|
You're wrong in my opinion op
|
# ? Apr 24, 2016 17:54 |
|
|
# ? May 2, 2024 08:59 |
|
Who What Now posted:Boobs are better. That's a fact.
|
# ? Apr 24, 2016 18:30 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2016 19:10 |
|
Postmodernism approves of this thread.
|
# ? Apr 24, 2016 20:07 |
|
OwlFancier posted:But is that falsifiable? If someone lies about their opinion, have they said an opinion, or a lie?
|
# ? Apr 24, 2016 23:18 |
|
That almost makes me like Achewood.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2016 01:01 |
|
Grundulum posted:That almost makes me like Achewood. The good Achewoods are really good, but the problem is that it's a 50:1 ratio of mediocre to amazing.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2016 01:14 |
|
OwlFancier posted:My understanding of supply side economics tells me that factually, boobs are approximately twice as valuable as butts. It takes as much socially necessary labor time to make 2 boobs as 1 butt, therefore each butt is worth two boobs. l2marx.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2016 13:08 |
|
wateroverfire posted:It takes as much socially necessary labor time to make 2 boobs as 1 butt, therefore each butt is worth two boobs. l2marx. Wrong, each butt has two cheeks, just as every set of boobs has two breasts. A butt is a group entity consisting of one set of two buttcheeks, therefore it is equivalent to one set of boobs.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2016 14:23 |
|
Both men and women have butts, so they are twice as plentiful as boobs, which men don't usually have. Goons are trying to correct the market, though.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2016 14:41 |
|
Ddraig posted:Both men and women have butts, so they are twice as plentiful as boobs, which men don't usually have. All men have have nipples, thus all men have boobs. Fact.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2016 13:55 |
|
|
# ? May 2, 2024 08:59 |
|
Who What Now posted:All men have have nipples, thus all men have boobs. Fact. There is more to boobs than function. You're starting to sound like the worst kind of rear end man and I don't think we'll ever see eye to eye on this matter, good Sir.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2016 22:51 |