|
Gamerofthegame posted:not really tbh it was pretty unbalanced everywhere I didn't really play the game that much but heard friends gush over it, what were some examples?
|
#
¿
May 15, 2016 04:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 23:14 |
|
|
They should add some sort of (possibly very basic) logistics systems for armies if they're doing the 1 unit per tile, it would create some interesting choices in how you advance on a front.
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2016 05:51
|
|
|
Should have had hitler in the list 30 times
|
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
Have they said anything about the effects of the cassus belli system in multiplayer? Like it doesn't matter much who or when I war against in multiplayer, unless there's some sort of ingame effects since obviously players dont use a diplomacy system.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
How intensive is it going to be? I ran civ 5 fine but my computers getting olddd
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
Any word yet if the ai diplomacy is functional in multiplayer? In 5 we just usually played with only humans but it would be nice to have some functioning ai from time to time
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
Eiba posted:So is there any penalty at all to discourage infinite city spam? Everything I keep reading suggests that tall is the weaker option in this, and even going tall will be 6 or 7 cities as opposed to 10 to 13.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2016 04:49
|
|
|
what was bad about smac?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
lots of people saying the ai looks pretty bad, not that 5 was too hot. At least it'll be themed in a neat way
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
Was quill specializing in science to go that fast? The times seem similar to civ 5 where with Babylon you could be really far ahead pretty quick in prince.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2016 19:38
|
|
|
Most importantly the strategic view in 6 looks amazzzing compared to 5, and close enough to the regular map that it doesn't look too jarring. I used it slot in 5 due to playing a lot on a laptop and it always took a bit to get used to the visual change between the iconography and the way the units were shown in strategic view
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
Still getting used to the game, how do I use for Japan for the best effect? I'm not quite sure how the adjacency bonus works for them
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2016 02:57
|
|
|
ThisIsNoZaku posted:Normally, districts gain +1 output for every 2 other districts next to them. Japan gets +1 for every adjacent district (possibly stacking with the normal bonus, the wording suggests it does but I haven't checked) so they're encouraged to make super build up cities. Ah ok thanks
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2016 04:35
|
|
|
Hmm so does this make Japan better or worse?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2016 08:36
|
|
|
Honestly there's not much of a difference between no victories (paradox excluding stellaris as mentioned above) and a victory that is trivially easy (civ 6 deity once you have built walls)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2017 22:18
|
|
|
why the hell is there a continue button in the game in order to reach the main menu
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
Judge Schnoopy posted:I've read some crazy strategies about rushing science victory in 150 turns. It abuses chopping for rushing construction of everything and requires a lot of forests / jungles. 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2018 22:01
|
|
|
He’s pretty drat good. No sure if this is optimal, but played Rome, built the government plaza and the building that gives +50 settlers, the policy card for another +50, and of course magnus with the bonus to chops and no pop loss from settlers. Chopped with a bunch of builders all in the same turn and got 8 settlers out in the same turn, with no pop loss from and 8 pop city. Seems good!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2018 19:00
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 23:14 |
|
|
The funny thing is once those 8 settlers made cities, it also created builders that then chopped 8 more settlers (after a handful of turns growing to pop 2). I could have moved Magnus around to maximize it I think? But I forgot.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2018 06:03
|
|
