|
Will the dlc likely get packaged or discounted at some point?
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 23:09 |
|
|
In my current tiny game everyone is green or teal happy face with me. 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
In my current game I was a declared friend of Cleopatra who then proceeds to invade a commercial city state I'm suzerain of. The only option I seem to have available in her diplomacy screen is trade. Is there anything I can do because this seems pretty hosed up.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2017 08:20
|
|
|
Gort posted:You can declare war on her after she takes the city, for a reduced warmonger cost. After the friendship wears off? She took the city and I only have the make deal option.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2017 10:14
|
|
|
Could implement the SMAC thing where building a settler in a 1 population city abandons it. Just need a little pop-up to make sure noobs don't do it accidentally.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 22:16
|
|
|
Try waiting a little bit after you save and then exit to the main menu before exiting the game.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
I like the game and I like it 100x more than base Civ V.
|
|
#
¿
May 1, 2017 07:18
|
|
|
The White Dragon posted:The thing Civ 6 needs to bring back is moving into hills, forest, or across river tiles with your remaining move points instead of forcing you to wait/end turn. Why?
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2017 06:40
|
|
|
The White Dragon posted:Because making you unable to severely limits both your tactical options (and, by extension, the AI's capacity to move units effectively), and it completely removes the puzzle aspect of maximizing your movement points. It opens up more options than it removes.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2017 08:37
|
|
|
The White Dragon posted:please explain in more words than "it opens up more options than it removes" Your decisions are more impactful if terrain is more important.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2017 10:27
|
|
|
Niwrad posted:They should just give you more movement as eras progress. It's weird that units get better at everything as the game progresses but speed. Takes like 30 turns to get an army from one side of the map to the other late in the game. That's exactly what happens with your roads getting better each age??
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
theres a will theres moe posted:I agree. I also think that it's stupid that you have to choose where to put them. IMO civ didn't need the puzzle minigame element of physically arranging assets in each city. It is more an annoyance than a challenge and it only takes one errant click to irreversibly gently caress up a city's production forever. Load an autosave.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
It does spread passively. There are arrows showing you the pressure under the religion lens I think.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I want a new Master of Magic with hexes and army combat as well as traditional technologies and magic tech and have end game units be combinations of both. Fast flying jet's with paratrooper wizards that shoot lightning bolts at infantry Have you played Age of Wonders 3? No jets but it's good.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Do Greece get a hill bias start? Everyone says the acropolis is poo poo because you lose a valuable hill but anytime I play Greece I seem to get a lot of starting hills.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2017 07:14
|
|
|
Dammit I was hoping for Ethiopia/Aksum. Egypt 2 is lame.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2017 03:04
|
|
|
homullus posted:Aksum would have been great too, but if you know about Aksum, you should feel bad about calling Kush/Nubia "Egypt 2." I regret nothing.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2017 04:58
|
|
|
What are those Spain buffs though lol
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
I really don't like any of the scaling costs of settlers/districts/builders.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
Gaius Marius posted:The point is that the Roman empire was a vast territory that encompassed thousands of miles and millions of people and whose center of power only remained in Rome for a short period compared to the vast length of time it existed. Every game with Rome has the civ representing the classical empire of Augustus and Trajan. Saying it's a representative of a separate polity that existed a thousand years later after Mass migrations and annexations on the peninsula is ridiculous. It's like saying the US shouldn't be in since there's already Cherokee in the game. The civs generally represent cultural centers through time and are named for when they were most influential/unified/notable whatever. Rome/Italy works exactly the same as Aztec/Mexico, Classical Greece/Greece, Persia/Iran or 5000 years of dynamic Chinese or Indian history etc.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Taear posted:Having Rome be representative of Italy just feels wrong to me. Rome is most of Europe, it's not just Italy. Even if that's where it started! Does England represent Canada? I don't see how associating Rome with Italy is weird at all.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 07:55
|
|
|
Rather than pointless community crap, they're putting all their resources towards the amazing expansion that will make this the best Civ ever. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 08:47
|
|
|
Poil posted:Do they even have a soulless and fun hating marketing department, that for some reason seems to be out to sabotage everything, like other companies do? They hosed up the marketing and dlc structure for Tyranny.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
Kalko posted:My favorite was Detailed Worlds but it broke in the previous patch; no water resources would spawn. I did a quick search for other random map generators but I can't find any either, which is a shame because the default map gen makes really bland maps. I wondered what was going on.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 23, 2017 08:17
|
|
|
Space orcs vs space paladins is the lamest poo poo imaginable.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2017 08:35
|
|
|
Efexeye posted:what's that got to do with the price of tea in china GalCiv.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Settlers are too expensive and I don't see any point in scaling costs either. The early game should be a land grab.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
The White Dragon posted:it is. grabbing your enemies' land with archers I usually play peacenik zen India, wars of aggression are immoral 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 6, 2017 02:15
|
|
|
Can't wait to get +5% culture and science in cities with a governer. Exciting stuff.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2017 03:52
|
|
|
So do the polders let you build land bridges?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2017 00:59
|
|
|
It's dumb they keep ignoring actual North American civilization Mississippians in favour of nomadic hunter/gatherer tribes.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
Negrostrike posted:Just pretend Civ is some alternate reality where they settle down during the Neolithic. It's crazy the Inca aren't a core civ.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2017 02:57
|
|
|
I like the leader art.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 26, 2017 01:03
|
|
|
My biggest issue at the moment is just getting a good, fun starting position. 80% of my games I give up on after 20 minutes because I'm on a tiny island/I'm the only player on a vast continent/there are no hills or mountains anywhere near me/there are no decent expand spots/I'm in a spot that directly undermines my civs abilities.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 1, 2018 00:51
|
|
|
Goddamit. Civ's been defaulting to my integrated graphics for the last year without me realising. I just assumed it ran like poo poo on my laptop 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2018 08:44
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnZPWuKpkXk Statue of Liberty gives you settlers apparently. 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2018 03:48
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:I'm not sure why that's confusing It makes sense, just not sure how useful late industrial era settlers are.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2018 04:27
|
|
|
Mapuche, Scotland and Zulu as the final three might actually get me to hold off on the expansion. Would suggest they're going to continue with dlc civs as well I guess.
Ratios and Tendency fucked around with this message at 01:52 on Jan 17, 2018 |
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2018 01:47
|
|
|
Zulily Zoetrope posted:...Why? They're saving civs I'm interested in and including ones that I'm not. Zulus go even further into insulting given Africa's pathetic representation so far.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2018 02:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 23:09 |
|
|
Zulily Zoetrope posted:I guess I mean, which civs are the obvious DLC-bait, given this information? The Zulu and Celts would be near the top of my list of civs that I could see being saved for DLC. I guess Ottomans, Byzantium, Canada? The only rationale that I can see for including Mapuche over Inca is because you're saving Inca for dlc.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2018 03:33
|
|