|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 01:17 |
|
|
i wonder if donald trump will win the democratic primary
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
I can't believe we have 2 1/2 months still left in this death march
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 19:27
|
|
|
I definitely trust Chevy.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
Al! posted:I can't believe we have 2 1/2 months still left in this death march
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
For the first time the GOP thread is leading the dem one. The backs of the bernouts are finally broken
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
so does bernie officially concede here? 
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Mo_Steel posted:so does bernie officially concede here? Bernie is a waste.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
Is Hillary ahead of Bernie in the Indiana polls?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:Bernie is a waste. You're a waste.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
Al! posted:I can't believe we have 2 1/2 months still left in this death march At this point Hillary pulling a Vince Foster on Sanders should be considered a mercy killing.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:At this point Hillary pulling a Vince Foster on Sanders should be considered a mercy killing. Well, she already hosed him - so she's halfway there
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Dr_0ctag0n posted:You're a waste. no u
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
I will be voting for Hillary Clinton for President of the United States in just over 189 days.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Is Hillary ahead of Bernie in the Indiana polls? Yes. And not that it matters, but Indiana is probably the most likely place to see a repeat of Michigan were Bernie beats the polls. It's an open primary in a state with a lot of manufacturing jobs and not a lot of black people.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 01:28
|
|
|
Abisteen posted:I will be voting for Hillary Clinton for President of the United States in just over 189 days. Black voters get to vote for her in 191 days. I saw it on a flyer.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:For the first time the GOP thread is leading the dem one. The backs of the bernouts are finally broken the dem threads are just hillary circlejerks though
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
Indiana is an open primary full of white people and Bernie will still probably lose
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 02:14
|
|
|
win or lose, bernie's gonna keep pushing his "superdelegates are good if you back me" message
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
Al! posted:I can't believe we have 2 1/2 months still left in this death march All Sanders needs is to have a rally that gets hashtagged #Sandersdeathmarch and he will have marked his campaign with both the failures of Hillary 08 and Romney 12.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:win or lose, bernie's gonna keep pushing his "superdelegates are good if you back me" message Has he ever actually said this?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Rand alPaul posted:Has he ever actually said this? He's said they should back him, but probably not that they're good.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
He said they should back the winner of the state they represent.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:He's said they should back him, but probably not that they're good. Yeah that's what I figured, the only people actually defending the superdelegate system have been HRC and her people along the lines of "Barack Obama *should* have a say in who is the Democratic Nominee!" like he doesn't already wield huge influence in the process.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 04:19
|
|
|
Rand alPaul posted:Yeah that's what I figured, the only people actually defending the superdelegate system have been HRC and her people along the lines of "Barack Obama *should* have a say in who is the Democratic Nominee!" like he doesn't already wield huge influence in the process. Superdelegates are just a fail-safe in case something goes completely off the rails in the primaries. Like not being obligated to nominate someone just indicted for murder or Donald Trump or something. In the vast majority of cases, they should (and do) go along with the choice of the rest of the delegates. Superdelegates are a non-issue that losing candidates whine about every four years.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 04:25
|
|
|
Superdelegates might help prevent a thing that... bear with me here, this is entirely theoretical--
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 04:45
|
|
|
Tetracube posted:the dem threads are just hillary circlejerks though She's the dem nominee, what do you expect.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 05:29
|
|
|
According to isidewith.com I'm 97% with Bernie and 93% with both Stein and Clinton. I'm going to have an epic multi-page meltdown when the candidate I prefer by 4% is not selected by democracy.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
Sebadoh Gigante posted:He said they should back the winner of the state they represent. *unless they're from a state Hillary won, in which case they should look at head to head polls.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 06:16
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:*unless they're from a state Hillary won, in which case they should look at head to head polls. lol that made me think, do they ever do head to head general election polls on a state level? If they did I bet Hillary would do better in Virginia and NC, and do more to build towards the democratic party's long term goal of turning the entire eastern seaboard blue.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 06:37
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:Superdelegates are just a fail-safe in case something goes completely off the rails in the primaries. Like not being obligated to nominate someone just indicted for murder or Donald Trump or something. In the vast majority of cases, they should (and do) go along with the choice of the rest of the delegates. Look at this autist enthusiastically take a poo poo on voters.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 07:14
|
|
|
Sebadoh Gigante posted:lol that made me think, do they ever do head to head general election polls on a state level? If they did I bet Hillary would do better in Virginia and NC, and do more to build towards the democratic party's long term goal of turning the entire eastern seaboard blue. PPP probably has in NC.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 07:35
|
|
|
Pick posted:Superdelegates might help prevent a thing that... bear with me here, this is entirely theoretical-- https://youtu.be/XtuWiHYmr4U 5 minutes in
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 07:52
|
|
|
You guys ready to 'Suck It Down' as 'Sanders Is Going To Make You His Bitch', when he wins Indiana by Alaska margins today? 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 10:50
|
|
|
ANGRYGREEK posted:You guys ready to 'Suck It Down' as 'Sanders Is Going To Make You His Bitch', when he wins Indiana by Alaska margins today? *starts chanting TOXX TOXX TOXX*
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:39
|
|
|
ScrubLeague posted:According to isidewith.com I'm 97% with Bernie and 93% with both Stein and Clinton. I'm going to have an epic multi-page meltdown when the candidate I prefer by 4% is not selected by democracy. But what if she's lying
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:49
|
|
|
Sir Tonk posted:But what if she's lying she is and she is actually worse than trump / hitler combined #neverhillary
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:50
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Look at this autist enthusiastically take a poo poo on voters. Voters getting to select a candidate for a political party is a privilege, not a right. The party is not obligated to have any votes or ask anyone's opinion before selecting a candidate. Its a private organization and can do whatever it wants. They're not "making GBS threads on voters" because there was never any promise or expectation that the results of the votes would be binding. Looks like your high horse had broken legs.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:09
|
|
|
mmmm can't wait to drink the tears of all those fucks at /r/hillaryclinton as their weep over the results tonight  mmmmm going to taste so good 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 01:17 |
|
|
we hoosiers are just happy someone is paying attention to us for once 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:18
|
|
