crazy hackish behavior, but a specific audit of those things would help people understand exactly what was needed, and what could be dropped/rewritten like, i'm sure it would be a lot of work, and a lot of dealing with databases, load balancers, everything, but that requirements document isn't impossible
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
horse mans posted:it would be nice if there were an actual requirements document for a migration to a modern codebase lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
what part of my post is funny is it the implication that the forum maintainers can't be arsed to do this work? they've kept the lights on for a decently long time now, i give them slightly more credit than you i guess
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
Why do a ton of unnecessary work for no benefit when you said yourself the forums work fine?
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:08
|
|
|
emoji posted:Why do a ton of unnecessary work for no benefit when you said yourself the forums work fine? every part of this sentence is wrong it's not a ton of work, the work isn't unnecssary, it would have benefit, and i didn't say the forums work fine, i said they've been maintained
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 23:30 |
|
|
completely understandable i didn't really assume that e.g. the latest vbulletin would have all of the functionality we needed, but there's got to be a piece of forums software that allows for sane extensibility; in which case knowing what features you have the ability to rewrite and bolt on atomically might be feasible, and unless the features are completely intertwined, work on those can be done in parallel (i'm always looking for code poo poo to work on in my spare time, and i'm sure i'm not alone) edit: okay you answered my reply as i was writing it :-) thanks for the work you've been doing in any event, i'm sure it's slowly but surely getting better
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2016 16:21
|
|