|
A perfectly fair tweet.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 04:38 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 08:55 |
|
I'm glad you're all having a good time talking about the random idiot another poster knows. Cool thread
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 04:56 |
|
Get this: I saw a guy on the train the other day and he said he is thinking of voting for the LNP. Funny loving poo poo. He was wearing an unfashionable brand of T-Shirt and was reading a book my Neal Stephenson.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 04:57 |
|
Kat Delacour posted:I haven't had a landline phone in 3 years and the silence is definitely golden. I don't even own a television.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 04:59 |
|
Starshark posted:Hey Amethyst why don't you gently caress off to yospos where no-one likes you instead of posting here where no-one likes you? I'd rather come in occasionally here and point out what a bunch of fail losers you all are.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 05:05 |
|
Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt your 2 page long laff fest about some guy we don't know and who has no influence on anything. He is probably aligned with some twitter faction you dislike, lol! Maybe cartoon will do another media copy/paste dump for you all to scroll past in the meantime. I'll leave you all be to continue the sensible political forum.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 05:06 |
|
Lid posted:What's your opinjon on the Safe Schools program and the criticism directed at it? It's a witch hunt that wouldn't have gone anywhere if the LNP wasn't a dysfunctional bunch of idiots beholden to extremists. What did you expect me to say, here?
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 05:08 |
|
In the mean time, you all shifted your feet awkwardly in silence when the obvious homophobia and inappropriateness of the chaser stunt became clear, ignoring all of the praise the people who did it had just received. What do you think of that?
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 05:10 |
|
starkebn posted:Maybe I'm missing what's homophobic about it? *scratches head* Not sure I see what's homophobic about this? Anyone care to enlighten me?
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 05:18 |
|
Frogfingers posted:Don't be wilfully dense, they repurposed the stupid phrases from examples of actual "wicked vans" to make a point. Ok, what point is worth putting that kind of thing in a public place, or broadcasting it? "<public figure> sucks dick and is gay" isn't the kind of thing you should throw around for a joke. The shallow characterization of Free Speech they are ostensibly critiquing here is a straw man, and Leyonhjelm is well within reason to call that poo poo out.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 05:27 |
|
starkebn posted:How is saying Leyjonhelm might like a cock in his mouth in any way homophobic? You can't just use the term to mean something it doesn't because you might think it is a good comeback against those dastardly SJWs Now THIS is willfully dense.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:10 |
|
starkebn posted:Talking about a homosexual act without a moral judgement of it is not homophobic Ok, you cocksucking homo. e: I felt bad typing the above. lol. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:43 |
|
Recoome posted:Nice meltdown Amethyst I am calm and cool as a lake, in actual fact. It is you, the dumb one, who is melting down.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:48 |
|
I'm sure every reasonable person can see both sides of the argument here, no need to clarify it further. The only thing that remains is whether or not you think the offensiveness inherent in the chaser joke is proportionate to the point being made.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:49 |
|
Snod. posted:Can we swap Amethyst for LibertyCat? Can you swap your bed for a grave?
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:51 |
|
Nice non sequitur, I guess.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:53 |
|
QUACKTASTIC posted:The Chaser is still pretty poo poo though. Actually the election desk is stupid and boring. Too many cooks. e: wait I misread this lol.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:53 |
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:
Ah yes, this is completely analogous to the situation at hand.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:56 |
|
Hmmm *steeples fingers*. I guess you could say that calling someone a cock sucker loudly, in public, may be construed as homophobic, given certain contingencies. But consider this: what if you didn't call them a cock sucker loudly, or in public, but in a private situation with personally agreed upon standards of civility? Hmmmm?
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:57 |
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:As much as this? Why do you think I edited that comment
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 06:59 |
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:You didn't edit it in a way that made it any better. I did, actually. You are an automaton moron if you need me to explain why.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:01 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:It's literally, "How would you like it if someone did that to you?" nothing more. You can't strip the moral content from "This fag would look great with a cock in his mouth". Sorry.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:04 |
|
Frogfingers posted:Irony has been so long dead nobody understands ironic punishments any more. Everyone understands, you idiot. The debate has moved well past that point.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:05 |
|
Rolling your eyes and talking about how no one understands the deep irony of "how do you like it" for all the world to admire your wisdom is one of the most pathetic things I can imagine.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:06 |
|
Frogfingers posted:Buddy you've been arguing for nearly 3 pages about a phantom gay joke, I'm telling you what the skit was and what it wasn't. You aren't listening to reason, what more can I do? You need to learn to read. Literally nobody in this thread doesn't get the joke. You don't need to explain it to anyone. That doesn't invalidate the critique.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:11 |
|
MonoAus posted:Perhaps people who are unclear about what the joke was should watch the segment. Seems like if you need it explained, you haven't seen it. Cool, another unbelievably pompous illustration of the dunning kruger affect hemming and hawing over the inscrutable nature of "how do you like it huh"
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:12 |
|
This thread is a mental wasteland
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:13 |
|
MonoAus posted:"This fag would look great with a cock in his mouth" was not the joke and wouldn't work for this situation, it would be homophobic and not show DL as a hypocrite. If you keep bringing up incorrect equivalencies then everyone will assume you don't understand. It doesn't matter if it "wasn't the joke". It was a part of the joke. If you really think there is a huge gulf between what I said, and this: then you need to be shipped off to a re-education camp
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:16 |
|
Periphery posted:I believe you idiots will find that the Wicked slogan was referring to roosters when it said cock. Maybe Cathat really likes eating red rooster? lol
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:17 |
|
Frogfingers posted:Yes it does. Whatever your "critique" is comes from a place of you not knowing what the gently caress you're talking about. Actually, it is you , who are the dummy. Got 'em
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:18 |
|
hooman posted:
????? Van Badham is a skilled columnist.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:21 |
|
starkebn posted:I read that article and 'tactical voting' just sounds like a gamble and worth so little you shouldn't bother Yeah it's dumb. Vote with your heart. 11th dimensional chess on the ballot paper isn't going to achieve anything but long term cynicism.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:26 |
|
Frogfingers posted:I thought it was safe to come out of hiding when I saw that mills and ratbag were gone. Evidently not. Yeah I'm sure those guys are eagerly lurking in the shadows waiting to pounce as soon as *squints* FrogFingers returns. lmfao
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 07:32 |
|
Recoome posted:lol Lol, unsubstantiated accusations are incredibly funny.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 08:10 |
|
I hear Recoome attends Simply Red concerts on the reg
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2016 08:10 |
|
drat. I need to move to Melbourne.
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2016 11:01 |
|
back to 57/57
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2016 11:15 |
|
come onnnnnn you gently caress
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2016 11:20 |
|
65/60 to the LNP
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2016 11:46 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 08:55 |
|
Quasimango posted:Thisisfine.jpg Well poo poo. So much for the new rules.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2016 02:43 |