|
Anidav posted:Is Turnbull original movie Lex or Smallville Lex Worse, insufferable Jesse Eisenberg Lex.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2016 01:41 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 16:08 |
|
Merry May Day everyone. The rich are in-season. Tucker up.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2016 04:03 |
|
LibertyCat posted:Please forums poster Cartoon tell me more about being braindead and marrying a Thai or Filipino lady. I believe it is considered a voluntary contract between two mutually benefitting partners, one getting sex and companionship and the other residency and eventually possible citizenship in Australia. This "trade" is the basis of all human action and furthermore demonstrates that if the economic migrants in our detention centres were actually the hardworking ambitious battlers, bleeding heart lefties paint them as, they too would have entered into sex bondage with a wealthy white man. That they didn't proves that they should fail the character test.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2016 05:23 |
|
You reckon Mal would try to position toy skulls behind him in all his pressers if he could get away with it?
|
# ¿ May 1, 2016 13:55 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Do the skulls have negatively-geared properties? I don't know, where could I look up Warren Truss' property portfolio?
|
# ¿ May 1, 2016 14:19 |
|
Frogmanv2 posted:Why do you last names for males but first names for females? Dehumanises men so they're easier to inter In Mal's Opinion.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 01:05 |
|
Negligent posted:Anything anyone posts on social media must be the literal truth. Negligent is an idiot.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 03:37 |
|
Maybe having a second leash on Australian ambitions for war would be a good thing?
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 05:36 |
|
High court even recently said marriages marriages of convenience were just as valid as any other marriage, so you're completely in the clear if you go that route. e:Woops federal court. WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 06:32 on May 2, 2016 |
# ¿ May 2, 2016 06:23 |
|
Have you been together long enough to be de facto? https://www.border.gov.au/about/corporate/information/fact-sheets/35relationship WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 06:44 on May 2, 2016 |
# ¿ May 2, 2016 06:42 |
|
Les Affaires posted:Does the bridging visa grant working rights in the meantime? Serrath posted:Yes it grants all rights of perm residence. It's a visa in lieu of PR Not entirely true. It looks like it depends on what restrictions are already on your visa. But even if the bridging visa restricts your working rights, you an apply for that to be changed if you can show financial hardship. https://www.border.gov.au/Trav/Visa-1/010-
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 07:04 |
|
I remember the US delayed a few weapons shipments to Israel during the 2014 Gaza invasion. I would have thought it pretty commonplace when you were sending a message you weren't supportive of the military action.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 07:49 |
|
quote:DON’T let Barnaby Joyce fool you. He might have convinced many he is a clumsy backwoods chump but he most certainly isn’t.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 08:32 |
|
LibertyCat posted:and as I keep saying, we're being taken for fools and should just back out of the Refugee convention. This isn't WW2. So these other countries should be made to take them while not being party to the convention, and we should pull out of the convention...so that we don't have to take them?
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 13:20 |
|
LibertyCat posted:Other countries should not be able to put their fingers in their ears and go "you signed that bit of paper, you take em, we're just gonna let them travel through our borders and there's nothing you can do nyah nyah nyah" Why? We signed the bit of paper because we thought that refugees should be protected.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 13:30 |
|
LibertyCat posted:Anything involving Agenda 21 Over-reached. e:I can't imagine why someone would pretend to be dumb in the hopes that someone else thinks they're stupid when they're only pretending, but I'll console myself with the hope that's what's happened and you're not actually this hosed in the head. WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 13:46 on May 2, 2016 |
# ¿ May 2, 2016 13:44 |
|
My brother said when he was in Bosnia you could tell which abandoned houses you'd be safe from landmines to squat in, because there would be graffiti on the inside. What are some suggestions for how we could tell which abandoned houses in Australia would be free from landmines? I think a really nice glass bong that's been dropped and smashed. WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 14:02 on May 2, 2016 |
# ¿ May 2, 2016 14:00 |
|
If Australia was invaded wouldn't our property market crash?
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 15:00 |
|
Seagull posted:how many more numbered agendas can we get to scare libertarians, i love them As many as there are multiples of 3.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 15:34 |
|
Doesn't calling something a freedom of navigation exercise sort of defeat the purpose of a freedom of navigation exercise?
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 03:37 |
|
BCR posted:It makes the Chinese look bad if something happens to the ship that loudly and clearly announced what its doing, peacefully and in international waters. Right, but wouldn't you be better off not provoking the reaction and hoping they either let it go through without issue, or interfere anyway at which point you are acting from a stronger position to criticise them?
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 03:45 |
|
Negligent posted:Essential asked "for future purchases investors can only claim tax deductions for investments in newly built homes" 26 neither know, approve or disapprove? That seems like it could only be a good thing for the ALP.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 06:45 |
|
Can't even edit the audio properly, it has an abrupt cut whenever Sharten speaks.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 07:57 |
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Uni fee deregulation now deader than herpes infected CCAARRP. But it'll just keep coming back.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 11:19 |
|
Do we know if these kids going to be stripped of worker's compensation for injuries a la the Green Army too?
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 14:14 |
|
FDR implemented Make-Work projects, I'm sure you lefties would have been in favour of the New Deal at the time
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 14:16 |
|
LibertyCat posted:Raising Newstart does not mean "fiddly office poo poo" will get done. Yeah, they might even have to hire someone to do that job! I think you might be onto something.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 14:32 |
|
Tokamak posted:Negligent has been melting down more than usual lately. Maybe this means that Bill Shorten is going to become prime minister. He feels threatened by the new worst poster. I hope LibertyCat undergoes the same transformation as Graic and Negligent can reclaim the title.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 14:45 |
|
Negligent posted:this was a v good night really I have them at 3.30:1 actually.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 14:50 |
|
EvilElmo posted:I've said it before, but if anyone ever asks why oppositions don't release policy before an election, this is why. I can't believe you're not even a ~change from within~ Labor type, you literally love their lovely small target neoliberal strategies. ^What a great filter.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 14:53 |
|
EvilElmo posted:You can do a lot more in Government than you can in opposition. As a Greens voter you're probably not aware of that. But Labor usually steal Liberal policies and water them down. When they're in government they're too scared of losing government to do anything, when they're in opposition they're too scared of not winning government to do anything. It's not a strategy, it's just reaction.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 15:12 |
|
EvilElmo posted:No. Yes. e: Except it's really not that wrong. If the extent the Libs have stolen policy from Labor is being used as the baseline for it, then Labor steal and back Liberal policy to a far greater extent than the reverse. WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 15:21 on May 3, 2016 |
# ¿ May 3, 2016 15:18 |
|
Didn't Hockey say the same thing about education and was mauled for it? Why the gently caress would Turnbull think that was a good thing to say? Bill Shorten is going to be PM.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 04:05 |
|
Paul Kaaaaaarp.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 04:16 |
|
https://twitter.com/braddybb/status/727636373637734400
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 06:17 |
|
I want a Daily Telegraph ScoMo tazo so bad now.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 07:00 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 07:12 |
|
EvilElmo posted:Unlike the posters here, I will actually answer the question. I would vote Green if the ALP vanished tomorrow. God you're such a fuckhead. No one here's a tree tory.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 12:36 |
|
Because it's a stupid question. You're building into the scenario that Liberal lite policy is the only way to win government for the ALP. e: As you've just said, even a rusted on Labor voter like yourself would switch to the Greens if the ALP were to disappear.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 12:40 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 16:08 |
|
EvilElmo posted:Agree on the last part. Remind us again who scrapped all that progress because they were scared they'd lose government?
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 13:05 |