|
Negligent posted:It's ok for the police to lie Cool
|
#
¿
May 2, 2016 03:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 13:24 |
|
|
Where was the Bolt article on the USA deliberately sabotaging our Air Force with the F-35?
|
|
#
¿
May 2, 2016 04:56
|
|
|
Negligent posted:I only accept dogecoins I mined a bunch of those and made about $16 moving them back and forth between other dumb nerd currencies. It was an experience I'd describe as boring and pointless.
|
|
#
¿
May 2, 2016 08:22
|
|
|
Pope on point
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
tithin posted:Pope on Dutton Pope is a national treasure
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
Attacking GPs will increase the load on hospitals (due to patients not visiting GP due to lack of bulk bill and letting preventable conditions worsen) and probably end up being a lot more expensive in the long term.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
The public health sector should have known better and donated to the Liberal party 
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
Negligent posted:what other beverages can we thank European settlement for Bovril
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2016 11:30
|
|
|
Anidav posted:There's that word again. It makes me furious that people don't understand that term at all. Pulling yourself up by your bootstraps is an impossible act and the term is meant to imply that something is unreasonably difficult bordering on impossible. Conservatives have no self awareness re: irony.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2016 00:08
|
|
|
Brick Dust Otis posted:Man if I was a journo I'd be hype as gently caress for a C130-J ride. I've flown from Hobart to East Sale RAAF Base in a C130-J. It's noisy as gently caress, but holy poo poo it can lift off the tarmac fast.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
MonoAus posted:Doesn't look like it http://nationals.org.au/candidates/ Jesus Christ is this the foetal alcohol syndrome fan club or something?
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2016 10:50
|
|
|
RDN has always been bourgie garbage. Unfortunately this got out right AFTER national conference where we could have tossed him to the wolves and elected a different leader.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
The only people fit to run the Greens are Tasmanians because we're all too poor to have au pairs and all too illiterate to abuse industrial relations law.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
Kat Delacour posted:When I was <7 for I have no idea how long I had a nanny, or au pair, or live in baby-sitter or whatever word suits. I'm pretty sure she worked in exchange for board but who knows if there was other money changing hands. My mum was a single working mother, my dad died and mum worked in the public service so we weren't rich or upper class either. The girl who took care of me was from the country, so it suited her to stay with us in inner melb, and sometimes I would go stay with her family during kinder/school holidays. Having help in the house doesn't make him rich. Being rich makes him rich. It either means he's rich or not paying them enough. Or, in this case, due to our lovely IR laws, both.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
Negligent posted:should have known when he wore a turtleneck in GQ fruity lexia makes you sexier
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
Kat Delacour posted:Maybe I'm part of the problem but I don't actually see what is wrong with exchanging board for wages, that is sum total greater than min wage per hour, for jobs where the workplace has accommodation. Like, if you had to live on a resort island/ski lodge/outdoor camp for work and you salary sacrificed or whatever your accommodations where the net result was a fair wage, because you would have spent that money on living expenses anyway, but the on-paper pay was less. It doesn't seem like exploitation to me unless the workplace is also otherwise exploitative, e.g. you're paid on an hourly basis but don't have set work hours so you're expected to be permanently on-call above and beyond the paid amount. I think we're just at an impasse here, but there's a huge problem in my opinion. Au pairs live with the family in order to do their job, so you're effectively making the worker pay for their ability to work for you. It'd be like making an office worker pay for the installation of their office furniture.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 03:40
|
|
|
turdbucket posted:M8 I'd be down with this if you weren't currently electing nick loving McKim and PWW as your top two senate spots. Tassie needs to get its poo poo together. Oh no, you get to keep them Federally so we don't have to have them down here. Kicking those two upstairs has done wonders for the state party's stupid-poo poo-per-second statistic.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
Representative Democracy will always be about choosing lesser evils, and it's very difficult to sell that to an already disillusioned youth who would rather not bother. You should still vote though.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:hahahaha Di Natale didn't even keep timesheets of his au pair's hours, but nah I'm sure we can trust that they weren't working more than 25 hours a week It's good to know that there's a viable alternative to the ALP when it comes to parties that shoot themselves in the feet with such wanton enthusiasm.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 03:18
|
|
|
There's only one effective way of ensuring professional standards in Australia's police forces and we all know what it is.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 04:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 13:24 |
|
|
Spudd posted:So I have a dumbarse liberal friend who really likes having his head so far up his own arse that he likes to think he's a critical thinker and spouts poo poo like this
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 06:02
|
|