|
Adix posted:i didn't know I could feel 'triggered' until I found this thread
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:04 |
|
|
skype for business and blue jeans are very bad ive never had issues with webex but i only ever do those with other companies, we dont have it we used to have gotomeeting and it always just worked but we stopped using that now
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
Agile Vector posted:loving blue jeans is when i first joined we had like 5 active systems, blue jeans being the "main" one we're now down to blue jeans and skype for business, the plan is to phase out blue jeans but about 10% of my internal conferences are still on it
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
blue jeans is really bad
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
KoRMaK posted:skype for business is ok if you only ever chat and teleconference. the chat is awful what the gently caress are you talking about i bet it tries to establish as SIP call for each block of text and half the time it fails for some reason its mind boggling how unreliably it delivers text
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
the screen sharing and audio are good i will admit
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 03:11
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:yeah that would make it worthless. need to have a legit client. both slack and hipchat have legit clients, as well as mobile clients that actually work and synchronize messages across all clients and even know to only push notifications to your phone when youre away from your computer, what a concept
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
KoRMaK posted:in my expierience, if I send an IM while somoene has a green dot next to their name then they get the message. if not, they get it via email hours later. half the time i send an IM in my company I get a spinny wheel and it never actually goes through or it goes through and then i get a bounceback message a minute or two later saying it timed out or something 1-on-1 calls, group calls, screensharing and skype for business meeetings work almost flawlessly though 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 04:29
|
|
|
KoRMaK posted:lol that sounds like some idiot or some group of idiots set it up poorly if everything didn't work i would blame the idiots, but why JUST IM?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
same guy that joins every meeting both via phone and computer without disabling the built-in mic on his laptop, causing a feedback loop
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
Powerful Two-Hander posted:* this was the best, somehow in an attempt to conference someone in the host dialled into someones voicemail so then they recorded the entire meeting and then got a "warning, this message is too long, please hang up, please hang up..." on repeat blasted out at everyone and probably hosed that persons voicemail up completely (good because voicemail is worthless) we've had people put the conference bridge on hold instead of mute from europe so it starts blasting "please wait, your call is important to us" or whatever the gently caress in german this has happened multiple times
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2016 06:31
|
|
|
Arcsech posted:Honestly probably the most reliable method if you only have two endpoints
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2016 07:16
|
|
|
we scheduled a bluejeans meeting this morning because someone has used bluejeans with this customer previously and we didn't want to give them yet another conferencing system to fumble around with half of the customer side attendees couldnt get it to work, we switched to skype for business, lost 15 minutes doing this
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2016 16:57
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:did you go from your skype 4 business 2 their skype 4 business or did they come in on some external 3rd party thing that connects to ur skype 4 business? I haven't done much research on it but seems to me the ability to have connectivity between organizations who are both using skype 4 business would be good. the customer used their own Skype for business which was easy to connect to but trying to present was a struggle, even after they explicitly made me a "presenter" instead of an "attendee", which is the default permission for someone outside your organization lost more time dealing with that also gently caress who ever's idea it was to use blue jeans when the customer uses skype for business like we do normally
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:all companies that would list telecoms as their primary focus are unbelievably awful at IT that's because telecoms are run by dumb as gently caress people
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2016 06:26
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:use both, garbage quality pstn connection with a 20 year old phone, and then slightly delayed laptop microphone with the setting to play audio back through the speakers turned on. cell phone is worse quality than an old landline due to the more aggressive compression an older cell phone (so it doesn't have dual mics for noise cancelling) outside during a windy day and never mute it
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
Bloody posted:lol if you don't start the call that way then just jack off for the rest of the duration
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:bluejeans always defaults to video on, so you gotta make sure you turn it off every time you join a meeting. only on mobile apps, desktop app doesn't Shaggar posted:wow blue jeans sounds like a piece of poo poo it's really bad
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2016 11:08
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:Architect is taking a call while riding his bicycle. Hear wind and traffic. lol
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2016 09:43
|
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:death to all forms of conference calling technology
|
|
#
¿
Aug 25, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i've been aware for a while now that most of our meetings hosted through bluejeans are totally open to the public, you just need to know the meeting name. the meeting name is usually first letter of first name + lastname. lol skype for business at least gives an audible alert to the meeting if someone from outside your organization that didn't specifically get an invite joins a meeting
|
|
#
¿
Aug 29, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:my only problem with skype for business online business 2 business meetings is that everyone uses their computer for audio which exposes you to loads of bad built in mics and poor internet connections. built in mics in laptops are still much better quality than dialing in with your phone the problem i see too often is people leaving the built in mic on their laptop on while simultaneously dialing in on their deskphone for nice feedback loops
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
had two back to back skype for business meetings today first one was running a few minutes over so people for the second meeting joined as the first one was finishing new attendees had full audio, but were unable to see desktop screen sharing and original remaining presenters had to leave and rejoin for them to be able to see anything
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:yeah. I just now realized I can IM people who also have skype for b in other orgs. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:it cannot handle text chat if you have more than one device. the use case of starting a chat on a phone and then getting back to your desk and wanting to continue it is not one they considered. it cant even handle text chat if you have one device
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
Mad Wack posted:Our 25 person conf call once got to listen to a VP order a shamrock shake from a mcdonalds drive thru, taste it, and send it back lol
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2016 04:38
|
|
|
my DECT headset at work has really nice range so sometimes i take shits while on calls and get paranoid about whether or not mute is actually on
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
Iridium posted:we have 10 minutes to go and have not addressed the purpose of this meeting. meetings exist to justify their own existence
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2016 06:10
|
|
|
recorded meetings are always the best because 99% of the time they'll never be rewatched and then 1% of the time they will they're be terrible quality with all the distractions a disorganized conference call can have
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:company has two locations about 120 miles apart, spent a load of money turning a room in one office into a video conference room, didn't buy anything for the other office. one guy travels between the two sites three days a week to sit at a desk and work on email, and maybe once a month has to have a face-to-face meeting. that dude better have a side piece he's banging near the other office and uses the travel as an excuse for his wife
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 22:24
|
|
|
jammyozzy posted:A guy in my office has Skype set up on his iPhone and, inexplicably, his iPad too. the mobile client is really bad
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
i seriously suspect lync/skype for business establishes a SIP session for each IM conversation
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:lmao
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2016 05:32
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:someone doesn't realize they aren't muted and is sighing REALLY loudly like every 30 seconds my coworker who lives 1500 miles from me never mutes himself on any of our group calls and loves to hum to himself or react audibly to whatever he's reading instead of paying attention to the meeting
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:10am real time.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
Bloody posted:I blew the mind of a young engineering colleague recently by alt tabbing. lol
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2016 03:19
|
|
|
Necronomoticon posted:is the IM support in office 365 any decent? lol
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2016 21:34
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:*joins webex* "hey i'm here" *gets asked a question* *scrambles to find mute button after hearing your name* "sorry, I didn't catch the second half of what you said, could you repeat that?"
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2016 16:51
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:webex voip is trash 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:04 |
|
|
thread over
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2016 04:13
|
|