|
vodkat posted:i use folding all the time op because gently caress splitting all of my lovely html parsing code into separate files, better to keep that garbage contained wish your posting was contained 2 this thread lmao
|
#
?
May 11, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 02:31 |
|
|
just like the Japanese masters, I fold my code hundreds of time to ensure it is as strong as possible.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
all the time op. although in C# it's called Aggregate.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2016 19:54
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:just like the Japanese masters, I fold my code hundreds of time to ensure it is as strong as possible.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
I fold org-mode files but not code.Shaggar posted:just like the Japanese masters, I fold my code hundreds of time to ensure it is as strong as possible. It's impossible to fold code more than 7 times
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
one thousand coded cranes
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2016 03:40
|
|
|
tazjin posted:It's impossible to fold code more than 7 times
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2016 08:38
|
|
|
im looking at the word fold over and over and its weird. fold. fold.
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2016 10:29
|
|
|
LP0 ON FIRE posted:my theory is, if you need to fold your code, then your code is too complex and needs to be split into methods/functions and different files "if you X then your code is too complex and needs to be refactored" turns out to be true for all "X" according to stackexchange
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2016 10:31
|
|
|
all code is poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 06:22
|
|
|
crusader_complex posted:im looking at the word fold over and over and its weird. fold. fold. flod
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 15:49
|
|
|
Interesting topic. I've never really thought about it as a sign of poor code quality and the plain utility seems like it should override such vague considerations. I guess if you are a dyed in the wool OO acolyte who insists on X amount of lines per individucal file you could get caught up with this bug if you ban people from using it you will just annoy a lot of FP programmers. Jeff Atwood had some interesting thoughts on the matter: hen you join a team, it's important to bend your preferences a little to accommodate the generally accepted coding practices of that team. Not everyone has to agree on every miniscule detail of the code, of course, but it's a good idea to dicuss it with your team and decide on overall approaches and philosophy beforehand. It promotes team harmony, and more than that, it's just common courtesy. As they say, when in Rome, do as the Romans do. I've always been wary of cowboy coders who rolled into an ongoing project on fresh horses and immediately started dictating terms. It's a very short trip indeed from there to Who Wrote This Crap, and the predictable, inevitable finger-pointing at the foolhardy programmers who came before you begins. Don't be that guy or gal. Work with your team, not against it. Folding is used to sweep code under the rug. Got a bunch of boring boilerplate code that makes your eyes water? A slew of ugly, gnarly code that nobody in their right mind wants to look at? Hide it in a region and fold that sucker into oblivion! Problem solved, right? Hardly. Your project is now full of crappy code that you can't see. That's worse. Much worse! Code that hides from you is code that will rot in the most putrescent and painful way possible. Your code should be front and center at all times -- exposed to as many programmers' eyes, and as much healing light, as possible. Folding is used to mask excessive length. The presence of folded code can lull developers into a false sense of what clean code looks like. Under the cover of folding, you can end up writing long, horrible spaghetti code blocks. If the code needs the crutch of folding to look organized, it's bad code. Folding can hide deficiencies in your editor. The presence of so-called "standard" boilerplate regions like "Public Constructors" and "Public Properties" and "Events" is not a feature. It's a bug. The editor should automatically offer to fold up these common structural blocks for you! I'm continually amazed that programmers spend time doing this scutwork when they could be writing useful code. Or at least demanding a smarter code editor. I urge developers to write code that doesn't need folding to be readable, clear, and concise. I'm sure there are sane uses for code folding out there somewhere, but I rarely see them. I hope everyone found this post informative.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
Always fold because if you're coding you've already lost
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
power botton posted:Always fold because if you're coding you've already lost
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:all the time op. although in C# it's called Aggregate. Why does C# have weird names for all its functional programming constructs anyway I can't believe I spent a year of my life saying "oh yeah, I'll call Enumerable.Select here. This is a normal name for this function. I can see why it's called this and not Map."
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 21:27
|
|
|
nrook posted:Why does C# have weird names for all its functional programming constructs anyway because monads
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
nrook posted:Why does C# have weird names for all its functional programming constructs anyway probably to make it sounds like an sql query
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
i never fold ever, and in fact hate those who do
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
Power Ambient posted:lol if you ever have so much code in one file that you need to fold it
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
linq takes names more from sql than dumb math poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
hence select, where, aggregate instead of map, filter, fold
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
linq more like stinq
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
Bloody posted:hence select, where, aggregate instead of map, filter, fold select where you fold your aggregated filter maps (it's your butt lmao)
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2016 15:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 02:31 |
|
|
suffix posted:every time i encounter a file where some idiot has added fold markers i waste a minute finding the 'open all' shortcut Control+M, Control+S
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 14:04
|
|
